Felid`Maximus
Activist Member
imported post
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0651-0700/ab_668_bill_20090601_amended_asm_v97.html
I may be reading it wrong but the best conclusion I've come to is that it still does not apply to unconcealable firearms, and in addition unconcealable firearms are even allowed on parking lots and driveways of schools when in a vehicle?
It seems like it could be read in many ways but other ways seem to make less sense. It almost appears for example that it would make transporting unconceable firearms illegal under all circumstances within 1500 feet except when on a driveway or parking lot, but that woudn't make any sense at all since you would have to drive through the illegal 1500 foot zone first!
(Edited to add: The bill is AB668 not 688... that was a typo.)
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0651-0700/ab_668_bill_20090601_amended_asm_v97.html
[/quote](2) When a lawfully possessed pistol, revolver, or other firearm
capable of being concealed on the person is unloaded and is in a
locked container inside a motor vehicle or unloaded and inside a
locked trunk of a motor vehicle.
This section does not prohibit or limit the otherwise lawful
transportation of any other firearm, other than a pistol, revolver,
or other firearm capable of being concealed on the person, in
accordance with state law , including the otherwise lawful
possession or lawful transportation of a firearm, other than a
pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon
the person, located within a vehicle while the vehicle is
on the driveway or the parking lot of a school .
I may be reading it wrong but the best conclusion I've come to is that it still does not apply to unconcealable firearms, and in addition unconcealable firearms are even allowed on parking lots and driveways of schools when in a vehicle?
It seems like it could be read in many ways but other ways seem to make less sense. It almost appears for example that it would make transporting unconceable firearms illegal under all circumstances within 1500 feet except when on a driveway or parking lot, but that woudn't make any sense at all since you would have to drive through the illegal 1500 foot zone first!
(Edited to add: The bill is AB668 not 688... that was a typo.)