HankT
State Researcher
imported post
Tawnos wrote:
I don't think you read the details either, Tawnos.
Here, they are at this link:
http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/view_topic.php?id=29182&forum_id=12&highlight=rfid
Tawnos wrote:
Assuming you're as dense as your online persona, I'll type slowly so you can absorb it.
We have the right to be safe from unreasonable search and seizure. This right has been defined to mean search without consent when there is no probable cause a crime has occurred. RFID allows search and seizure of a person's information without their consent, and without any suspicion of wrongdoing. Moreover, mandatory RFID provides a means by which to search for those concealed carrying, effectively allowing search of all parties within the room sans consent.
There are other implications as well - RFID skimming to "clone" guns could become a way for criminals to avoid traces, or to frame innocent victims.
How, in any way (apart from the aforementioned density), can you not see that allowing instant search of identification associated with a person is an inherent violation of the right against unreasonable search and seizure? Next you know we will all need implanted RFID to make sure that sex offenders aren't too close to schools, or drunk drivers aren't allowed to purchase alcohol, or any of a thousand other offenses.
In short: HFID is as stupid an idea as you are dense an individual. Your concern trolling and repeated advocacy for "HankT's so and so" ideas stands contrary to reason, rights, and even the law.
I don't think you read the details either, Tawnos.
Here, they are at this link:
http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/view_topic.php?id=29182&forum_id=12&highlight=rfid