Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26

Thread: How Town Hall Meetings Should Go...

  1. #1
    Regular Member swatspyder's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    University Place, Washington, USA
    Posts
    573

    Post imported post

    Listen to what he says.....

    [flash=320,256]http://www.youtube.com/v/_rRE5UK6NQU&hl=en&fs=1&[/flash]

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rRE5UK6NQU

    "THEY are going to LET us keep our health care plan." Well shouldn't it already be and always be, OUR CHOICE!????

  2. #2
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    17,338

    Post imported post

    All politicians need their feet held to the fire like that. Can we get that guy to talk to congress?

    I found it amusing that the politicians wife was clapping, even though he decided to walk out.
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Near The Beach, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    454

    Post imported post

    Patriots are rising...

  4. #4
    Regular Member SouthernBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Western Prince William County, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    5,849

    Post imported post

    God bless this Marine!! I does my heart so good to hear Americans doing this. Standing up to their employees and telling them basically where to get off.

    In the final seconds of your life, just before your killer is about to dispatch you to that great eternal darkness, what would you rather have in your hand? A cell phone or a gun?

    Si vis pacem, para bellum.

    America First!

  5. #5
    Campaign Veteran skidmark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    North Chesterfield VA
    Posts
    10,682

    Post imported post

    "I intend to keep my oath. Do you ever intend to keep yours?"

    That's just like asking "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" Of course the congresscritter deserved to have the question phrased that way.

    Seems more and more the message is changing from "We do not like your version of how tosolve the health care issue" to "This is just one more area where we want you to get out of our lives." I'm really looking forward to Congress returning from theirAugust recess. Gun control health care, the budget are all subjects where congresscritters are hearing that the voters are pretty much on the other side about what to do.

    Now all we have to do is keep the voters reminded what they were upset about and why they were upset till the next election. One thing about OCing in the current political climate is that it is no longer "merely" a 2A issue - it seems to be catching on as a symbol/meme for opposition to socialism.

    stay safe.

    skidmark
    "He'll regret it to his dying day....if ever he lives that long."----The Quiet Man

    Because stupidity isn't a race, and everybody can win.

    "No matter how much contempt you have for the media in all this, you don't have enough"
    ----Allahpundit

  6. #6
    Regular Member SouthernBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Western Prince William County, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    5,849

    Post imported post

    skidmark wrote:
    "I intend to keep my oath. Do you ever intend to keep yours?"

    That's just like asking "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" Of course the congresscritter deserved to have the question phrased that way.

    Seems more and more the message is changing from "We do not like your version of how tosolve the health care issue" to "This is just one more area where we want you to get out of our lives." I'm really looking forward to Congress returning from theirAugust recess. Gun control health care, the budget are all subjects where congresscritters are hearing that the voters are pretty much on the other side about what to do.

    Now all we have to do is keep the voters reminded what they were upset about and why they were upset till the next election. One thing about OCing in the current political climate is that it is no longer "merely" a 2A issue - it seems to be catching on as a symbol/meme for opposition to socialism.

    stay safe.

    skidmark


    Yes sir.

    In the final seconds of your life, just before your killer is about to dispatch you to that great eternal darkness, what would you rather have in your hand? A cell phone or a gun?

    Si vis pacem, para bellum.

    America First!

  7. #7
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    17,338

    Post imported post

    skidmark wrote:
    "I intend to keep my oath. Do you ever intend to keep yours?"

    That's just like asking "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" Of course the congresscritter deserved to have the question phrased that way.

    Simply state 'I never started'. He could probably answer that to both those questions.
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,128

    Post imported post

    Comparing democratic leaders to brownshirts is just as stupid as comparing the teapartiers. It betrays complete ignorance of the criminality of the Nazi movement and is insulting to all those who fought against it and were victimized by it.

    We should not be celebrating demagoguery on any side of this debate.



  9. #9
    Regular Member Repeater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,519

    Post imported post

    sudden valley gunner wrote:
    All politicians need their feet held to the fire like that. Can we get that guy to talk to congress?

    I found it amusing that the politicians wife was clapping, even though he decided to walk out.
    You're on to something. Check out Jesse Kelly:



    Jesse Kelly Web site is here.

    His 2A statement:


    Second Amendment

    The Second Amendment of the Constitution is not just about hunting. It is about the right of a free people to defend themselves which is why I am a strong supporter of the right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Near The Beach, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    454

    Post imported post

    The Donkey wrote:
    Comparing democratic leaders to brownshirts is just as stupid as comparing the teapartiers. It betrays complete ignorance of the criminality of the Nazi movement and is insulting to all those who fought against it and were victimized by it.

