tai4de2
Regular Member
imported post
From the state Constitution:
SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.
How does the notion of armed security guards relate to this? This would seem to prevent any armed security guards at all -- and rightly so, in my opinion. I don't want fleets of armed goons running around, private property or not.
From the state Constitution:
SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.
How does the notion of armed security guards relate to this? This would seem to prevent any armed security guards at all -- and rightly so, in my opinion. I don't want fleets of armed goons running around, private property or not.