• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Pittsburgh G20 response

KBCraig

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,886
Location
Granite State of Mind
imported post

Some absolutely crazy stuff going on.

"By order of the city of Pittsburgh chief police {sic}, I hereby declare this to be an unlawful assembly. I order all those assembled to immediately disperse. You must leave the immediate vicinity. If you remain in the immediate vicinity, you will be in violation of the Pennsylvania crimes code{sic}, no matter what your purpose is."

"...no matter what your purpose is"? Journalists, prayer circles, sign wavers, all can be summarily declared "in violation" of peaceful assembly and and free speech.

This is being announced on the LRAD ("Long Range Acoustic Device"), a pain compliance device designed to make people run away while clutching their ears in pain (or else suffer serious permanent hearing loss).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAwmX5O-FAE

There is some serious spin going on in the news. Most news reports talk about thousands of protesters and thousands of police, then go on to mention how rioters smashed windows, etc. The obvious conclusion: police are battling thousands of rioters and trying to protect private property.

Except when you read the actual details, you find the violence was very limited, and only a couple of dozen people were arrested.

I'm the furthest thing, politically speaking, from those who describe themselves as "progressive". As for those violent thugs who call themselves "anarchists", well... they need to buy a better dictionary, and take a look in the mirror at who is trying to rule others by violence.

I don't care: they have the same right to protest that I do, no matter what failed policies they're pushing.
 
Top