• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Bloomberg,Daley, Barette & Co. At It Again

Flipper

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
1,140
Location
, Wisconsin, USA
imported post

More un-constitional restrictionsleading tocreation of a national police force to disarm americans proposed by MAiG. Note that they are not releasing their proposals to the public, but only providing them to Obama's group (i.e. Holder).Holder isaman who by word and action isagainst the Second Admendment . This could turnvery scarey for Americans.

http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/InTheNews.aspx?ID=12969


Wisconsin mayors that want to prohibitthe exercise of constitional rights are (vote them out):


Wisconsin:

spacer.gif


Ashland, WI

spacer.gif


Madison, WI

spacer.gif


Milwaukee, WI

spacer.gif


Park Falls, WI

spacer.gif


Rhinelander, WI

spacer.gif


Saint Francis, WI

spacer.gif


Waukesha, WI

spacer.gif


West Bend, WI
 

FLR&@

New member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
147
Location
, ,
imported post

Here is the real problem..

[suP]And federal prosecutors should more aggressively prosecute people who fail the background check, the study says. In 2005, the FBI referred 67,713 cases to the ATF, but federal prosecutors pursued only 135 of those cases. [/suP]

Is anyone aganst proscuteing felons for buying guns?

It seems the ATF may be, and on that subjest why can't the FBI bring charges?
 

AaronS

Regular Member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
1,497
Location
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
imported post

FLR72 wrote:
Here is the real problem..

[suP]And federal prosecutors should more aggressively prosecute people who fail the background check, the study says. In 2005, the FBI referred 67,713 cases to the ATF, but federal prosecutors pursued only 135 of those cases. [/suP]

Is anyone aganst proscuteing felons for buying guns?

It seems the ATF may be, and on that subjest why can't the FBI bring charges?
Now this is a good start to "see" the problem. 67,713 cases, and only 135 filed? This is just a prime example of the Fed. in action.
 
Top