Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Nordyke v. King Vacated

  1. #1
    Regular Member Virginiaplanter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    402

    Post imported post

    The 9th circuit 3 judge panel decision has been vacated and the case will be heard en banc by the full 9th circuit:

    http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/in...ordyke_v._King

  2. #2
    Regular Member TFred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    7,705

    Post imported post

    Ok, I'll ask...

    Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

    Does this mean that the rest of the judges on the circuit thought that the decision was bad? Or perhaps that the rest of the judges on the circuit saw a chance to get their names on a landmark decision that will affect the country for generations to come?

    TFred


  3. #3
    Regular Member Decoligny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Rosamond, California, USA
    Posts
    1,865

    Post imported post

    TFred wrote:
    Ok, I'll ask...

    Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

    Does this mean that the rest of the judges on the circuit thought that the decision was bad? Or perhaps that the rest of the judges on the circuit saw a chance to get their names on a landmark decision that will affect the country for generations to come?

    TFred
    Could have many different outcomes.

    1. Could be overturned. This would eliminate the Circuit "split" on incorporation and SCOTUS might decide not to take any of the 2A incorporation cases.

    2. It gets reaffirmed. No real change from a few days ago.

    3. It get reaffirmed and the full 9th rules to allow gunshows at theCounty Fairgrounds and thus eliminates them as"sensitive places" .

    The initial effect is that the 3 panel judge ruling is put on hold, and therefore the 2nd Amendment is back to being "not incorporated" in the 9th Circuit Court jurisdiction.

  4. #4
    Regular Member TFred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    7,705

    Post imported post

    Just found this posted on the General Discussion forum:

    http://www.examiner.com/x-4525-Seatt...e-case-en-banc

    TFred


  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    National City, CA, ,
    Posts
    239

    Post imported post

    How could this be tied up with the amicus filed by state AGs?

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Buffalo Gap, South Dakota, USA
    Posts
    193

    Post imported post

    I think this is lame ~ the 9th Cir finally makes a good decision and they hold themselves back out of fear that they will send the issue to the supremes while the 5-4 Heller majority is still there -

    The Supremes can take the case anyway -

    Sept 21 oral arguments should be good ones - I hope the NRA and GOA and Second Amendment Foundation people are all geared up as I'm sure they are - ~

    It's a set back for those of us who have been enjoying 2nd Amendment rights on the West Coast since the Apr 20th Nordyke ruling -

    Maybe the Supremes will take it out of the 7th Cir before the 9th Cir rules on the en banc case -

    Stupid politics.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    1,422

    Post imported post

    *

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Lancaster County, PA
    Posts
    118

    Post imported post

    I'd give it about 99% odds the people who voted for this wanted to overturn the panel ruling because they don't like the idea of the 2nd Amendment being applied to California. Judges out there HATE gun rights. HATE them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •