-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Finally a Federal Ruling!
- Thread starter J.Gleason
- Start date
ilvg2k
Regular Member
imported post
FTA: "Though police harassment of open carriers is rare..."
What? The Wisconsin OC forum would say otherwise. Good read and even better ruling.
FTA: "Though police harassment of open carriers is rare..."
What? The Wisconsin OC forum would say otherwise. Good read and even better ruling.
Birdhunter
Regular Member
imported post
Does this have any standing in Wisconsin? I see that it is in the District of New Mexico. Wondering if this can be used in any cases in Wisconsin.
Does this have any standing in Wisconsin? I see that it is in the District of New Mexico. Wondering if this can be used in any cases in Wisconsin.
Brass Magnet
Founder's Club Member
imported post
Birdhunter wrote:
Birdhunter wrote:
Courts like to cite rulings from other courts whether in their jurisdiction or not. So it will help. I think the main issue it helps with is denying the officers qualified imunity.