So, it's just something i think about periodically...
- What would it take to get RCW9.41.270 rewritten, reworded, or even removed so as to eliminate any questionable, open ended, or vaguely interpreted language. Would this open pandora's box allowing harsher language ? or would this benefit us ?? Is it worth it to attempt ? If so, how hard would it be?
- End Game, would like to see OC and self protection be a strongly protected right, and ensure LEO self interpretations cease.
Something like: (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to aggressively and intentionally draw, point, or assertivelyhandle any firearm, dagger, sword, knife or other cutting or stabbing instrument, club, or any other weapon apparently capable of producing bodily harm, in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to victimise an innocent person, or that intentionally and willfully jeopardises the safety of other persons who are innocent in their capacities.
-- Well, something like that .... I am not a lawyer, so, some ideas here, your thoughts etc....
Any other RCW we should look at revising ?
- TY -