-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Re-Tased: TASER releases the X3
- Thread starter Pointman
- Start date
HankT
State Researcher
imported post
I hope the company introduces a civilian model that would be legal for regular ole citizens to carry for self defense.
I've thought aboutgetting an X26c. Would, at the right price. But I don't see very many at the gun shows.
I hope the company introduces a civilian model that would be legal for regular ole citizens to carry for self defense.
I've thought aboutgetting an X26c. Would, at the right price. But I don't see very many at the gun shows.
Nutczak
Regular Member
imported post
HankT wrote:
But NO! Not in the land of cow-schitt & beer farts (Wisconsin) We are not privileged enough, or considered smart enough by our current governor to be able to defend ourselves against criminals in a non-lethal manner.
We are even expected to retreat in our own homes if we encounter a criminal in our home and acting aggressively.
Imagine that, someone breaks into your home, they are intent on harming you, and it is not considered a "legal shoot" until you exhausted your attempts of retreating. "Criminal rights" exceed a law abiding citizens rights in many cases.
HankT wrote:
Some states allow chemical and electronic defense gadgets such as a taser, or other electronicproducts, Right?
But NO! Not in the land of cow-schitt & beer farts (Wisconsin) We are not privileged enough, or considered smart enough by our current governor to be able to defend ourselves against criminals in a non-lethal manner.
We are even expected to retreat in our own homes if we encounter a criminal in our home and acting aggressively.
Imagine that, someone breaks into your home, they are intent on harming you, and it is not considered a "legal shoot" until you exhausted your attempts of retreating. "Criminal rights" exceed a law abiding citizens rights in many cases.
6L6GC
Regular Member
imported post
I think that their basic attitude is that if the gov'mint wanted you to have rights they'd issue you some.
I think that their basic attitude is that if the gov'mint wanted you to have rights they'd issue you some.
Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
I apologize for my part in some of our previous difficulties. It appears that you have got your head straight. Thank you.
I apologize for my part in some of our previous difficulties. It appears that you have got your head straight. Thank you.
Thundar
Regular Member
imported post
Is it true that Israel has developed an effective personal discharge system that would protect the user from most taser attacks?
Is it true that Israel has developed an effective personal discharge system that would protect the user from most taser attacks?
Nutczak
Regular Member
imported post
Thundar wrote:
Thundar wrote:
Ya know, that was going through my mind as I was reading the article. I think it would be fairly simple to have a conductive material weaved within a garment that would effectively create a short-circuit and keep any current flow from entering the body. Carbon-fiber is conductive, there are already wetsuits out that have a titanium weave in them to help heat retention. Maybe that is a patent worth pursuing, a garment that negates the effects of a taser or other offensive electric device. Then the Govt. can restrict people from owning those too, just like they restrict ballistic vests.
Thundar
Regular Member
imported post
I thought they developed a self defence suit that was worn with a processor and battery. It supposedly absorbed initial shock and delivered a counter charge back down the wires that would arc and disable the taser attacker.
I thought they developed a self defence suit that was worn with a processor and battery. It supposedly absorbed initial shock and delivered a counter charge back down the wires that would arc and disable the taser attacker.
Thundar
Regular Member
imported post
The USmC exchange at Camp Elmore has the taserC3 for sale.
The USmC exchange at Camp Elmore has the taserC3 for sale.
Phoenixphire
Campaign Veteran
imported post
Nutczak wrote:
Dear Nutczak,
May I offer you a suggestion?
Visit http://www.freestateproject.org/
Have a good day!
Nutczak wrote:
Dear Nutczak,
May I offer you a suggestion?
Visit http://www.freestateproject.org/
Have a good day!
KS_to_CA
Regular Member
imported post
I guess they can now tazer little 12 year old girls and elderly gentlemen with heart conditions better than it ever was.
:banghead:
I guess they can now tazer little 12 year old girls and elderly gentlemen with heart conditions better than it ever was.
:banghead:
Felid`Maximus
Activist Member
imported post
HankT wrote:
I believe Taser has a policy of only giving their top of the line products to military/law enforcement and not directly selling the top of the line models to regular people.
HankT wrote:
I believe Taser has a policy of only giving their top of the line products to military/law enforcement and not directly selling the top of the line models to regular people.
Heartless_Conservative
Regular Member
imported post
Felid`Maximus wrote:
Felid`Maximus wrote:
That's exactly what I've heard. 15' probes (30' for the police models) and less voltage. Does anyone have a link that confirms this?