    We should not be celebrating demagoguery on any side of this debate.

    Fighting threats to the constitution domestically, takes nothing away from those that did so abroad!

    The Nazi movement was form of socialism...what do we face now? Another form of socialism. If you don't like the truth of it being spoken, if you just want to be an Obama apologist, too bad. To many of us have not spoken up, We are done holding out tongues.

    The simple truth is socialism is a direct threat to this country and the constitution. Those that speak, march, fight against socialism are patriots! Those that support it socialism are anything but...


    “… we shall all consider ourselves unauthorizedto saddle posterity with our debts, and morally bound to pay them ourselves; and consequently within what may be deemed the period of a generation, or the life [expectancy] of the majority.”, wisdom of Thomas Jefferson


    "The Utopian schemes of leveling, and a community of goods, are as visionary and impracticable, as those which vest all property in the Crown, are arbitrary, despotic, and in our government unconstitutional. Now what property can the colonists be conceived to have, if their money may be granted away by others, without their consent?", wisdom of Samuel Adams


    Socialism is both unconstitutional and threat to this republics basic survival.

    http://www.usdebtclock.org/
    (Looking at that link should make anyone with any love for this country figthing mad at what has been done to it by socialism)

    The man in the video both speaks the truth and continues to honor his oath! It is one of the things that gives me hope is to see more and more people like him speaking up and refusing to be quieted by Obama/Socialist Apologiests.

    RESIST SOCIALISM! This nation had fought great wars aginst threats foren, now we face perhaps as great a one as ever, but tha threat is domestic.

    We need more people open carrying to protests, more people that have been quite, but are no more! If your mad as hell at that these socolist bums are doing, it is time to speak up! Dont let the likes MSNBC and the Donkey cause you to hold back, speak out!

    Ok, I feel a little better now!






  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Near The Beach, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    454

    Post imported post

    Repeater wrote:
    You're on to something. Check out Jesse Kelly:

    Jesse Kelly Web site is here.

    His 2A statement
    :


    Second Amendment

    The Second Amendment of the Constitution is not just about hunting. It is about the right of a free people to defend themselves which is why I am a strong supporter of the right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms.
    If he as good as his "on the issues" statements, I would vote for him, and be ready to vote him out again if he does not live up to it.

    We need to learn to be in the habit of tossing the bums out when they spend our money with abandon, trash our rights and ignore the Constitution.

    ....and he should win, after all he would be replacing someone supported Obama's raping the future stimulus bill.

    We can only hope that the anger and concern that is rising in this country in what is going on within government will put more decent people in office.



  12. #12
    Founder's Club Member PrayingForWar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    The Real World.
    Posts
    1,705

    Post imported post

    DonTreadOnMe wrote:
    The Donkey wrote:
    Comparing democratic leaders to brownshirts is just as stupid as comparing the teapartiers. It betrays complete ignorance of the criminality of the Nazi movement and is insulting to all those who fought against it and were victimized by it.

    We should not be celebrating demagoguery on any side of this debate.

    Fighting threats to the constitution domestically, takes nothing away from those that did so abroad!

    The Nazi movement was form of socialism...what do we face now? Another form of socialism. If you don't like the truth of it being spoken, if you just want to be an Obama apologist, too bad. To many of us have not spoken up, We are done holding out tongues.

    The simple truth is socialism is a direct threat to this country and the constitution. Those that speak, march, fight against socialism are patriots! Those that support it socialism are anything but...


    “… we shall all consider ourselves unauthorizedto saddle posterity with our debts, and morally bound to pay them ourselves; and consequently within what may be deemed the period of a generation, or the life [expectancy] of the majority.”, wisdom of Thomas Jefferson


    "The Utopian schemes of leveling, and a community of goods, are as visionary and impracticable, as those which vest all property in the Crown, are arbitrary, despotic, and in our government unconstitutional. Now what property can the colonists be conceived to have, if their money may be granted away by others, without their consent?", wisdom of Samuel Adams


    Socialism is both unconstitutional and threat to this republics basic survival.

    http://www.usdebtclock.org/
    (Looking at that link should make anyone with any love for this country figthing mad at what has been done to it by socialism)

    The man in the video both speaks the truth and continues to honor his oath! It is one of the things that gives me hope is to see more and more people like him speaking up and refusing to be quieted by Obama/Socialist Apologiests.

    RESIST SOCIALISM! This nation had fought great wars aginst threats foren, now we face perhaps as great a one as ever, but tha threat is domestic.

    We need more people open carrying to protests, more people that have been quite, but are no more! If your mad as hell at that these socolist bums are doing, it is time to speak up! Dont let the likes MSNBC and the Donkey cause you to hold back, speak out!

    Ok, I feel a little better now!




    +1 Don't tread!!!

    Bed wetters like the dinkey were calling conservatives nazis for years. Then as it became common knowledge that libtards were actually similar in philosophy they started whining about "Godwin's Law". They're in full retreat, even attempting to recall the old "progressive" label. People just need to be reminded that the "progressive" movement was the very same one which spawned italian fascism and nazism.

    There's nothing "progressive" about it either. Their asinine policies have been tried countless times and failed. It should be called the REGRESSIVE movement.
    If you ladies leave my island, if you survive recruit training. You will become a minister of death, PRAYING FOR WAR...

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,128

    Post imported post

    The Freicorps and the fascists started Nazism. The Nazis beat and then eliminated their socialist and communist competition.

    Obama would stand against the same things that T. Jefferson and S. Adams preached against above. But both of these supported taxation for the public good through the democratic process. Obama supports a revenue neutral health care reform that augments -- and does not replace -- the free market for health insurance.

    One problem with seeing every reformas some form of creeping extremism is that it turns you into creeps and extremists.

  14. #14
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    17,338

    Post imported post

    The Donkey wrote:
    The Freicorps and the fascists started Nazism. The Nazis beat and then eliminated their socialist and communist competition.

    Obama would stand against the same things that T. Jefferson and S. Adams preached against above. But both of these supported taxation for the public good through the democratic process. Obama supports a revenue neutral health care reform that augments -- and does not replace -- the free market for health insurance.

    One problem with seeing every reformas some form of creeping extremism is that it turns you into creeps and extremists.
    ...and what is the danger in seeing every "beneficial" government program as good for us?

    You might have a point if this reform wouldn't cost tax dollars and was true reform, of maybe limiting tort lawsuits that really don't benefit nobody but Lawyers. Also if the government didn't have a long history of abuse of power once we allow them to have it. Think about the National Firearms Act, Marijuana tax stamp act, etc. all ways they circumvented the constitution. How about the 16th amendment, if you told the U.S. population how large the IRS would get and powers that would be granted to them they would have allowed that amendment to be put in place?
    .

    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  15. #15
    Founder's Club Member PrayingForWar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    The Real World.
    Posts
    1,705

    Post imported post

    The Donkey wrote:
    The Freicorps and the fascists started Nazism. The Nazis beat and then eliminated their socialist and communist competition.

    Obama would stand against the same things that T. Jefferson and S. Adams preached against above. But both of these supported taxation for the public good through the democratic process. Obama supports a revenue neutral health care reform that augments -- and does not replace -- the free market for health insurance.

    One problem with seeing every reformas some form of creeping extremism is that it turns you into creeps and extremists.
    The Nazis attacked communists because they were in competition for the support of people inclined to backMarxist policies. Not because they abhorred the idea of controlling everything. They beat and eliminated anyone who openly dissented. The commies and other socialist groups had their own leadership and structure, but differences in policies were limited. Read the 35 tenets of National Socialism yourself, they aren't too far removed from the DNC incidentally. Gun Control and socialized medicine already existed,and hitler certainly did nothing but expand on them.

    Nazism, fascism, socialism, "progressivism" are varying degrees of marxist philosophy. All of them are based on at least strict regulation if not total government control of industries and labor. They all promote massive government control on behavior, they all eliminate upward social movement, under the guise of making classes equal. They all stifle or reduce the individual's ability to enhance his own standard of living. They all limit or outright deny private property, and they all severly limited or totally banned private gun ownership. Just like most of thebed wetters(including the moonbat messiah) openly promote restrictions, registration schemes, stiff taxes, and complete bans.

    Furthermore, if I wanted smoke blown up my a$$, I'd go to San Fransicko with a box of cigars. I've heard your moonbat messiah say, in his own words, without a teleprompter, he wanted a single payer system like those found in euroweenie countries. Don't try to BS me. Obozo stands for NOTHING CLOSE to the philosophies of Jefferson or Adams. He's surrounded himself with bitter authortarians and leftist radicals. Obozo isn't promoting "creeping extremism", he's attempting to undo the fabric of our society and turn us into a european 3rd world $h!thole. I just wish he'd take his dumba$$ (and all his mindless minions like AWDstylez and the dinkey) to Zimbabwe, his work is already done there.
    If you ladies leave my island, if you survive recruit training. You will become a minister of death, PRAYING FOR WAR...

