Two retorts: Which part of "shall not be infringed" is not understood? And; "If a felon may properly be disbarred his rights under color of law then we can all be legally disarmed merely by sufficiently lowering the bar of 'felony', as has been done in the cases of domestic violence and veterans victimized by diagnoses."
In another but similar thread my mention of the Continuum Fallacy seemed to redound. The application of it to even cases such as mentioned in this newsrag is still aborning, maybe y'all can run with it.
Either we are equal or we are not. Good people ought to be armed where they will, with wits and guns and the truth.