• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Federal Judge rules police liable to Alamogordo, NM open carrier

bigtoe416

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Jun 3, 2008
Messages
1,747
Location
Oregon
imported post

This is a superb opinion. I'm so amazingly pleased with the Judge who authored this.
 

snoball

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
143
Location
, ,
imported post

Mike- thanks for posting this. Everyone ought to save a copy of this opinion to show any police that ask when you open carry. Even though open carry is legal, some police need to be reminded that they cannot question someone to the point of detention just for open carrying. Another reason for an open carry get-together.
 

GoldCoaster

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
646
Location
Stratford, Connecticut, USA
imported post

Wow, what a wonderfully written opinion. We need more judges with the intellectual prowess that this judge has throughout the country.

I'm going to print this one out and keep it. This is great case law!
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

New Mexico and Arizona share a common heritage. I find it nearly impossible for a LEO in either state to harrass anyone for bearing arms in the traditional mode. It's doubtful that the Alamagodo PD personnel are 'native' or would they would not be be ignorant of the culture. Either thru ignorance or at the alter of 'politically correct' opinion... they chose to deliberately ignore the New Mexico Constitution:

"New Mexico: No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons. No municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms. Art. II, § 6 (first sentence enacted in 1971, second sentence added 1986).
1912: "The people have the right to bear arms for their security and defense, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons." Art. II, § 6. [Self-defense right explicitly protected.]

Clearly... this was a violation of a citizens rights under color of law. I hope St John owns a goodly piece of Alamagordo and the LEO's involved after due process.
 
Top