• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

626.9 Exemption request formation

demnogis

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
911
Location
Orange County, California, USA
imported post

This is a subject that is becoming discussed more and more. This thread should serve as our developmental initiative to form a request letter so that we may "blanket" our local school administrations with formal requests. If carrying within a school zone these letters will provide us a legal exemption from 626.9/626.95 on a district-by-district basis. It may be troublesome to carry these letters with you, but should an unlawful detainment occur, they will only work in your defense.

Let's recall the law, first, so that we may properly address it:
Code:
(b) Any person who possesses a firearm in a place that the person knows, or reasonably should know, is a school zone, as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (e), unless it is with the written permission of the school district superintendent, his or her designee, or equivalent school authority, shall be punished as specified in subdivision (f).
This "permission" is the basis of which we will be requesting. A refusal or acceptance letter in the future may help with the overturning of 626.9/626.95. Until that day, we may be able to get our local district superintendents to grant us permission to UOC within these magical 1000ft victim disarmament zones.

Next, identify the school district(s) you may be in the most so that you may request permission from the correct superintendent(s). A full list of CA School Districts can be found here:
http://www.kern.org/fcmat/resources/state/all.html

Now, on to forming our request letter:

[line]
Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to you today as Superintendent/Administrator for [DISTRICT] to provide a resolution to an issue at hand. In our great state of California, the legislature has dictated that it is unlawful for a person to possess a concealable firearm within 1000 feet of a K-12 school unless certain conditions are met. One such condition is the possession is permitted by the superintendent or equivalent authority. Since it is nearly impossible to acquire a concealed carry weapons permit in our state, we do not have many options of possession for our personal protection.

The permission I ask is to be able to lawfully possess my firearm(s) within the 1000ft area of the K-12 schools in your district, [DISTRICT]. I am an average, law abiding citizen and do not have any intent to do anything illegal in any of your district's school zones, nor do I have any intent to carry onto any school properties, which is only allowed by a concealed carry weapons permit. Due to the sporadic saturation of schools throughout the state of California, it is incredibly difficult to go about my business while lawfully in possession of a firearm for my personal protection without your written permission.

Sadly, our cities and states are rife with criminal activity. Many of our streets are full of active gang members and career criminals. These groups and individuals have no respect for the law, and in doing so arm themselves illegally. Again, I only ask for your permission to have the means available to protect myself from those of criminal intent who wish to deprive me of my life or property for those brief moments I may be within 1000ft of a school in your district.

Thank you, and I look forward to your positive response soon.

Sincerely,
-Signed

[line]
Now begins the communal development phase. Please, quote and/or post revisions to areas you think may need changes, factual and positive information that can be added, etc. Remember, a denial letter from a superintendent may be useful in the future when 626.9 is challenged. Their denial is the removal of your right(s) without due process of law! If we're able to amass enough denial letters, a class-action suit could be used in the future...

~D

"Lead by example."
 

Theseus

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
964
Location
Lamma Island, HK
imported post

The only real disagreement I might have with that letter is specifying "concealable" firearms. 626.9 controls all firearms.

I know we have stated it doesn't control long guns, but only if they are "legally transported". Since we have no clarification we may seek to be more general in the request to avoid any situation that may arise from this small but potentially catchy word.

Otherwise I might also mention that IIRC if exempt from 626.9 1000 ft zone, you would be completely exempt even on school grounds. Perhaps I will simply edit mine to include me and grounds of the school my daughter might attend so that I can still carry and drop her off.
 

bigtoe416

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Jun 3, 2008
Messages
1,747
Location
Oregon
imported post

demnogis wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to you today as Superintendent/Administrator for [DISTRICT] to provide a resolution to an issue at hand. In our great state of California, the legislature has dictated that it is unlawful for a person to possess a handgun within 1000 feet of a K-12 school unless certain conditions are met. One such condition is the possession is permitted by the superintendent or equivalent authority. Since it is nearly impossible to acquire a concealed carry weapons permit in our state, I do not have any option to defend myself if attacked within a school zone.

I am asking to be able to lawfully possess my firearm(s) within the 1000ft area of the K-12 schools in your district, [DISTRICT]. I am an upstanding, law-abiding citizen and do not have any intent to do anything illegal in any of your district's school zones, nor do I have any intent to carry onto any school properties, which is only allowed by a concealed carry weapons permit. Due to the sporadic saturation of schools throughout the state of California, it is incredibly difficult to go about my business while lawfully in possession of a firearm for my personal protection without your written permission.

Sadly, our cities and state are rife with criminal activity. Many of our streets are full of active gang members and career criminals. These groups and individuals have no respect for the law, and in doing so arm themselves illegally. Again, I only ask for your permission to have the means available to protect myself from those of criminal intent who wish to deprive me of my life or property for those brief moments I may be within 1000ft of a school in your district.

Thank you, and I look forward to your positive response soon.