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Near The Beach, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    454

    Post imported post

    PrayingForWar wrote:
    The Donkey wrote:
    The Freicorps and the fascists started Nazism. The Nazis beat and then eliminated their socialist and communist competition.

    Obama would stand against the same things that T. Jefferson and S. Adams preached against above. But both of these supported taxation for the public good through the democratic process. Obama supports a revenue neutral health care reform that augments -- and does not replace -- the free market for health insurance.

    One problem with seeing every reformas some form of creeping extremism is that it turns you into creeps and extremists.
    The Nazis attacked communists because they were in competition for the support of people inclined to backMarxist policies. Not because they abhorred the idea of controlling everything. They beat and eliminated anyone who openly dissented. The commies and other socialist groups had their own leadership and structure, but differences in policies were limited. Read the 35 tenets of National Socialism yourself, they aren't too far removed from the DNC incidentally. Gun Control and socialized medicine already existed,and hitler certainly did nothing but expand on them.

    Nazism, fascism, socialism, "progressivism" are varying degrees of marxist philosophy. All of them are based on at least strict regulation if not total government control of industries and labor. They all promote massive government control on behavior, they all eliminate upward social movement, under the guise of making classes equal. They all stifle or reduce the individual's ability to enhance his own standard of living. They all limit or outright deny private property, and they all severly limited or totally banned private gun ownership. Just like most of thebed wetters (including the moonbat messiah) openly promote restrictions, registration schemes, stiff taxes, and complete bans.

    Furthermore, if I wanted smoke blown up my a$$, I'd go to San Fransicko with a box of cigars. I've heard your moonbat messiah say, in his own words, without a teleprompter, he wanted a single payer system like those found in euroweenie countries. Don't try to BS me. Obozo stands for NOTHING CLOSE to the philosophies of Jefferson or Adams. He's surrounded himself with bitter authortarians and leftist radicals. Obozo isn't promoting "creeping extremism", he's attempting to undo the fabric of our society and turn us into a european 3rd world $h!thole. I just wish he'd take his dumba$$ (and all his mindless minions like AWDstylez and the dinkey) to Zimbabwe, his work is already done there.
    +1 and amen!



  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    1,026

    Post imported post

    The Donkey wrote:
    The Freicorps and the fascists started Nazism. The Nazis beat and then eliminated their socialist and communist competition.

    Obama would stand against the same things that T. Jefferson and S. Adams preached against above. But both of these supported taxation for the public good through the democratic process. Obama supports a revenue neutral health care reform that augments -- and does not replace -- the free market for health insurance.

    One problem with seeing every reformas some form of creeping extremism is that it turns you into creeps and extremists.
    I've had this concept bouncing around in my head for a while now, but could never quite articulate it to my own satisfaction, so I just jotted down the super-mega-ultra-condensed cliffs notes version. I think the concept is clear enough though.



    Government programs, peoples fears, and the end results.


    Program: Income tax
    Government: "TAX THE RICH!"
    People: "Slippery slope...soon you'll be taxing everyone!"
    Government "Oh, pooh! It's ONLY .5% levied on incomes over X amount which is only made by the top 1% of the rich. Quitcher fearmongering."
    End result: You tell me.

    Program: Social Security
    Govt: "Guaranteed retirement money!"
    People: "National ID number..mark of the beast!"
    Govt: "Oh, pshaw!! Quitcher fearmongering."
    End result:You tell me.

    Program: Welfare (in all it's various forms)
    Govt: "Safety net!"
    People: "Hammock for lazies!"
    Govt: "Nonsense...Quitcher fearmongering."
    End result: You tell me.

    Program: Healthcare (finance) reform
    Govt: "Universal coverage! Healthcare for all!"
    People: Higher costs. Rationing. Forced joining"
    Govt: "Myths.....Quitcher fearmongering."
    End result: GUESS!!


  18. #18

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,128

    Post imported post

    I disagree, but kudos on a well articulated argument.

  19. #19
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    17,338

    Post imported post

    The Donkey wrote:
    I disagree, but kudos on a well articulated argument.
    What program does the government run well and have kept its promises on?
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  20. #20
    Founder's Club Member PrayingForWar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    The Real World.
    Posts
    1,705

    Post imported post

    sudden valley gunner wrote:
    The Donkey wrote:
    I disagree, but kudos on a well articulated argument.
    What program does the government run well and have kept its promises on?
    The prison system?

    Of course I would atribute any success there to the people who work there. If they don't secure those sociopaths, they are beaten or killed. Perhaps all bureaucrats should be beaten or killed for failure. Imagine efficiency in government then!!!

    Problem solved, it just needs to be implimented.:celebrate
    If you ladies leave my island, if you survive recruit training. You will become a minister of death, PRAYING FOR WAR...

  21. #21

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,128

    Post imported post

    sudden valley gunner wrote:
    The Donkey wrote:
    I disagree, but kudos on a well articulated argument.
    What program does the government run well and have kept its promises on?
    I think that the military is run well and that it keeps its promises.

    I think that the VA runs a socialized medicine program that generally speaking keeps its promises to our veterans.

    In fact, I think that Medicare has generally kept its promises to the elderly.

    I could go on . . .

    None of these programs are perfect, but many government programs have done a better job of providing servicesin areliable, cost effective manner than many private medical insurers do.

    I have spent part of my career fighting against insuranceplans that interpret themselves as not providing coverage for this or that medical need -- interpreting every ambiguity in their own favor.

    The core of the bills under consideration would imposemandates for certain types of coverage in all private plans, so people don't have to hire folks like me to fight for these types of basic coverage. The pols on both sides of the aisle seem to agree that this is a good idea, and I support it.

  22. #22
    Founder's Club Member PrayingForWar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    The Real World.
    Posts
    1,705

    Post imported post

    The Donkey wrote:
    sudden valley gunner wrote:
    The Donkey wrote:
    I disagree, but kudos on a well articulated argument.
    What program does the government run well and have kept its promises on?

    I think that the military is run well and that it keeps its promises.
    It's run well because of the people inside, inspite of the interference from politicians.

    I think that the VA runs a socialized medicine program that generally speaking keeps its promises to our veterans.
    I am a vet, I think it sucks. I prefer to pay for my own care.

    In fact, I think that Medicare has generally kept its promises to the elderly.
    Was it supposed to go bankrupt? That would imply that it's not "run well".

    I could go on . . .
    Please do dinkey, I'd love to see more asinine examples of how efficient gov't is, and why we should turn over even more of our own responsibilities to an entity that can't even keep bridges from falling down, can't secure the border, can't manage a delivery service, can't manage money on any level, and can't even be held accoutable for it's failures. Please, we are dying too know!!! The only thing you haven't advocated yet is voluntary disarmament, but I suppose you're waiting for your ACORN talking points.
    None of these programs are perfect, but many government programs have done a better job of providing servicesin areliable, cost effective manner than many private medical insurers do.

    I have spent part of my career fighting against insuranceplans that interpret themselves as not providing coverage for this or that medical need -- interpreting every ambiguity in their own favor.

    The core of the bills under consideration would imposemandates for certain types of coverage in all private plans, so people don't have to hire folks like me to fight for these types of basic coverage. The pols on both sides of the aisle seem to agree that this is a good idea, and I support it.
    Very little the government does is even within it's constitutional duties. The things which it is supposed to do, like secure the border, is a miserable failure. The military is run better than any other in the world. I regularly see the militaries of several NATO countries. The Russians could take europe in 20 minutes if we left. Their militaries are a disaster. Ours is better, but no where near as good as it was 20 years ago when liberals pushed their social agenda and pussified it. Now instead of leadership courses, and enhanced skill sets, NCO's are promoted on education that has little if anything to do with their MOS, or their ability to lead. Minorities are promoted, based only on that. Some minorities are passed over for promotion by other minorities because they "ain't down". Liberal social engineers have screwed up the military as far as I'm concerned. Of course liberals have screwed up everything they touched.
    If you ladies leave my island, if you survive recruit training. You will become a minister of death, PRAYING FOR WAR...

  23. #23
    Founder's Club Member ixtow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Suwannee County, FL
    Posts
    5,069

    Post imported post

    DonTreadOnMe wrote:
    PrayingForWar wrote:
    The Donkey wrote:
    The Freicorps and the fascists started Nazism. The Nazis beat and then eliminated their socialist and communist competition.

    Obama would stand against the same things that T. Jefferson and S. Adams preached against above. But both of these supported taxation for the public good through the democratic process. Obama supports a revenue neutral health care reform that augments -- and does not replace -- the free market for health insurance.

