Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Docket Info

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    250

    Post imported post

    Superior Court Case Summary
    Court: King Co Superior Ct
    Case Number: 09-2-39574-8


    Sub
    Docket Date
    Docket Code
    Docket Description
    Misc Info

    1
    10-28-2009
    CMP
    Complaint


    2
    10-28-2009
    *ORSCS
    JDG0001
    Set Case Schedule
    Judge Timothy A. Bradshaw Dept 1
    04-18-2011ST

    3
    10-28-2009
    CICS
    LOCS
    Case Information Cover Sheet
    Original Location - Seattle


    4
    10-28-2009
    SM
    Summons


    5
    10-28-2009
    CICS
    Case Information Cover Sheet


    6
    11-05-2009
    ORCJ
    JDG0018
    Order For Change Of Judge
    Judge Susan Craighead, Dept 18


    7
    11-05-2009
    REC
    JDG0001
    Recusal Of Judge
    Judge Timothy A. Bradshaw Dept 1


    8
    11-06-2009
    AFSR
    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service


    9
    11-06-2009
    AFSR
    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service


    10
    11-06-2009
    AFSR
    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service


    11
    11-06-2009
    AFSR
    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service


    12
    11-06-2009
    AFSR
    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service


    13
    11-06-2009
    NTAPR
    Notice Of Appearance / Defs


    14
    11-06-2009
    AFSR
    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service

    15
    11-16-2009
    AFSR
    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service


    16
    11-16-2009
    AFSR
    Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service


    17
    11-16-2009
    NTHG
    Notice Of Hearing /aff Of Prej
    11-24-2009

    18
    11-16-2009
    AFPRJ
    Affidavit Of Prejudice



  2. #2
    Regular Member SpyderTattoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kent, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,018

    Post imported post

    ?
    Certified Glock Armorer

    "A government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen..." -- Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. App.181)

    A 1911 that works properly is as rare as a Glock that doesn't.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    250

    Post imported post

    This is the Docket Info for the court case that we are all talking about recently. The City Of Seattle getting sued by the SAF, WAC, and all

    RE: The Gun Ban In Seattle Parks & Rec

    Just thought people might be interested in the activities on this case. People have been asking what is going on, well here it is. The wheels of justice move very slowly, sometimes like molasses.

    Already we have a judge who's recused in this case. I wonder why?

    XD

  4. #4
    Founder's Club Member - Moderator Gray Peterson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lynnwood, Washington, USA
    Posts
    2,238

    Post imported post

    This isn't from something of my own personal knowledge (from the case), but self-recusals by judges are rather common if they have a friendship involving a member of a law firm on either side, or they believe that they personally can't judge a case fairly due to strongly held personal beliefs. The first set of circumstances are more common than you think.

  5. #5
    Regular Member FMCDH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    2,043

    Post imported post

    Thanks for that.

  6. #6
    Campaign Veteran Right Wing Wacko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Marysville, Washington, USA
    Posts
    645

    Post imported post

    One could note that the new Judge "Susan Craighead" is a Gregoire appointee. Not that it means she won't be fair, but I get nervous when that happens... especially in King County where some really weird rulings have come forth.

  7. #7
    Founder's Club Member - Moderator Gray Peterson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lynnwood, Washington, USA
    Posts
    2,238

    Post imported post

    Right Wing Wacko wrote:
    One could note that the new Judge "Susan Craighead" is a Gregoire appointee. Not that it means she won't be fair, but I get nervous when that happens... especially in King County where some really weird rulings have come forth.
    I don't judge people by who appointed them, I judge them by their history and what they'd done and decided.

    Before Gregoire, there was Gary Locke. Before Gary Locke, there was Mike "Grabass" Lowry, before Mike Lowry, it was Booth Gardner for two terms. If the issue has to do with party affiliation, I point out that it was Booth Gardner (D) who signed into law RCW 9.41.290, our state's preemption statute.

