It is generally accepted that there are two sides to a coin. There are those that believe OC is the only way to go, and there are those that believe that CC is.
I certainly don't accept the notion that it is either/
or. That, as they say is a logical fallacy.
No one has a right
to OC. No one has a right
We have a right
to bear arms. And a right
These are natural rights, which cannot be infringed according to our constitution.
OC as you will. CC as you will.
To have to choose only one or the other is a false choice.
I concur entirely. I often find myself puzzled at the snobbery shown by proponents of one carry mode vs. the other. I have heard absurd arguments set forth by both sides insisting that their perfered method of carry is the ONLY constitutionally protected way of carry.
It is clear that the constitution itself neither denys nor endorses either mode. Since the constitution doesn't specify a carry mode
, I am of the opinion that any mode I/we find appropriate is legal. Open. Concealed. What's the difference to someone else which I do at any given moment. What valid concern does someone have about which mode of carry a free citizen chooses to use?
It may come as a shock to some, but it is not all that unusual for me to engage in both
modes at the same time. You see me carrying (open mode) a handgun and assume that is the only one I have?? Well, you know what they say about ass