buster81
Regular Member
imported post
NigNog wrote:
NigNog wrote:
Care to take your trolling elsewhere?
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Capitol Times letter to Editor
- Thread starter hopnpop
- Start date
B
Bikenut
Guest
imported post
NigNog wrote:
NigNog wrote:
B
Bikenut
Guest
imported post
NigNog wrote:
NigNog wrote:
NigNog.... that response is straight out of Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals. You have outed yourself Sir. And I was just beginning to enjoy playing the game. Sad really.
Task Force 16
Campaign Veteran
imported post
NigNog wrote:
First you say that OC "IS a method of self-defense" then turn around and claim that equating OC with self-defense is a misnomer.
Who's confused????? :lol:
NigNog wrote:
You contradict yourself, sir.
First you say that OC "IS a method of self-defense" then turn around and claim that equating OC with self-defense is a misnomer.
Who's confused????? :lol:
hopnpop
Regular Member
imported post
NigNog wrote:
For the record, not that I think NigNog gives a crap, I'm quite offended by your broad generalizations. You say something like "you're a shining example of what's wrong with this movement" as tho you're the posterchild for it. From where I stand, you're not even a supporter, so how dare you point your finger at someone and say they're part of the problem? People like YOU, sir, are part of the problem.
I don't know where you get your emotional non-intellect, but I believe your comments on self-esteem, self-confidence, feeling special,being feared, and being laughed at - are all far from accurate. I wear my pistol for logical, sensible reasons which have nothing to do with feeling or emotion. I carry because it's the right tool for a job I hope I'm never faced with. I equate my carriage of a pistol to wearing a seatbelt. Even if we had no seatbelt law, I'd still wear mine because it's aprovenly effective life-saving device. I put it on everyday, knowing that the chances of me needing it are quite minimal, but if the unlikely happens, my wearing it will greatly increase my chances of survival. The exact same principal applies to the carry of a firearm.
On open carry vs. concealed, it's my perrogative. When wearing more than a t-shirt above the waist, I normally conceal. When the weather's nice and warm, I openly carry for comfort. I sometimes openly carry to promote the knowledge if its legality. I shouldn't have to justify the open carriage of a pistol to anyone by the likes of you, but your closed-minded perspective of why people openly carry is contradictory to mine, which prompts me to reply. I have no intention of debating with you and I don't think I have anything more to convey to you, other than possibly some explitives that may pop out the longer I see you posting here. In fact, I don't see how your posting(s) here does anything for any cause, other than possibly satisfying some personal need to irritate strangers from the safety of your living room.
Lastly, you posted: "If you missed the other thread that contained my operating logic, don't respond to my comments in this one."
You're posting on this thread. Do you expect anyone todig thru your posts in other threads before replying tosomething stupid you said in this one? You seem to be a little full of yourself. You're not worth the clicking. Now, if you'd kindly piss off.
NigNog wrote:
For the record, not that I think NigNog gives a crap, I'm quite offended by your broad generalizations. You say something like "you're a shining example of what's wrong with this movement" as tho you're the posterchild for it. From where I stand, you're not even a supporter, so how dare you point your finger at someone and say they're part of the problem? People like YOU, sir, are part of the problem.
I don't know where you get your emotional non-intellect, but I believe your comments on self-esteem, self-confidence, feeling special,being feared, and being laughed at - are all far from accurate. I wear my pistol for logical, sensible reasons which have nothing to do with feeling or emotion. I carry because it's the right tool for a job I hope I'm never faced with. I equate my carriage of a pistol to wearing a seatbelt. Even if we had no seatbelt law, I'd still wear mine because it's aprovenly effective life-saving device. I put it on everyday, knowing that the chances of me needing it are quite minimal, but if the unlikely happens, my wearing it will greatly increase my chances of survival. The exact same principal applies to the carry of a firearm.
On open carry vs. concealed, it's my perrogative. When wearing more than a t-shirt above the waist, I normally conceal. When the weather's nice and warm, I openly carry for comfort. I sometimes openly carry to promote the knowledge if its legality. I shouldn't have to justify the open carriage of a pistol to anyone by the likes of you, but your closed-minded perspective of why people openly carry is contradictory to mine, which prompts me to reply. I have no intention of debating with you and I don't think I have anything more to convey to you, other than possibly some explitives that may pop out the longer I see you posting here. In fact, I don't see how your posting(s) here does anything for any cause, other than possibly satisfying some personal need to irritate strangers from the safety of your living room.
Lastly, you posted: "If you missed the other thread that contained my operating logic, don't respond to my comments in this one."
You're posting on this thread. Do you expect anyone todig thru your posts in other threads before replying tosomething stupid you said in this one? You seem to be a little full of yourself. You're not worth the clicking. Now, if you'd kindly piss off.
Gordie
Regular Member
imported post
NigNog wrote:
NigNog, you have shown yourself to be prejudiced and bigoted. You make the accusation that Doug is from the "evangelical right", I don't recall him ever saying what his spiritual beliefs, if any, are. You assume,due toyour own preconceived notions and beliefs, not from any evidence presented here, that Doug is an evangelical.Maybe he is, maybe he isn't. Either way, I haven't seen any evidence displayed here one way or the other.
As a person that would be from the evangelical right, I can say that it is my belief that racism is a sign of ignorance and/or stupidity, and should never be tolerated by polite company.