Sincerely,
-Signed
I removed parts here and there, I'm not sure how to show removals. I didn't like the term "concealable firearm" because it sounds like it would be carried concealed, which we know if we were allowed to do that then we wouldn't care about the 1000' restriction anyway. I tend to view "concealed" as having a negative connotation and "open" as having a positive one.

I think it's important to focus more on our right being taken away from us and the harm that may come to us as opposed to asking for permission.
 

N6ATF

Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
1,401
Location
San Diego County, CA, California, USA
imported post

dirtykoala wrote:
looks prety good. we should also start forming a reply to their denial. i dont know if we want to be too agressive, but it should remind them that it is now documented that they denied the right to self preservation, ifyou or a family member areattacked while in a school zone....
I'm not sure if a denial reply is necessary, especially if a line is put in the request to the effect of:

"If this law-abiding citizen is denied, the next communication you can expect to receive will be from my process server, in the form of a lawsuit of X or Y nature."
 

Theseus

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
964
Location
Lamma Island, HK
imported post

As has been pointed out on Calguns however, the schools may be immune to liability. Since the state does not observe the right to bear arms, they are not technically infringing on a right.

If anything, I wonder if you could sue them for damaging your property rights. Encroachment if you own property in a school zone perhaps?
 

demnogis

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
911
Location
Orange County, California, USA
imported post

Theseus, you are correct in this respect. Until Nordyke is resolved and the 2nd Amendment is again incorporated, we can only request this permission, amass our letters and save them for when a prime legal organization or team of lawyers wish to pursue a class action suit on behalf of all of those denied their right to bear without due process. If we gather these letters now, it saves us all half the work later when the time to overturn 626.9 comes.

Theseus wrote:
As has been pointed out on Calguns however, the schools may be immune to liability. Since the state does not observe the right to bear arms, they are not technically infringing on a right.
If you mail in one such request letter and receive a denial letter, SAVE IT!!! There is the very likely chance that you will need it in the future, should Nordyke come back incorporating the 2nd again.

(If you can't tell, I hate this f***ing law).
 

unobvs

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
14
Location
, ,
imported post

I also consider this law a travesty and a land mine for the innocent and law abiding.

However, I want to express a gentle reminder of the obvious: any letter sent to a school superintendent willminimize the possibility of the sender mounting an effective defense to a charge of a violation as to that particular school, basedupon a lack of knowledge of its existence or location.

Perhaps this is a price worth paying.
 

CA_Libertarian

State Researcher
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
2,585
Location
Stanislaus County, California, USA
imported post

Updated the Google document. Here's my current version of the letter. (I may revise it, though I don't intend to use it personally, so maybe not.)

Most of my changes were for grammar, sentence structure, etc. However, I did add some content on top of reformatting. I've also removed some things that I didn't think fit in.

For your perusal:

========================================================

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to you today to request your permission to possess firearms within the "Gun Free School Zones" surrounding the campuses within your district.

In our great state of California, the legislature has dictated that it is unlawful for a person to possess a handgun within 1000 feet of a K-12 school unless certain exemptions are met. One such exemption requires that the possession be permitted by the superintendent or equivalent authority. Another common exemption is for the firearm to be in a secure container, which requires handling the firearm in a public forum. As I'm sure you can imagine, a civilian retrieving a firearm from their trunk down the street from one of your schools might cause an alarm in passersby. This could lead to a waste of police resource, and even interruption of the educational process if it leads to a lock down on the campus.

I am an upstanding, law-abiding member of our community and have no intent engaging in any illegal activity while going about my business in these zones. I have no intent to carry onto any school properties. Further, state law requires my firearm(s) to be unloaded in most cases where I would be within one of these zones. Due to the sporadic saturation of schools throughout the state of California, it is incredibly difficult to go about my business while lawfully in possession of a firearm for my personal protection without your written permission.

As you are undoubtedly aware, our cities and state are rife with criminal activity. Many of our streets are full of active gang members and career criminals. These individuals have no respect for the law, and commonly arm themselves illegally within these zones. Your permission would grant me the means to protect my [self/family/children] from these criminal elements for those brief moments [I/we] may be within the "Gun Free School Zones" within your distric.

Since it is nearly impossible to acquire a concealed carry weapons permit in [county], I do not have any option to defend myself if attacked within a school zone. [I suggest omitting this sentence if permits are readily available in your county] For all these reasons, I respectfully request your written permission to lawfully possess/transport my firearm(s) within the 1000ft area of the K-12 schools in your district.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (xxx)xxx-xxxx.

Sincerely,
-Signed
 

greg36f

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
71
Location
, ,
imported post

I gotta tell you, I think that requesting permission to carry within 1000 feet of a school is a terrible idea. NO school official will EVER grant permission. Most educators are moderately too extremely liberal (usually means anti gun) and they would never accept the liability of allowing someone INWRITING to carry a gun near their campus.

