Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Obama backing UN Control of Arms Sales

  1. #1
    Regular Member Thundar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Newport News, Virginia, USA

    Post imported post

    This crap is being negotiated in the UN DISARMAMENT COMMITTEE


    U.N. backs negotiations on global arms trade treaty

    Reuters - Saturday, October 31

    By Louis Charbonneau

    UNITED NATIONS - U.N. members on Friday overwhelmingly backed negotiations on a global treaty to regulate the world's $55 billion weapons trade, but two big arms suppliers, Russia and China, refused to support the measure.

    Most top arms suppliers -- the United States, Britain, France and Germany -- backed a resolution in the disarmament committee of the U.N. General Assembly that will guide negotiations on a treaty.

    Only Zimbabwe voted against it, and 19 countries abstained, including major arms producers Russia, China, India and Pakistan. The resolution gained 153 votes in favour.

    While a global treaty may impose stricter export controls on sales to nations that now lack them, diplomats said rogue governments and militants would likely continue to find black-market options.

    Zimbabwe and the countries that abstained are mostly states that Western powers and rights advocates have repeatedly accused of human rights violations. Despite the abstentions, diplomats said most of them planned to participate in formal negotiations on the treaty, set to begin next year.

    The diplomats added the decision by Russia and China to abstain showed there was less than unanimous support for global regulations based on compliance with international human rights standards among the big arms suppliers -- and indicated negotiations on the treaty would be tough.

    U.S. President Barack Obama's decision to back talks on a global arms trade treaty reversed the position of the Bush administration, which had opposed it on grounds that national controls were better.

    Washington agreed to join negotiations on condition the final treaty conference in 2012 be run on the basis of consensus, effectively giving the United States and all other delegations veto powers.

    That angered Germany, Ireland and others, which expressed concern the result would be a weaker treaty. Diplomats said Britain persuaded Berlin and Dublin the concession was worth it to have the United States, which controls two-thirds of global arms sales, on board.

    They said Washington had argued it needed to be able to block an outcome that would permit lower international standards than the strict U.S. criteria for arms sales. U.S. firms would be at a competitive disadvantage if their competitors faced less stringent criteria, the diplomats said

    He wore his gun outside his pants for all the honest world to see. Pancho & Lefty

    The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us....There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! ...The war is inevitable–and let it come! I repeat it, Sir, let it come …………. PATRICK HENRY speech 1776

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    N47º 12’ x W122º 10’

    Post imported post

    No more guns at sea if this passes!!!
    I don't see what you allege in the article. Care to elaborate?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts