• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Worst States in the Union

ixtow

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
5,038
Location
Suwannee County, FL
imported post

Statesman wrote:
smoking357 wrote:
ixtow wrote:
I'm not sure I follow how this is worst and best for freedom? It just seems to be numbers of officers... not numbers of anti-constitutional laws.
http://www.mercatus.org/uploadedFiles/Mercatus/Publications/Freedom in the 50 States.pdf That report rates each state on much more criteria than just the number of government agencies.
Let's be honest: freedom is the inverse of cops.

A law can't pull me over for no reason and fabricate charges while threatening to kill me, only a cop can.

As for that report, Florida is about the worst place for freedom in the world, yet they list it as akin to Montana?
As long as cops are enforcing laws that respect liberty, protect rights, and only prosecute force, fraud, and abuse, they represent no threat to liberty. Once the law steps outside those bounds, it's only a matter of time and incremental steps to authoritarianism. Good cops who refuse to enforce tyrannical laws will be replaced with bad cops, and even criminals.

At the rate this country is going, Chinese style mobile euthanasia vans are just right around the corner guys and gals! Maybe they will sport American flag wraparounds, with an "In Government we trust!!" mantra?
This is part of why I have little to no respect for Law Enforcement. Pretending to be blind to the evil that so many laws are, makes them nothing more than henchmen.

Didn't take much exposure to them to realize I'd sooner spit on the uniform than wear it.

The mere presence of them, alone, is not the issue.
 

Washintonian_For_Liberty

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
922
Location
Mercer Island, Washington, USA
imported post


[align=left]Top Ten Worst States in the Union

10. Connecticut -0.225
9. Illinois -0.238
8. Massachusetts -0.242
7. Washington -0.275
6. Hawaii -0.304
5. Maryland -0.405
4. California -0.413
3. Rhode Island -0.430
2. New Jersey -0.457
1. New York -0.784

Very telling that every single one of the worst States in the Union for freedom and Liberty are very Liberal States. With all the Californians moving to Washington to escape the hell they created in California, Washington will soon be in the Top Five. The worst part is, is that Liberals actually think they're doing good.
[/align]
 

WheelGun

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2008
Messages
276
Location
Delaware County, New York, USA
imported post

Do not read too much into the statistics. Take them at face value. More officers equals more restrictions on freedom. Period. The statisticsare simple and effective, and tell a great dealabout each state.

New York City has an enormous police department. The downstate suburban counties and the largerupstate cities allhave large police departments, they feel they need them because of the high crime rates.

High crime rate areas tend to have less freedom because the politicians can get away withgreater restrictions on freedom. Therefore, rights are highly restricted.

Rural areas in NY have fewer officers, because they have less crime to deal with. Politicians there are concerned that restrictions on rights will be fought with the vote. Therefore rights are not restricted.

Statistically, more cops equals fewer rights.
 

ixtow

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
5,038
Location
Suwannee County, FL
imported post

WheelGun wrote:
Do not read too much into the statistics. Take them at face value. More officers equals more restrictions on freedom. Period. The statisticsare simple and effective, and tell a great dealabout each state.

New York City has an enormous police department. The downstate suburban counties and the largerupstate cities allhave large police departments, they feel they need them because of the high crime rates.

High crime rate areas tend to have less freedom because the politicians can get away withgreater restrictions on freedom. Therefore, rights are highly restricted.

Rural areas in NY have fewer officers, because they have less crime to deal with. Politicians there are concerned that restrictions on rights will be fought with the vote. Therefore rights are not restricted.

Statistically, more cops equals fewer rights.
If one subscribes to the ideal that "it is only illegal if you get caught," then you are correct.

In the shade, all actions, even murder, are freedoms; as long as the State doesn't see it.

In most things, the idea that 'somewhere in between' or 'a happy medium,' is where civilization or 'morally correct' might be found. But, this is usually just a self-imposed smokescreen for encroachment.

'right' is usually a completely different perspective, not somewhere in between two wrongs.
 

Washintonian_For_Liberty

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
922
Location
Mercer Island, Washington, USA
imported post

WheelGun wrote:
Do not read too much into the statistics. Take them at face value. More officers equals more restrictions on freedom. Period. The statisticsare simple and effective, and tell a great dealabout each state.

New York City has an enormous police department. The downstate suburban counties and the largerupstate cities allhave large police departments, they feel they need them because of the high crime rates.

High crime rate areas tend to have less freedom because the politicians can get away withgreater restrictions on freedom. Therefore, rights are highly restricted.

Rural areas in NY have fewer officers, because they have less crime to deal with. Politicians there are concerned that restrictions on rights will be fought with the vote. Therefore rights are not restricted.

Statistically, more cops equals fewer rights.
Try starting a business. Then, while running it, tell me that these restrictions on your freedom are not bad. They are in many ways worse than having a ton of cops on the street. New York and Washington State are very similar in regards to overbearing regulations that suck freedom from the marrow of our society.
 

ixtow

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
5,038
Location
Suwannee County, FL
imported post

Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:
WheelGun wrote:
Do not read too much into the statistics. Take them at face value. More officers equals more restrictions on freedom. Period. The statisticsare simple and effective, and tell a great dealabout each state.

New York City has an enormous police department. The downstate suburban counties and the largerupstate cities allhave large police departments, they feel they need them because of the high crime rates.

High crime rate areas tend to have less freedom because the politicians can get away withgreater restrictions on freedom. Therefore, rights are highly restricted.

