BradAnderson
Regular Member
imported post
The federal right of privacy, is defined as the right to be free from public scrutiny.
If a person has a right to carry a handgun under state law, then by logical extension they should also be able to carry it concealed via federal privacy-right.
The Michigan Constitution guarantees every person the right to bear arms for defense of self or the state; likewise, the federal right of privacy requires that they can do so in a manner that allows them to be free from public scrutiny.
The requirement that one carry a gun openly, seems a gross violation of this federal privacy right, since we are being subjected to unreasonable search of our persons and effects for full public view.
Has there ever been a federal case involving this right? It seems that the state of Michigan is simply taking advantage by passing laws to harass citizens.
The federal right of privacy, is defined as the right to be free from public scrutiny.
If a person has a right to carry a handgun under state law, then by logical extension they should also be able to carry it concealed via federal privacy-right.
The Michigan Constitution guarantees every person the right to bear arms for defense of self or the state; likewise, the federal right of privacy requires that they can do so in a manner that allows them to be free from public scrutiny.
The requirement that one carry a gun openly, seems a gross violation of this federal privacy right, since we are being subjected to unreasonable search of our persons and effects for full public view.
Has there ever been a federal case involving this right? It seems that the state of Michigan is simply taking advantage by passing laws to harass citizens.