imported post
I too have a hard time with the word "allowed". On the one hand I would never want a murderer, rapist, armed robbery nor any other "armed felon" to be given back the right to self preservation/determination. On the other hand as Doug aforementioned, knock down the determination of felony, and soon if we jaywalk we'll be felons. Having read the article, I firmly believe that the fella that held his wife captive 4 days and the other that held the gun to his girlfriends head already commited felonies. One felony kidnapping, the other assault with a deadly weapon. Now I'm not a lawyer nor a judge but I know a bit about the law. And I know the UCMJ by heart, which also reflected large amounts of civil law +++ some things not in civil law. But,, I also know WHAT part of "Shall not be infringed" I understand.
Get a grip Doug, you want either of those two fella's I mentioned NEAR your wife or daughter?? I don't.