Rural areas in NY have fewer officers, because they have less crime to deal with. Politicians there are concerned that restrictions on rights will be fought with the vote. Therefore rights are not restricted.

Statistically, more cops equals fewer rights.
Try starting a business. Then, while running it, tell me that these restrictions on your freedom are not bad. They are in many ways worse than having a ton of cops on the street. New York and Washington State are very similar in regards to overbearing regulations that suck freedom from the marrow of our society.
But, this is how the government creates unofficial branches with which to do the things it otherwise can't! If you didn't control big business, it would not, in turn, be able to control the consumers and the employees. Which, in a capitalist economy/society; is everyone.
 

Washintonian_For_Liberty

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
922
Location
Mercer Island, Washington, USA
imported post

ixtow wrote:
Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:
WheelGun wrote:
Do not read too much into the statistics. Take them at face value. More officers equals more restrictions on freedom. Period. The statisticsare simple and effective, and tell a great dealabout each state.

New York City has an enormous police department. The downstate suburban counties and the largerupstate cities allhave large police departments, they feel they need them because of the high crime rates.

High crime rate areas tend to have less freedom because the politicians can get away withgreater restrictions on freedom. Therefore, rights are highly restricted.

Rural areas in NY have fewer officers, because they have less crime to deal with. Politicians there are concerned that restrictions on rights will be fought with the vote. Therefore rights are not restricted.

Statistically, more cops equals fewer rights.
Try starting a business. Then, while running it, tell me that these restrictions on your freedom are not bad. They are in many ways worse than having a ton of cops on the street. New York and Washington State are very similar in regards to overbearing regulations that suck freedom from the marrow of our society.
But, this is how the government creates unofficial branches with which to do the things it otherwise can't! If you didn't control big business, it would not, in turn, be able to control the consumers and the employees. Which, in a capitalist economy/society; is everyone.
Remember though, capitalism isn't the problem. The problem is big government legislating and regulating preferential treatment to businesses it deems more acceptable or just legislating and regulating out of pure corruption.
 

ixtow

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
5,038
Location
Suwannee County, FL
imported post

Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:
ixtow wrote:
Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:
WheelGun wrote:
Do not read too much into the statistics. Take them at face value. More officers equals more restrictions on freedom. Period. The statisticsare simple and effective, and tell a great dealabout each state.

New York City has an enormous police department. The downstate suburban counties and the largerupstate cities allhave large police departments, they feel they need them because of the high crime rates.

High crime rate areas tend to have less freedom because the politicians can get away withgreater restrictions on freedom. Therefore, rights are highly restricted.

Rural areas in NY have fewer officers, because they have less crime to deal with. Politicians there are concerned that restrictions on rights will be fought with the vote. Therefore rights are not restricted.

Statistically, more cops equals fewer rights.
Try starting a business. Then, while running it, tell me that these restrictions on your freedom are not bad. They are in many ways worse than having a ton of cops on the street. New York and Washington State are very similar in regards to overbearing regulations that suck freedom from the marrow of our society.
But, this is how the government creates unofficial branches with which to do the things it otherwise can't! If you didn't control big business, it would not, in turn, be able to control the consumers and the employees. Which, in a capitalist economy/society; is everyone.
Remember though, capitalism isn't the problem. The problem is big government legislating and regulating preferential treatment to businesses it deems more acceptable or just legislating and regulating out of pure corruption.
I agree. Capitalism has been turned into Piracy.
 

Washintonian_For_Liberty

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
922
Location
Mercer Island, Washington, USA
imported post

ixtow wrote:
I agree. Capitalism has been turned into Piracy.
Remember, capitalism is a tool like a gun is a tool. You can use them for good just as easily as you can use them for bad. Don't blame the tool for the actions of those using the tool. Put the blame squarely on the shoulders of the human taking the actions which are bad.

I find it annoying when Liberals talk about capitalism vs socialism. That is an invalid argument and shows their ignorance on many levels. Socialism is a form of government. Capitalism is a market tool. Socialist and Communist governments use modified forms of capitalism. Look at China. Look at Europe. Capitalism exists there and is used as a tool.
 

ixtow

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
5,038
Location
Suwannee County, FL
imported post

Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:
ixtow wrote:
I agree. Capitalism has been turned into Piracy.
Remember, capitalism is a tool like a gun is a tool. You can use them for good just as easily as you can use them for bad. Don't blame the tool for the actions of those using the tool. Put the blame squarely on the shoulders of the human taking the actions which are bad.

I find it annoying when Liberals talk about capitalism vs socialism. That is an invalid argument and shows their ignorance on many levels. Socialism is a form of government. Capitalism is a market tool. Socialist and Communist governments use modified forms of capitalism. Look at China. Look at Europe. Capitalism exists there and is used as a tool.
Heh, those are pretty much my exact words in several other threads...
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
imported post

Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:
ixtow wrote:
I agree. Capitalism has been turned into Piracy.
SNIP Remember, capitalism is a tool like a gun is a tool.

"Finance isa gun. Politics is knowing when to pull the trigger."--Don Lucchesi, Godfather III

At the 7:40 mark: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3s_AyEJHttA&feature=related

For western film buffs, the elderlymobster is Tuco of The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, playing Don Altabello.

Another trivia point, the actor who plays Cardinal Lamberto near the end of the clip appeared in the original The Italian Job playing a leader of the Italian Mafia.
 
Top