imported post
Hawkflyer wrote:
SlowDog wrote:
Hawkflyer wrote:
Bugs on a windshield pretty much prove the "big slow bullet" theory.:lol:
Huh? Do you mean the bigger the bug the bigger the splat? Like in bigger bullet spread out means bigger "splat"?hehehehe:lol::lol:
Yea, a Buick works on just about anything from Ant(i)s to Zebra, so it is fairly obvious that big heavy stuff moving slow works. Works with cars AND firearms. Very reliable physics at play there.
Where is Grapeshot?
He can verify the stories about guys during the war between the states having a problem on the battle field seeing BIG cannon balls bouncing across the field and thinking they were spent. Some were moving so slow that soldiers would put their foot out to kick them, and it would take their legs right off. Big, heavy, and slow will get you every time.
But since I can't carry a Buick in a holster, I use a .45 ... or ....Well a .50 is good too
Does playing alone outside make you nervous Hawk? I am right here. :lol:
The eternal (infernal) caliber debate continues ad nasium.
Cliff Note version:
Any caliber you have with you is better that none.
Recent advances in ammo development make any of the popular defensive calibers effective enough in most instances, but bigger generally translates to better.
Primary (popular) calibers are: .380; .38/357; 9mm; .40 & .45
Know 9 isn't caliber
I limit my comments to these loadings for sake of brevity.
The .380 is as small as I would go - don't personally own or want one though. With the right load/rd. they will get the job done if the operator does his job.
A .38 is a step up but is limited to revolvers and still not in my selection range for primary carry. The .357 mag was the standard to which all others were compared - it does tend to recoil heavily with a lot of muzzle flash. It is my favorite revolver load.
The 9mm is a decent round - high cap guns avail. - chosen by armies all over the world, not because it was the best - but because the weapon held more ammo and more ammo could be carried by weight. Fine for supply/transport, but not for the grunts IMO, especially not in FMJ. Moves fast, hits hard enough with right projectile.
The old/new .40 cal - very snappy rd in small or light guns - some say a baby 10mm.
Most loads are very snappy, especially in compacts. Excellent round that hits very hard.
Yes I know I left off the 10mm. : )
And then we have the .45 ACP - chambered most often in a 1911 brilliantly designed by the Rt. Rev. John Moses Browning. (Think maybe I like it?) Slower than others above - yep. Frontal area and foot pounds more than make up the difference and the felt recoil is more of a shove/push in your hand than a sharp/hard hit.
The .45 ACP has been repeatedly selected by elite teams, special units, competitive shooters, service personnel that have a choice and a large percentage of people here. It is a popular gun/load for a reason - it works fantastically well. In my book it is numero uno. Isn't this to what everybody compares these days.....hmmm.
I carry Corbon DPX and Federal HST exclusively. Three eight round mags gives me 25 rds of southern comfort.
Bottom line - Their stings range from yellow jacket to wood hornet. I would not chose to be in front of any of these, but I prefer to stand behind a .45. Don't mind a few pounds of .45 riding quietly and politely on my belt.
Make your choice based upon your own needs and standards (YMMV), but carry something and carry it responsibly.
Yata hey