    One problem with seeing every reformas some form of creeping extremism is that it turns you into creeps and extremists.
    The Nazis attacked communists because they were in competition for the support of people inclined to backMarxist policies. Not because they abhorred the idea of controlling everything. They beat and eliminated anyone who openly dissented. The commies and other socialist groups had their own leadership and structure, but differences in policies were limited. Read the 35 tenets of National Socialism yourself, they aren't too far removed from the DNC incidentally. Gun Control and socialized medicine already existed,and hitler certainly did nothing but expand on them.

    Nazism, fascism, socialism, "progressivism" are varying degrees of marxist philosophy. All of them are based on at least strict regulation if not total government control of industries and labor. They all promote massive government control on behavior, they all eliminate upward social movement, under the guise of making classes equal. They all stifle or reduce the individual's ability to enhance his own standard of living. They all limit or outright deny private property, and they all severly limited or totally banned private gun ownership. Just like most of thebed wetters (including the moonbat messiah) openly promote restrictions, registration schemes, stiff taxes, and complete bans.

    Furthermore, if I wanted smoke blown up my a$$, I'd go to San Fransicko with a box of cigars. I've heard your moonbat messiah say, in his own words, without a teleprompter, he wanted a single payer system like those found in euroweenie countries. Don't try to BS me. Obozo stands for NOTHING CLOSE to the philosophies of Jefferson or Adams. He's surrounded himself with bitter authortarians and leftist radicals. Obozo isn't promoting "creeping extremism", he's attempting to undo the fabric of our society and turn us into a european 3rd world $h!thole. I just wish he'd take his dumba$$ (and all his mindless minions like AWDstylez and the dinkey) to Zimbabwe, his work is already done there.
    +1 and amen!
    +2
    "The fourth man's dark, accusing song had scratched our comfort hard and long..."
    http://edhelper.com/poetry/The_Hangm...rice_Ogden.htm

    https://gunthreadadapters.com

    "Be not intimidated ... nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your Liberties by any pretense of Politeness, Delicacy, or Decency. These, as they are often used, are but three different names for Hypocrisy, Chicanery, and Cowardice." - John Adams

    Tyranny with Manners is still Tyranny.

  24. #24
    Regular Member KansasMustang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Herington, Kansas, USA
    Posts
    1,005

    Post imported post

    The Donkey wrote:
    Comparing democratic leaders to brownshirts is just as stupid as comparing the teapartiers. It betrays complete ignorance of the criminality of the Nazi movement and is insulting to all those who fought against it and were victimized by it.

    We should not be celebrating demagoguery on any side of this debate.

    Again you've missed the point donkey. It's NOT the Dems that have been tagged as "Brown Shirts" but "We the People" have been. It's not the attendees at town hall meetings that were bussed in, but the goons of the Obama support factor. It's not US that started the violence, but the Union thugs. Nancy Pelosi stated that their were people holding "Swastikas" in the town hall meetings yada yada ad ignausium.
    YOU need to start payin' more attention to what's goin on. I do admire your stickin to your guns, just wondering if you'll ever see the forest for the trees. And, IF you'll still support this BS when they come for yours,,,guns that is.
    MY gawd,,sorry Had to EDIT because I didn't go far enough and read your second, more idiotic post.
    1) Name me ONE VA hospital that runs well, and remember Donkey, I'm a veteran so you'd best do research.
    2) Medicare and Medicaid are almost, if not already bankrupt and Medicaid has an UNFUNDED 26 TRILLION $ liability.
    3) Social in Security is almost bankrupt thanks to the theft by congress and ALL the last several administrations.
    Naw I retract my statement above,,you may have tenacity, but you sir are ignorant of the facts.
    Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. Thomas Jefferson

  25. #25
    Founder's Club Member ixtow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Suwannee County, FL
    Posts
    5,069

    Post imported post

    KansasMustang wrote:
    1) Name me ONE VA hospital that runs well, and remember Donkey, I'm a veteran so you'd best do research.
    I've had a word with quite a few veterans about the one I live near. Some people complain about winning $10M in the lottery. But most say it is an exception to the rule.
    "The fourth man's dark, accusing song had scratched our comfort hard and long..."
    http://edhelper.com/poetry/The_Hangm...rice_Ogden.htm

    https://gunthreadadapters.com

    "Be not intimidated ... nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your Liberties by any pretense of Politeness, Delicacy, or Decency. These, as they are often used, are but three different names for Hypocrisy, Chicanery, and Cowardice." - John Adams

    Tyranny with Manners is still Tyranny.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •