• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

OT: Local Media bias against privately owned guns

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
imported post

Admittedly off topic for an OC list, but interesting enough I thought I'd share it anyway.

Ok, so we're all familiar with the media bias against guns and gun owners. How about this for a subtle, but stark example right here at home.

Last week a homeowner shot a home invader. KSL referred to the shot criminal as a "shooting 'victim'."
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=7241132


Today, a story about police shooting a criminal. Guess what, no mention of the word "victim".
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=7334275


So if a homeowner shoots a home invader, the invader becomes a "shooting victim" in the eyes of KSL. But if a criminal is shot by the police he is merely a "man shot by police."
And I'd bet nobody at KSL even recognizes their bias on this.

Charles


Edit to correct terrible spacing.
 

Kevin Jensen

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
2,313
Location
Santaquin, Utah, USA
imported post

From what I have read in the past, KSL is usually pretty neutral when it comes to gun-related stories.

On the other hand, The Deseret News and The Salt Lake Tribune make no mistake when it comes to their position. :?
 
Top