It kinda makes you look like a nut asking for something that will NEVER be allowed. Kinda like walking into your Dr's officeand asking if you can start a campfire in the lobby to keep warm. The response would be "NO, and why would you even ask such a thing?" You would be treated with suspicion every time you came back.

You are just going to come off looking like "one of those gun nut guys" and it will damage whatever strides have been made in making open carry acceptable.

Iknow that there are many extremists on this site that are looking for a fight and would welcome controversy,but I think that most people here are just normal people that want to open carry without being stigmatized or harassed.

Asking to carry a gun near a school is really pushing the edge when we really should be working near the center.

Just my two cents
 

demnogis

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
911
Location
Orange County, California, USA
imported post

unobvs wrote:
...However, I want to express a gentle reminder of the obvious: any letter sent to a school superintendent willminimize the possibility of the sender mounting an effective defense to a charge of a violation as to that particular school, basedupon a lack of knowledge of its existence or location.
...
unobvs, we're mailing this to the district superintendent, not the school principals themselves. This way we don't have to worry about knowing where every single public school is within the district.
 

demnogis

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
911
Location
Orange County, California, USA
imported post

Greg36f, your input is noted. However, I think you missed the information above. Right now the 2nd Amendment is not incorporated against our state. When it is, again, these rejection letters will serve as our factual evidence that our right to bear is being infringed upon without due process. Yes, taking down 626.9 is a fight we're all frothing at the mouth for. Blanketing the school districts in CA with this formal request does much of the prep-work for this fight, so that when the time comes we are properly prepared. And your analogy of the Dr's office is way, way off base, though.

Yes, some of us might look like "gun nuts", but believe it or not the schools themselves have no liability whatsoever for anything anyone does, even in their magical 1000ft victim disarmament zones. Whenever there is a shooting, murder or rape within a school zone, is the school held accountable for the criminal's illegal actions? No. It has been established time and time again -- they hold the authority, with no liability.

greg36f wrote:
I gotta tell you, I think that requesting permission to carry within 1000 feet of a school is a terrible idea. NO school official will EVER grant permission. Most educators are moderately too extremely liberal (usually means anti gun) and they would never accept the liability of allowing someone INWRITING to carry a gun near their campus.

It kinda makes you look like a nut asking for something that will NEVER be allowed. Kinda like walking into your Dr's officeand asking if you can start a campfire in the lobby to keep warm. The response would be "NO, and why would you even ask such a thing?" You would be treated with suspicion every time you came back.

You are just going to come off looking like "one of those gun nut guys" and it will damage whatever strides have been made in making open carry acceptable.

Iknow that there are many extremists on this site that are looking for a fight and would welcome controversy,but I think that most people here are just normal people that want to open carry without being stigmatized or harassed.

Asking to carry a gun near a school is really pushing the edge when we really should be working near the center.

Just my two cents
 

greg36f

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
71
Location
, ,
imported post

I would suggest not walking your dog armed near a school.........The school thing is a losing battle. You are NEVER going to get permission from a school official. Not gonna happen. You are expending effort on something that is not going to happen when you could be focusing your efforts on something that could be productive like making concealed carry permits more accessible.

I am not saying that open carry is not your right or that you should not do it where it is legal. I am just saying that asking a school official to allow you to carry a gun near his school can come off as sounding a bit crazy and dangerous. I AM NOT SAYING THAT IT IS CRAZY OR DANGEROUS. I am just saying that it could sound that way to someone who either does not respect your rights or does not understand that you are simply a law abiding citizen respectfully asking for something that you really should not have to ask for as an AMERICAN......

Yes, open carry is your right,,,,,,,and if you want to keep it an "edgy" type thing that keeps provoking a negative reaction in many places, then fine,,,thats your right,,,,,but most people want open carry to become as normal as walking down the street with a cell phone attached to your hip. That will be achieved by making open carry people seem as normal and non threatening as possible, respectfully, but firmly exerting the rights that you already have and yes, going to court (both civil and criminally) when needed.

Malcolm X and/or the Black Panthers arestill seenas dangerous extremists in most people’s minds and they did very little top advance rights,Martin Luther King and the NAACP are seen as examples of reason that did advance rights. Both legal and god given rights.

I don't want to be at a city council meeting where some gun ordinance is teetering on the edge of passing and having some school superintendent accompanied by 20 kids get up and waive a bunch of papers stating, "heck no, these guys even want to carry gun right up to the edges of our schools!" They want to shoot our kids from close range rather than 1000 feet away!!!!!!!

Sound crazy,,,,think about why Calif. banned the 50 Cal. Cause terrorists were going to shoot gas storage facilities!...At least that was the reason that my paper used to support it in their editorial.

Come on,,,,,give me at least 25 cents for the effort......
 

greg36f

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
71
Location
, ,
imported post

The uoc movement is a movement for a reason. If we weren't taking these steps, this would be called the UOC still water.



I agree, but a movement must have an achievable and stated goal.....and there should be movement towards that goal.....Not conflict and wasted effort that does not further movement towards that goal...
 
Top