kparker
Regular Member
imported post
No story in the News Tribune yet?
No story in the News Tribune yet?
I live 6 blocks away from the intersection.Nice job!! Nice that the Lakewood Police did a good job. Some of those guys look like they are maybe 16 years old...or maybe it's just me getting old. That corner is about 5 blocks from my house. I wonder what the story was regarding the arsonist.
Finally, no....no pistol lanyard. Not a fan of them, and in this case, it would have complicated the whole "Drop your gun!!" thing. Many who use them may not have thought of that situation.
Just another way to place it on the ground, without having to hold it and possibly get shot as you do so. You unvelcro the lanyard belt loop while the gun is hanging and lower it, or just let it hang, hands sky high (as far as they can possibly be from the gun), and let them secure it.It was lovingly, albeit in a quick manner, placed gently on the ground.
I take it you have never lived in Washington. Don't get me wrong i love the state but most of it is a puddle lol.Only one suggestion for any future situations like this.
Position yourself appropriatelywith the knowledge that the Police will probably prone you out on the ground.
In other words, don't stand in, or in front of a puddle.
Move a little to one side or the other before the Police arrive.
Dry and cold is always more comfortable than wet and cold.
Good point."
They of course cuffed me first, as I had the gun, and told me they were detaining me until they could sort the whole thing out. "
Then Id be talking to a lawyer. You (we) are authorized under RCW to bear arms to assist LEO. Not be arrested by them.
This is how these situations are handled by Police, and TRAKATAK was well aware of this. As for talking to a lawyer, I guaranteeyou would be wasting your time and money. The "assisting" you are referring to is ifREQUESTED by LE to assist. This is usually a bad idea except in extreme circumstances as thePD will now bear responsibility for a citizens actions, and most Cops are not willing to take a big risk on an unknown quantity. Also that was a detainment, not an arrest.Capn Camo wrote:Good point."
They of course cuffed me first, as I had the gun, and told me they were detaining me until they could sort the whole thing out. "
Then Id be talking to a lawyer. You (we) are authorized under RCW to bear arms to assist LEO. Not be arrested by them.
Capn Camo wrote:Good point."
They of course cuffed me first, as I had the gun, and told me they were detaining me until they could sort the whole thing out. "
Then Id be talking to a lawyer. You (we) are authorized under RCW to bear arms to assist LEO. Not be arrested by them.
Capn Camo wrote:Good point."
They of course cuffed me first, as I had the gun, and told me they were detaining me until they could sort the whole thing out. "
Then Id be talking to a lawyer. You (we) are authorized under RCW to bear arms to assist LEO. Not be arrested by them.
Call 911 on your hands-free, ask them if they want your assistance in arresting this attempted arsonist. If they say no, they bear responsibility for telling you to back off and let a massive explosion occur, if they say yes please, then they shouldn't arrest and unarrest you and try to get away with it by using the sick euphemism "detainment".N6ATF wrote:This is how these situations are handled by Police, and TRAKATAK was well aware of this. As for talking to a lawyer, I guaranteeyou would be wasting your time and money. The "assisting" you are referring to is ifREQUESTED by LE to assist. This is usually a bad idea except in extreme circumstances as thePD will now bear responsibility for a citizens actions, and most Cops are not willing to take a big risk on an unknown quantity. Also that was a detainment, not an arrest.Capn Camo wrote:Good point."
They of course cuffed me first, as I had the gun, and told me they were detaining me until they could sort the whole thing out. "
Then Id be talking to a lawyer. You (we) are authorized under RCW to bear arms to assist LEO. Not be arrested by them.
I understand your point, but you are only seeing a narrow view of the incident, from TRAK's perspective. What you don't know is that there were several passersby that called 911 and said that there was a fire, and some guy had a gun pointed at a person who is on the ground. Do you think the people who called 911 knew what was going on?Neither did the Copsarriving onscene, as it is very difficult to know who did what, and who is the bg. Add darkness and rain and a potential explosion, and you can begin to see this from a Cops perspective.I don't know about anybody else, but no amount of "atta boys" from the cops is gonna make up for making me lay on wet pavement in 40-degree weather, getting cuffed, and put in a patrol car for half an hour when I was the good guy helping someone else.
Come on, already. Just putting down the gun or holstering it is plenty. If the cop can't tell who the good guy is froma few moments of interaction, plus the phone call and on-scene witnesses, something is really missing here. Like, judgement, maybe.
Give me a break.
You sure would think so, wouldn't you.No story in the News Tribune yet?
Johnny Law, you hit the nail on the head. For any person on this website to think that the police were in any way out of order is denying the reality of the situation and they are, frankly, being delusional. Were I the police, I would have acted the same way if I came to the scene with the exact information they had been given. They didn't know me from Adam, so why should they take my word that I was a good guy until they could prove otherwise? All that serves is to put them, and others on scene, at potentially unnecessary increased risk.
Citizen wrote:I understand your point, but you are only seeing a narrow view of the incident, from TRAK's perspective. What you don't know is that there were several passersby that called 911 and said that there was a fire, and some guy had a gun pointed at a person who is on the ground. Do you think the people who called 911 knew what was going on?Neither did the Copsarriving onscene, as it is very difficult to know who did what, and who is the bg. Add darkness and rain and a potential explosion, and you can begin to see this from a Cops perspective.I don't know about anybody else, but no amount of "atta boys" from the cops is gonna make up for making me lay on wet pavement in 40-degree weather, getting cuffed, and put in a patrol car for half an hour when I was the good guy helping someone else.
Come on, already. Just putting down the gun or holstering it is plenty. If the cop can't tell who the good guy is froma few moments of interaction, plus the phone call and on-scene witnesses, something is really missing here. Like, judgement, maybe.
Give me a break.
Police arrive = everyone is disarmed until the circumstances are sorted out.