imported post
J.Gleason wrote:
I realize this is a sore subject with some of you, but I would like to point out that there is a candidate that has publicly stated he will sign legislation to change these laws within the first 90 days of office should he be elected.
Seems to me that would leave our funds to be better used for something else. Like legal defense.
Just my .02
I am not "sore" about Mark Todd running, I just don't think he has any real chance of a win. I have some fear that he might even break up the vote, and let a Dem. get back in. I also know that he is the wrong person for me. He may support the 2A better then any others, but that is all he would do for me. My state has more problems then just bad gun laws. I will not give up the rest of my rights, just to get back one. Under his rule, gays would have to go back in a closet, and women would have to go back to coat hangers. I can not live with that. He is just not for me...
But to give credit to him, I will also add that he is a man with values. He also looks to stand up for his values. I do respect Mark for this, and do not wish him any ill will. He is a family man, and looks to love his family (rare in Government now days).
So I might not vote for him, but I would be happy to sit down and "break bread" with him. Heck, I would love to live next to the man. He sounds like a nice person. But that still does not get a vote from me.
The process, and the talk, is all good. It is the best way to help us all cast the best, most informed vote we can. So now we have Mark,Scott, and Mark. It sure would be nice if we could make sure that one of them gets in (I still think both "Marks" will only take away votes from our best
chance). I think it would change the Wisconsin gun laws once and for all, no matter who gets it (of the three).