N6ATF
Banned
imported post
ixtow wrote:
ixtow wrote:
That presumption of guilt used to exist in AZ, supposed bastion of civil rights that it is. I would not be surprised if it was law or policy in the majority of DA jurisdictions nationwide. 22,000 infringements on the 2A... would take decades if not centuries to knock them all down in the courts. And the traitorous bastards know it.N6ATF wrote:Aye, but the Prosecutor surely hasn't got a crystal ball any better than mine... How could s/he even be aware of the event yet?ixtow wrote:It does if the prosecutor wants to turn your self-defense into a criminal offense.There was no cause to seize the weapon, there is no such thing as a required ATF 'check'....
Yes, flag on the play.
Defending your life from an attacker does not create evidence of a crime.
Unless there is some kind of standing policy established to presume all gun owners who defend themselves are guilty until proven innocent. If there is, I think that would be pretty damning to them, not the victim who had to defend themselves.