imported post
Just a quick question for the legal eagles here.
If somehow Nichols angle should succeed in the courts, that city property is really like private property, and not "public". Wouldn't that open the door to further abuses of power, much larger in scale?
For example, I can ask anyone to leave my property, anyone I don't like for what ever reason I have. Should the city be granted this freedom. Would it not be much easier for the city to practice discrimination against unwanted classes of people attempting to gather, or attend events.
Obviously they wouldn't publish a no "insert favorite target group name here" wanted, butinformally they (city police)could randomly ask people to leave or be trespassed.
Best Regards
FM
Just a quick question for the legal eagles here.
If somehow Nichols angle should succeed in the courts, that city property is really like private property, and not "public". Wouldn't that open the door to further abuses of power, much larger in scale?
For example, I can ask anyone to leave my property, anyone I don't like for what ever reason I have. Should the city be granted this freedom. Would it not be much easier for the city to practice discrimination against unwanted classes of people attempting to gather, or attend events.
Obviously they wouldn't publish a no "insert favorite target group name here" wanted, butinformally they (city police)could randomly ask people to leave or be trespassed.
Best Regards
FM