imported post
Jay wrote:
Ok thanks for the clarification but either way it will not matter cause I am not a resident, and will half to pay $100.00
Yes, and that sucks. When the Dems took over the General Court, they spent a lot of money first, then started looking for how to pay for it all. Some genius looked at the non-res RPL and thought, "Hey, If we quintuple the price, we'll get five times the revenue! At no additional cost to the state!"
Thus is the level of understanding of free market forces amongst the statists. :banghead:
So, the result is that the state will get a tiny fraction of non-res renewals, and lose revenue. The only ones renewing (or applying for new licenses) will be those from neighboring states who are in NH often enough to make it worth the the money.
Are you in Vermont now, or still in CT? You might want to update your location in your profile settings. If you're still in CT, you'll need a CT license to get a non-res NH license. Vermonters are specifically excluded from that requirement (since VT doesn't issue a license), but they do require a letter from their chief of police. All other non-residents must have a license issued by their state of residence to get a non-res NH license.