OC4me
Regular Member
imported post
Mike wrote:
Mike wrote:
Yes, we do! Just having an 'academic' discussion. The low-hanging fruit is quite abundant and more urgent.Gray Peterson wrote:Huh? You think 4 justices are going to agree to let machine guns proliferate in the United States over the objection of Congress? Really? We don't even have an established right to carry in public with a license, let alone the right to possess an unusal weapon lik a machine gun.Ok, are you guys talking about challenging the NFA in it's entirety, or just taking on 922(o)? Taking on NFA entirely is much more difficult than taking on just 922(o) (which is a ban on civilian possession of select fire weapons made after May 19th, 1986), and even then, taking on 922(o) is a very tough proposition.
We have 4 SCOTUS justices for certain who would be for taking out 922(o).
Litigation is path dependent - go for the easiest low hanging fruit first - this must occur over years, even decades. Each case is a stepping stone. reach to high at first, and the ledge will break off, blocking your path forever.
Do people on this board really not understand this??