manicdevery
Regular Member
imported post
I have had a couple encounters with other CPL holders that i have had a hard time convincing/argue the point of OC. i was just hoping to get some feedback from some people on this forum.
I have had a coupleCPL holdersargue thatit says "concealed" so it has to be "concealed", and my response is usually that if the only way i could open carry is without a CPL then i would never have got one in the first place and point out that there are certain places that youcan't OC without a CPL.
Just having a hard time winning these arguments and was wondering some of the wisdom from some of the people on this forum.
Devery
I have had a couple encounters with other CPL holders that i have had a hard time convincing/argue the point of OC. i was just hoping to get some feedback from some people on this forum.
I have had a coupleCPL holdersargue thatit says "concealed" so it has to be "concealed", and my response is usually that if the only way i could open carry is without a CPL then i would never have got one in the first place and point out that there are certain places that youcan't OC without a CPL.
Just having a hard time winning these arguments and was wondering some of the wisdom from some of the people on this forum.
Devery