Why would you even bring religion into this discussion? It has nothing to do with this thread. By doing so you have shown your own prejudice against those of faith.
Since you brought it up, in the Bible, race usuallyreferred toreligious belief or nation of origin, not skin color. In a Biblical context, you have shown yourself to be a racist. Please take your ignorance, and/or stupidity somewhere else.
NigNog wrote:
NigNog, you have shown yourself to be prejudiced and bigoted. You make the accusation that Doug is from the "evangelical right", I don't recall him ever saying what his spiritual beliefs, if any, are. You assume,due toyour own preconceived notions and beliefs, not from any evidence presented here, that Doug is an evangelical.Maybe he is, maybe he isn't. Either way, I haven't seen any evidence displayed here one way or the other.
As a person that would be from the evangelical right, I can say that it is my belief that racism is a sign of ignorance and/or stupidity, and should never be tolerated by polite company.
Why would you even bring religion into this discussion? It has nothing to do with this thread. By doing so you have shown your own prejudice against those of faith.
Since you brought it up, in the Bible, race usuallyreferred toreligious belief or nation of origin, not skin color. In a Biblical context, you have shown yourself to be a racist. Please take your ignorance, and/or stupidity somewhere else.
KansasMustang
Regular Member
imported post
NigNog wrote:
Might I suggest you read at least the Deckaration of Independence and the Constitution, that is if you can read and get back to me on exactly what part of "The right of the people shall NOT be infringed" that you don't understand?
Of course, I'm arguing with an idiot but I'm armed with the TRUTH
You say you carry, I bet you don't because of the way you attack others. I think therefore you are a troll of the nth magnitude.
NigNog wrote:
The WEAPON represents that I have the gonads to protect myself and my family. You obviously have been gelded and led down the primrose path that the government will protect you. You have neither the courage nor the understanding that my life and my self determination are MY responsibility, not some "government official"
Might I suggest you read at least the Deckaration of Independence and the Constitution, that is if you can read and get back to me on exactly what part of "The right of the people shall NOT be infringed" that you don't understand?
Of course, I'm arguing with an idiot but I'm armed with the TRUTH
You say you carry, I bet you don't because of the way you attack others. I think therefore you are a troll of the nth magnitude.
suntzu
Regular Member
imported post
all I can do is simply shake my head in disbelief every time I read :cuss: like that guy wrote. If he does not like my country then he can feel free to leave and not let the door slam him in the ________ on the way out.
People like that would be easily enslaved by a godless tyrannical government.
all I can do is simply shake my head in disbelief every time I read :cuss: like that guy wrote. If he does not like my country then he can feel free to leave and not let the door slam him in the ________ on the way out.
People like that would be easily enslaved by a godless tyrannical government.
suntzu
Regular Member
imported post
NigNog wrote:
NigNog wrote:
you are a liberal who feels compelled to hide behind and totally depend on people with big guns to protect you, because you are unwilling to take the responsibility for your own safety--right?
suntzu
Regular Member
imported post
We need a DON'T FEED THE TROLLS sign....
We need a DON'T FEED THE TROLLS sign....
Bookman
Campaign Veteran
imported post
suntzu wrote:
suntzu wrote:
How about this one?
suntzu
Regular Member
imported post
Bookman wrote:
Bookman wrote:
That sign should do nicely thank you
imported post
hopnpop wrote:
Ah, so you DO wear your seat belt. Had you been paying attention, that excludes you from the group I was lambasting.
Now, go back and read - try to comprehend this time.
No where did I make absolute statements covering ALL gun owners.
hopnpop wrote:
NigNog wrote:
For the record, not that I think NigNog gives a crap, I'm quite offended by your broad generalizations. You say something like "you're a shining example of what's wrong with this movement" as tho you're the posterchild for it. From where I stand, you're not even a supporter, so how dare you point your finger at someone and say they're part of the problem? People like YOU, sir, are part of the problem.
I don't know where you get your emotional non-intellect, but I believe your comments on self-esteem, self-confidence, feeling special,being feared, and being laughed at - are all far from accurate. I wear my pistol for logical, sensible reasons which have nothing to do with feeling or emotion. I carry because it's the right tool for a job I hope I'm never faced with. I equate my carriage of a pistol to wearing a seatbelt.
Ah, so you DO wear your seat belt. Had you been paying attention, that excludes you from the group I was lambasting.
Now, go back and read - try to comprehend this time.
No where did I make absolute statements covering ALL gun owners.
suntzu
Regular Member
imported post
NigNog wrote:
Now take your trolling to another site.
NigNog wrote:
I read your posts-they made me want to throw up. I stand behind what I said--you are a liberal who hates the thought of individuals carrying guns, let alone carrying them openly. You, also feel the need to hide behind LE and depend on them to protect you.
Now take your trolling to another site.
suntzu
Regular Member
imported post
NigNog wrote:
NigNog wrote:
I know how hard it is to argue with the ignorant of society who listen to the brady bunch and depend on their government to do their thinking for them--so I think, considering you are probably as ignorant as you sound--that I shall simply ignore you, and hopefully this thread will die and you will get tired of people ignoring you and you, like the trolls who came before you will simply leave and find some other site more suitable to your liberal thinking.