Wow.. talk about a rigged overly sided editorial. I find the poll even more interesting.
At the bottom of the article you see the following as of a few seconds ago:
Wednesday's results Our editorial: Florida must improve its program for checking caregivers' backgrounds.textSize() Copyright © 2009, Orlando Sentinel"
Thumbs up:[/i] 74.1%
Thumbs down:[/i] 25.9%
So we look at the poll question which is
Do you agree with the Sentinel's opinion?
Now looking at the stats at the bottom of the article one would think that wow there are a lot of people that actually agree with this BS. Then you vote the poll and you get the following
Vote on our editorial Do you agree with the Sentinel's opinion?
1022 total responses
- Thumbs up (48 responses)
- Thumbs down (974 responses)
(Results not scientific)
Now I am no genius here, but I have worked with rocket scientists in the past and I am pretty sure that 974 negative responses at 95.3% of the people voting this poll are significantly more than what is posted at the bottom of the article. Maybe since what is posted at the bottom of the article was the last time they had the lead with those that agree with them? LOL
BTW.. if you havent voted this poll, please do so before they close it..thanks
American by birth, Southern by choice