• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Man Exercising Open Carry in Phoenix Explains Obamacare: Theft Plain and Simple

G

giaking70

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
105
Location
San Diego, CA, ,
imported post

wow...that's bad ass...would love to buy that guy an ale...here in Communifornia, we woulda been shot by the police just walking down the street with that...
 
A

Army

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
289
Location
San Luis Obispo, California, USA
imported post

giaking70 wrote:
wow...that's bad ass...would love to buy that guy an ale...here in Communifornia, we woulda been shot by the police just walking down the street with that...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Doubtful. There is simply no anti-carry law for rifles, other than they must be unloaded (school zones not-withstanding). While LEO may have a heated fuss about a semi-auto military look-alike weapon, they would be obliged by law to only check for loaded condition.

There has not been any UOC people shot by LEO, nor have any gang-bangers snatched a UOC weapon. There have been far too many illegal detainments by LEO, yes, nearly all of which have ended with the UOC reholstering his weapon and continuing his lawful business.

The oft repeated "gonna get shot by....." just does not occur.
 
C

CA_Libertarian

State Researcher
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
2,585
Location
Stanislaus County, California, USA
imported post

Army wrote:
Doubtful. There is simply no anti-carry law for rifles, other than they must be unloaded (school zones not-withstanding). While LEO may have a heated fuss about a semi-auto military look-alike weapon, they would be obliged by law to only check for loaded condition.

There has not been any UOC people shot by LEO, nor have any gang-bangers snatched a UOC weapon. There have been far too many illegal detainments by LEO, yes, nearly all of which have ended with the UOC reholstering his weapon and continuing his lawful business.

The oft repeated "gonna get shot by....." just does not occur.
Click to expand...
+1

(Just to clarify: CA school zones do NOT apply to long guns. The main things with long guns are it must be unloaded in cities, and you can't carry it into gov't buildings. Federal school zone laws do include long guns, but that law is extremely questionable in it's constitutionality.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top