  8. #8
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    17,338

    Post imported post

    Gray Peterson wrote:
    Right Wing Wacko wrote:
    One could note that the new Judge "Susan Craighead" is a Gregoire appointee. Not that it means she won't be fair, but I get nervous when that happens... especially in King County where some really weird rulings have come forth.
    I don't judge people by who appointed them, I judge them by their history and what they'd done and decided.

    Before Gregoire, there was Gary Locke. Before Gary Locke, there was Mike "Grabass" Lowry, before Mike Lowry, it was Booth Gardner for two terms. If the issue has to do with party affiliation, I point out that it was Booth Gardner (D) who signed into law RCW 9.41.290, our state's preemption statute.
    ...but the (D) have changed oh so much more for the worse over the past 30 years.

    ....but so have the (R).....

    If you want socialism nowvote for (D) if you want it in 10 years vote (R).
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  9. #9
    Regular Member GreatWhiteLlama's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Bothell, Washington, USA
    Posts
    287

    Post imported post

    sudden valley gunner wrote:
    Gray Peterson wrote:
    Right Wing Wacko wrote:
    ...but the (D) have changed oh so much more for the worse over the past 30 years.

    ....but so have the (R).....

    If you want socialism nowvote for (D) if you want it in 10 years vote (R).
    I couldn't have said it better myself.

    Which brings to bear our 'two party system', which can be summed up as; "where are we going? And why are we in this basket?"
    "...our media are palace eunuchs gazing avidly at the harem of power and stroking their impotent pens in time to the rape of our liberties."
    -Sarah Hoyt

    "America is at that awkward stage; it's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."
    -Claire Wolfe

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    250

    Post imported post

    Some new info that I updated...

    Notice Of Hearing /aff Of Prej
    11-24-2009

    18
    11-16-2009
    AFPRJ
    Affidavit Of Prejudice

    http://www.courts.wa.gov/court_rules...d=cljcrrlj8.09

    http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?Cite=4.12.050








  11. #11
    Founder's Club Member - Moderator Gray Peterson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lynnwood, Washington, USA
    Posts
    2,238

    Post imported post

    Btw, the "Affidavit of Prejudice" is against the currently sitting judge, Susan Craighead, if I am reading the law correctly, as the previous judge recused himself from the case and doesn't count against that affidavit statute.

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Everett, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,339

    Post imported post

    Gray Peterson wrote:
    Btw, the "Affidavit of Prejudice" is against the currently sitting judge, Susan Craighead, if I am reading the law correctly, as the previous judge recused himself from the case and doesn't count against that affidavit statute.
    That is correct. Self recuses do not count towards an affidavit of prejudice.
    "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity."

    "though I walk through the valley in the shadow of death, I fear no evil, for I know that you are by my side" Glock 23:40

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    E TN
    Posts
    165

    Post imported post

    Its interesting that SAF is all about suing Seattle on exactly the same issue that they said I COULDNT sue Richland over. Like they have any authority to tell me THAT?

    That cost them a cash donation.

  14. #14
    Regular Member FMCDH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    2,043

    Post imported post

    Capn Camo wrote:
    Its interesting that SAF is all about suing Seattle on exactly the same issue that they said I COULDNT sue Richland over. Like they have any authority to tell me THAT?

    That cost them a cash donation.
    So, your saying they somehow forced you not to?

    Or did they simply advise against it?

    If they did force you not to bring lawsuit, how did that go exactly? Why did you allow them to dictate what you could and could not do?

    This should be interesting.

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    1,863

    Post imported post

    Capn Camo wrote:
    Its interesting that SAF is all about suing Seattle on exactly the same issue that they said I COULDNT sue Richland over. Like they have any authority to tell me THAT?

    That cost them a cash donation.
    What, exactly did SAF say?
    What sort of lawsuit did you plan to file?

  16. #16
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    17,338

    Post imported post

    Don't worry about it Camo, do what you wanna do, they advised me not to open carry after my Bellingham incident I just ignored that ridiculous advice.
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •