Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Second Amendment cases up early. SCOTUSBlog.com

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Washington Island, across Death's Door, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    9,193

    Post imported post

    http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/second-...ases-up-early/

    The Supreme Court will consider two new cases on the scope of individuals’ Second Amendment right to have guns at its first Conference for the new Term, on Sept. 29, according to the Court’s electronic docket. Both petitions challenge a Seventh Circuit Court ruling that the Amendment does not restrict gun control lawsadopted by state, county or city government, but applies only to federal laws. The cases are National Rifle Association v. Chicago (http://www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-1497.htm]08-1497[/url]) and McDonald v. Chicago (http://www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-1521.htm]08-1521[/url]).

    The so-called “incorporation” issue is the most significant sequel issue raised in the wake of the Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, recognizing for the first time a personal right to have a gun for self-defense, at least in one’s home.
    If the Court agrees to hear the new cases after its first look, that could be announced as early as the day after the Conference — that is, on Wed., Sept. 30. The first Conference of a new Term customarily is held in advance of the Term’s formal opening; this year, the Term starts Oct. 5.

    The Court has not yet scheduled a time to consider another pending case on the Second Amendment issue — Maloney v. Rice http://www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-1592.htm](08-1592[/url]). The response in that case is now due on Aug. 28. The new Justice, Sonia Sotomayor, took part in the Maloney case when she was on the Second Circuit Court. Like the Seventh Circuit, the Second found that the Second Amendment only applies to federal laws. When the Justices consider the Maloney case, Sotomayor is not expected to take part. The fact that she had taken part in a ruling on the issue in one case, however, would not require her to withdraw from considering cases from other Circuits, like the Chicago cases.


  2. #2
    Founder's Club Member Brass Magnet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Right Behind You!, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    2,818

    Post imported post

    Good, I was hoping (and thinking) they would still hear this quickly, evenafter Nordyke en blanc. I was worried they wouldn't get to this before another Obama appointment. Hopefully our rights will prevail, the second will be incorporated, and we can make a federal case out of our state infringements.
    R[ƎVO˩]UTION

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Lex malla, lex nulla

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    San Diego County, CA, California, USA
    Posts
    1,402

    Post imported post

    Hopefully Justice v. Cicero (or whatever they're calling it) will be petitioned and added to the 7th Circuit's cases of blatant defiance of Heller through universally approving infringements.

  4. #4
    Regular Member TFred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    7,705

    Post imported post

    Do we get to know how the individual members vote on whether or not to hear a case?

    TFred


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •