2ndAmendmentDefender
Regular Member
imported post
Do you think you should be required to get a "Permit" inorder to carry a firearm concealed? Do you think such a requirement is constitutional?
Personally, no I do not think it is constitutional. I feel that the 2nd Amendment IS my CPL. Furthermore I also feel that Chapter 44, Title 18 USC is also Unconstitutional, along with the Brady Bill, Lautenberg Amendment & the 1934 & 1938 Firearms Amendment. Why? Simple, the 2nd Amendment expressly gives us the rights to keep & bear arms. By keep they mean posses, by any means that we feel necessary. I'd also like to address that along with this right, the 2nd Amendment also states that the Government shall not infringe. "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed". This means that under NO circumstances, can the Government revoke, remove or in any way deny you the right to keep and bear arms. Prior to 1938 this meant that even Felons or persons with prior criminal history were able to resume possesing firearms after they served their sentence. I am among the minority when it comes to restoring firearms rights to felons, I feel it is their right to keep and bear arms simply because the 2nd Amendment says that they too are entitled to those same rights as you and I are, hence the phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
I feel that as an armed society we will self regulate ourselves. We will defend ourselves when needed and defend others when it is needed as well. Our founding fathers never intended for us to rely on a large police force or an over bearing sheriff's office. Our founding fathers stated time and time again that the people, being self relient & self governing shall resolve all issues amongstthemselves with out the need of Government interference or regulation.
What are your views on this subject?
Do you think you should be required to get a "Permit" inorder to carry a firearm concealed? Do you think such a requirement is constitutional?
Personally, no I do not think it is constitutional. I feel that the 2nd Amendment IS my CPL. Furthermore I also feel that Chapter 44, Title 18 USC is also Unconstitutional, along with the Brady Bill, Lautenberg Amendment & the 1934 & 1938 Firearms Amendment. Why? Simple, the 2nd Amendment expressly gives us the rights to keep & bear arms. By keep they mean posses, by any means that we feel necessary. I'd also like to address that along with this right, the 2nd Amendment also states that the Government shall not infringe. "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed". This means that under NO circumstances, can the Government revoke, remove or in any way deny you the right to keep and bear arms. Prior to 1938 this meant that even Felons or persons with prior criminal history were able to resume possesing firearms after they served their sentence. I am among the minority when it comes to restoring firearms rights to felons, I feel it is their right to keep and bear arms simply because the 2nd Amendment says that they too are entitled to those same rights as you and I are, hence the phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
I feel that as an armed society we will self regulate ourselves. We will defend ourselves when needed and defend others when it is needed as well. Our founding fathers never intended for us to rely on a large police force or an over bearing sheriff's office. Our founding fathers stated time and time again that the people, being self relient & self governing shall resolve all issues amongstthemselves with out the need of Government interference or regulation.
What are your views on this subject?