-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
WKOWTV.com 'Lawmakers wants abusers stripped of gun rights'
- Thread starter Doug Huffman
- Start date
Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
http://www.wkowtv.com/global/link.a...://www.wkowtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=11356489
Login manager says:
http://www.wkowtv.com/global/link.a...://www.wkowtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=11356489
Login manager says:
Comments not possible at the moment.
Brendon .45
Regular Member
imported post
Is there any info on how many of those 156 shootings were self-defense against the aggressor w/ restraining order versus how many were the aggressor doing the shooting?
Is there any info on how many of those 156 shootings were self-defense against the aggressor w/ restraining order versus how many were the aggressor doing the shooting?
ROOK_WI
Regular Member
imported post
Some communities arrest BOTH participants involved with DV...thismayprevent the person whoreally needs thefirearm from having it.
Some communities arrest BOTH participants involved with DV...thismayprevent the person whoreally needs thefirearm from having it.
opusd2
Regular Member
imported post
Well then, there is always the option of carrying a baseball bat. It was done in Walking Tall.
It's just so damn fricken unnerving hearing about all these laws to be set when what is currently on the books doesn't work! Why not use a bigger funnel, and eventually we will get the bad guy.
Well then, there is always the option of carrying a baseball bat. It was done in Walking Tall.
It's just so damn fricken unnerving hearing about all these laws to be set when what is currently on the books doesn't work! Why not use a bigger funnel, and eventually we will get the bad guy.
J.Gleason
Banned
imported post
The problem is that even these laws are abused.
The police in many cases will simply arrest someone for DA even with the knowledge that the individuals were simply having a verbal argument.
While the officers have the discretion as to whether or not to arrest, they simply just arrest instead.
There are many people in the jails simply because they did not agree with their spouse over some family debt, a TV show or something else equally insignificant.
The fact is the police can simply check out the call, insure there are no injuries or fighting going on and warn the individuals. The officer can, if he so desires write a report as to why he believes no arrest was necessary and submit it to the DA's office.
Either way, arrest or not they should write a report. They just chose to make an arrest simply because they can and nothing more. It is an abuse of authority and ruins many lives.
The problem is that even these laws are abused.
The police in many cases will simply arrest someone for DA even with the knowledge that the individuals were simply having a verbal argument.
While the officers have the discretion as to whether or not to arrest, they simply just arrest instead.
There are many people in the jails simply because they did not agree with their spouse over some family debt, a TV show or something else equally insignificant.
The fact is the police can simply check out the call, insure there are no injuries or fighting going on and warn the individuals. The officer can, if he so desires write a report as to why he believes no arrest was necessary and submit it to the DA's office.
Either way, arrest or not they should write a report. They just chose to make an arrest simply because they can and nothing more. It is an abuse of authority and ruins many lives.
SprayAndPray
Regular Member
imported post
Doug Huffman wrote:
They already are.....
The Lautenburg act. People are prohibited persons for yelling at their wife on the phone , or throwing a crumpled up piece of paper at her.
Doug Huffman wrote:
They already are.....
The Lautenburg act. People are prohibited persons for yelling at their wife on the phone , or throwing a crumpled up piece of paper at her.
imported post
Wait until they start coming out with exemptions for LEO's. DV is unfortunately common with police spouses.
The old vampire Lautenberg came up with one more way to disarm otherwise law abiding citizens. What makes DV so much more serious than other misdemeanors of violence? If someone assaults their "partner" that seriously, then they should be charged with felonies.
Wait until they start coming out with exemptions for LEO's. DV is unfortunately common with police spouses.
The old vampire Lautenberg came up with one more way to disarm otherwise law abiding citizens. What makes DV so much more serious than other misdemeanors of violence? If someone assaults their "partner" that seriously, then they should be charged with felonies.
SAK
Regular Member
imported post
Anyone have a bill # for this? Not much use without seeing the text of it.
Anyone have a bill # for this? Not much use without seeing the text of it.
Master Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
Then you search for it. I looked at Democrap Taylor's activities and am still dirtied by that leftist statist dreck. Utterly amazing. No wonder we suffer the Obamination.
Then you search for it. I looked at Democrap Taylor's activities and am still dirtied by that leftist statist dreck. Utterly amazing. No wonder we suffer the Obamination.