-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Kent Man - Carrying - Asked to Leave Seattle Community Center
- Thread starter kwiebe
- Start date
tyguy808
Regular Member
imported post
Hey guys,
Let's atleast read through the FIRST page of post before starting a new thread. This is the third post regarding this matter.If there is already a post regardinga matter,rather than start a new one, post your thoughts/comments on the existing thread.
Hey guys,
Let's atleast read through the FIRST page of post before starting a new thread. This is the third post regarding this matter.If there is already a post regardinga matter,rather than start a new one, post your thoughts/comments on the existing thread.
kwiebe
Regular Member
imported post
tyguy808 wrote:
Let's also not make it worse by claiming - erroneously - that a scanning of the "FIRST page of post" wasn't in fact done. Isn't it possible that someone could have read the newspaper article I did, thought it would be of interest to this forum, and posted a link to it, *after* scanning the post titles here?
It wasn't obvious to me that "Kent Attorney to Join Fight Against Seattle Gun Ban" was the same issue. Sounds more like a legal maneuver, rather than someone actually carrying into a park (as my headline read).
I think it's fine to suggest posts go into an existing thread. But you really don't have to accuse people of being lazy. This type of thing happens on forums and wastes a few electrons. Big deal.
tyguy808 wrote:
Ah, you must be the marshal here. Sorry, thread police...
Let's also not make it worse by claiming - erroneously - that a scanning of the "FIRST page of post" wasn't in fact done. Isn't it possible that someone could have read the newspaper article I did, thought it would be of interest to this forum, and posted a link to it, *after* scanning the post titles here?
It wasn't obvious to me that "Kent Attorney to Join Fight Against Seattle Gun Ban" was the same issue. Sounds more like a legal maneuver, rather than someone actually carrying into a park (as my headline read).
I think it's fine to suggest posts go into an existing thread. But you really don't have to accuse people of being lazy. This type of thing happens on forums and wastes a few electrons. Big deal.
Cremator75
Regular Member
imported post
kwiebe wrote:
kwiebe wrote:
+1
.45ACPaddy
Regular Member
imported post
Wow. He came, was told to leave, and left. And this made the news?
Someone must have been bored at TNT. Can someone respond to jamestrice on that page and kindly correct what he said? The guy wasn't brandishing.
Main Entry: [sup]1[/sup]bran·dish
Pronunciation: \ˈbran-dish\Function: transitive verb Etymology: Middle English braundisshen, from Anglo-French brandiss-, stem of brandir, from brant, braund sword, of Germanic origin; akin to Old English brandDate: 14th century 1 : to shake or wave (as a weapon) menacingly
2 : to exhibit in an ostentatious or aggressive manner
The guy had it in a holster.
Wow. He came, was told to leave, and left. And this made the news?
Someone must have been bored at TNT. Can someone respond to jamestrice on that page and kindly correct what he said? The guy wasn't brandishing.
Main Entry: [sup]1[/sup]bran·dish
Pronunciation: \ˈbran-dish\Function: transitive verb Etymology: Middle English braundisshen, from Anglo-French brandiss-, stem of brandir, from brant, braund sword, of Germanic origin; akin to Old English brandDate: 14th century 1 : to shake or wave (as a weapon) menacingly
2 : to exhibit in an ostentatious or aggressive manner
The guy had it in a holster.
killchain
Regular Member
imported post
Was this one of the OCDO members?
Was this one of the OCDO members?
trevorthebusdriver
Regular Member
j2l3
Regular Member
imported post
killchain wrote:
killchain wrote:
Nope.
trevorthebusdriver
Regular Member
imported post
NavyLT wrote:
NavyLT wrote:
Did you tell him about the clandestine meetings and the supreme leaders? :celebrate
1245A Defender
Regular Member
imported post
trevorthebusdriver wrote:
trevorthebusdriver wrote:
tell me about the meetings and the leaders. deros72 wrote something about an extra meeting that wasnt open to all and he and comadore76 havent been around the board for awhile. im sure something is up but i dont know what it is!
deanf
Regular Member
imported post
You'll have to call the Office of Internal Secrets. Their phone number, email address, and other contact information are not available.
You'll have to call the Office of Internal Secrets. Their phone number, email address, and other contact information are not available.