mystert85
Regular Member
imported post
i heard that the law changed on july the 1st and i was wondering if this site is legit...
i heard that the law changed on july the 1st and i was wondering if this site is legit...
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
has anyone used conceal-carry.net?
- Thread starter mystert85
- Start date
pyite
Regular Member
imported post
if that is the one that bob's gun shop in norfolk promotes, yes it is legit. a buddy of mine took that class and got his permit. He had no time for a class and shoots quite often anyway.
if that is the one that bob's gun shop in norfolk promotes, yes it is legit. a buddy of mine took that class and got his permit. He had no time for a class and shoots quite often anyway.
mystert85
Regular Member
imported post
thanks Grapeshot!
thanks Grapeshot!
Wolf_shadow
Activist Member
imported post
My wife used it to get her permit. If you are proficient with a firearm it'sgood to go. http://www.concealed-carry.net/HIL23501
My wife used it to get her permit. If you are proficient with a firearm it'sgood to go. http://www.concealed-carry.net/HIL23501
Wolf_shadow
Activist Member
imported post
Grapeshot wrote:
I agree Grapshot. But in a perfect world children would be taught handling and safety of firearms by their family as they were growing up.
Someone who has never handled a firearm should have some hands on instruction. whether from a friend, family member, or instructor for safety.
Grapeshot wrote:
I agree Grapshot. But in a perfect world children would be taught handling and safety of firearms by their family as they were growing up.
Someone who has never handled a firearm should have some hands on instruction. whether from a friend, family member, or instructor for safety.
imported post
Wolf_shadow wrote:
Yata hey
Wolf_shadow wrote:
I understand you full well. Capability, ability and training in manual of arms are all desirable. They are not required though for a CHP (nor do I think they should be) and that is the suggestion that appears to be made with "If you are proficient".
Yata hey
TexasNative
Regular Member
imported post
Are we going to have this same, old, tired argument yet again, where we all really agree on the underlying principles, but we have to beat our chests over semantics and see who can win the pissing contest?
It really gets old after the 476th time, especially since we've all seen that it never advances the discussion.
~ Boyd
Are we going to have this same, old, tired argument yet again, where we all really agree on the underlying principles, but we have to beat our chests over semantics and see who can win the pissing contest?
It really gets old after the 476th time, especially since we've all seen that it never advances the discussion.
~ Boyd
Wolf_shadow
Activist Member
imported post
Grapeshot wrote:
Grapeshot wrote:
Grapeshot Iagree. Probably shouldn't answer when tired. This is closer to what I intended it to mean.
Dutch Uncle
Campaign Veteran
imported post
In a reasonable world, ALL schools would be required to teach children certain life skills at age-appropriate times to ensure their safety. These would include
1. Basic first aid
2. Fire and electrical safety
3. Water safety and basic swimming instruction
4. Basic sex education/STD education
5. Basic firearm safety
6. Poison control
All these can be taught without any political/moral bias, and should be presented as the public's obligation to keep our young ones safe, with the hopes they will stay safe as adults.
Liberals will need to be taught that little Johnnie is no more likely to become a gun-wielding thug if taught about basic firearm safety than he is to become an Olympic swimmer just because he is taught to stay alive if he falls in a lake.
Liberal illogic would be the biggest stumbling block to providing a full range of education to our children. Sad but true.
In a reasonable world, ALL schools would be required to teach children certain life skills at age-appropriate times to ensure their safety. These would include
1. Basic first aid
2. Fire and electrical safety
3. Water safety and basic swimming instruction
4. Basic sex education/STD education
5. Basic firearm safety
6. Poison control
All these can be taught without any political/moral bias, and should be presented as the public's obligation to keep our young ones safe, with the hopes they will stay safe as adults.
Liberals will need to be taught that little Johnnie is no more likely to become a gun-wielding thug if taught about basic firearm safety than he is to become an Olympic swimmer just because he is taught to stay alive if he falls in a lake.
Liberal illogic would be the biggest stumbling block to providing a full range of education to our children. Sad but true.
2a4all
Regular Member
imported post
Dutch Uncle wrote:
Dutch Uncle wrote:
I agree with your list, Dutch, but perhaps a more appropriate analogy would be that little Johnnie is no more likely to become an arsonist if taught about fire and electrical safety, or to become a rapist because he learned about sex ed/STDs.
MSC 45ACP
Regular Member
imported post
Dutch Uncle wrote:
Very well-put, Dutch. I wish my children had been taught this in school. If you involve your children in Scouting, they CAN get the training listed above without any political/moral bias. All these subjects (except sex ED and STD's) are taught to scouts before puberty.
Sorry this is OT.
Dutch Uncle wrote:
Very well-put, Dutch. I wish my children had been taught this in school. If you involve your children in Scouting, they CAN get the training listed above without any political/moral bias. All these subjects (except sex ED and STD's) are taught to scouts before puberty.
Sorry this is OT.
imported post
Can't depend on schools to give them the education they will need to grow up as responsible, moral adults. That is where we as parents must step up and do the job.
It has been my decided conclusion that the children (many of whom I have had the pleasure of meeting) of fellow posters here, are being well educated in the values and skills that will enable them to be responsible adults.
Thank you all for caring enough to give them the very best. They are indeed our future, our legacy.
Back on thread - No I do not know anyone that has utilized on-line training but I have no problem with it for meeting minimum required standards. It is legal by state code. It provides a beginning to a life long journey for some and that is good.
Yata hey
Can't depend on schools to give them the education they will need to grow up as responsible, moral adults. That is where we as parents must step up and do the job.
It has been my decided conclusion that the children (many of whom I have had the pleasure of meeting) of fellow posters here, are being well educated in the values and skills that will enable them to be responsible adults.
Thank you all for caring enough to give them the very best. They are indeed our future, our legacy.
Back on thread - No I do not know anyone that has utilized on-line training but I have no problem with it for meeting minimum required standards. It is legal by state code. It provides a beginning to a life long journey for some and that is good.
Yata hey