• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Stopped an arson last night

TRAKATAK

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
55
Location
Puyallup, Washington, USA
imported post

As for home defense, my Sig is my carry pistol. For home defense there are at least 3 more options for me, 2 of them have way more firepower than my .40 Sig.

Also, I knew I would be put in the prone and cuffed, so there was no surprise about what would happen when the police arrived. She had stopped in the middle of the street, I was only 4 feet from her, and the entire street was a puddle, because (no surprise) it was raining in Washington........HARD. My nearest dry land was more than 15 feet away, and I was not going to meander over to it holding a gun when the police VERY QUICKLY arrived on scene. But I understand your intent on the comment. When POSSIBLE....position yourself appropriately. In this case, it was not possible.

Finally, no....no pistol lanyard. Not a fan of them, and in this case, it would have complicated the whole "Drop your gun!!" thing. Many who use them may not have thought of that situation.
 

.45ACPaddy

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
999
Location
Lakewood, WA
imported post

Nosrac wrote:
Nice job!! Nice that the Lakewood Police did a good job. Some of those guys look like they are maybe 16 years old...or maybe it's just me getting old. That corner is about 5 blocks from my house. I wonder what the story was regarding the arsonist.
I live 6 blocks away from the intersection.
 

N6ATF

Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
1,401
Location
San Diego County, CA, California, USA
imported post

TRAKATAK wrote:
Finally, no....no pistol lanyard. Not a fan of them, and in this case, it would have complicated the whole "Drop your gun!!" thing. Many who use them may not have thought of that situation.
It was lovingly, albeit in a quick manner, placed gently on the ground.
Just another way to place it on the ground, without having to hold it and possibly get shot as you do so. You unvelcro the lanyard belt loop while the gun is hanging and lower it, or just let it hang, hands sky high (as far as they can possibly be from the gun), and let them secure it.
 

chewy352

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
769
Location
Harrah, Oklahoma
imported post

Decoligny wrote:
Only one suggestion for any future situations like this.

Position yourself appropriatelywith the knowledge that the Police will probably prone you out on the ground.

In other words, don't stand in, or in front of a puddle.

Move a little to one side or the other before the Police arrive.

Dry and cold is always more comfortable than wet and cold.
I take it you have never lived in Washington. Don't get me wrong i love the state but most of it is a puddle lol.
 

Capn Camo

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
165
Location
E TN
imported post

"
They of course cuffed me first, as I had the gun, and told me they were detaining me until they could sort the whole thing out. "

Then Id be talking to a lawyer. You (we) are authorized under RCW to bear arms to assist LEO. Not be arrested by them.
 

N6ATF

Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
1,401
Location
San Diego County, CA, California, USA
imported post

Capn Camo wrote:
"
They of course cuffed me first, as I had the gun, and told me they were detaining me until they could sort the whole thing out. "

Then Id be talking to a lawyer. You (we) are authorized under RCW to bear arms to assist LEO. Not be arrested by them.
Good point.
 

Johnny Law

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
462
Location
Puget Sound, ,
imported post

N6ATF wrote:
Capn Camo wrote:
"
They of course cuffed me first, as I had the gun, and told me they were detaining me until they could sort the whole thing out. "

Then Id be talking to a lawyer. You (we) are authorized under RCW to bear arms to assist LEO. Not be arrested by them.
Good point.
This is how these situations are handled by Police, and TRAKATAK was well aware of this. As for talking to a lawyer, I guaranteeyou would be wasting your time and money. The "assisting" you are referring to is ifREQUESTED by LE to assist. This is usually a bad idea except in extreme circumstances as thePD will now bear responsibility for a citizens actions, and most Cops are not willing to take a big risk on an unknown quantity. Also that was a detainment, not an arrest.
 

joeroket

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
3,339
Location
Everett, Washington, USA
imported post

N6ATF wrote:
Capn Camo wrote:
"
  They of course cuffed me first, as I had the gun, and told me they were detaining me until they could sort the whole thing out. "

Then Id be talking to a lawyer. You (we) are authorized under RCW to bear arms to assist LEO. Not be arrested by them.
Good point.

Except he was not assisting any LEO. He was ordering another citizen to the ground at gun point. The law allows it if we are acting under the officers command and in the officers aid. He was never acting under an officers command.
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
imported post

N6ATF wrote:
Capn Camo wrote:
"
They of course cuffed me first, as I had the gun, and told me they were detaining me until they could sort the whole thing out. "

Then Id be talking to a lawyer. You (we) are authorized under RCW to bear arms to assist LEO. Not be arrested by them.
Good point.

I don't know about anybody else, but no amount of "atta boys" from the cops is gonna make up for making me lay on wet pavement in 40-degree weather, getting cuffed, and put in a patrol car for half an hour when I was the good guy helping someone else.

Come on, already. Just putting down the gun or holstering it is plenty. If the cop can't tell who the good guy is froma few moments of interaction, plus the phone call and on-scene witnesses, something is really missing here. Like, judgement, maybe.

Give me a break.
 

N6ATF

Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
1,401
Location
San Diego County, CA, California, USA
imported post

Johnny Law wrote:
N6ATF wrote:
Capn Camo wrote:
"
They of course cuffed me first, as I had the gun, and told me they were detaining me until they could sort the whole thing out. "

Then Id be talking to a lawyer. You (we) are authorized under RCW to bear arms to assist LEO. Not be arrested by them.
Good point.
This is how these situations are handled by Police, and TRAKATAK was well aware of this. As for talking to a lawyer, I guaranteeyou would be wasting your time and money. The "assisting" you are referring to is ifREQUESTED by LE to assist. This is usually a bad idea except in extreme circumstances as thePD will now bear responsibility for a citizens actions, and most Cops are not willing to take a big risk on an unknown quantity. Also that was a detainment, not an arrest.
Call 911 on your hands-free, ask them if they want your assistance in arresting this attempted arsonist. If they say no, they bear responsibility for telling you to back off and let a massive explosion occur, if they say yes please, then they shouldn't arrest and unarrest you and try to get away with it by using the sick euphemism "detainment".
 

Johnny Law

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
462
Location
Puget Sound, ,
imported post

Citizen wrote:
I don't know about anybody else, but no amount of "atta boys" from the cops is gonna make up for making me lay on wet pavement in 40-degree weather, getting cuffed, and put in a patrol car for half an hour when I was the good guy helping someone else.

Come on, already. Just putting down the gun or holstering it is plenty. If the cop can't tell who the good guy is froma few moments of interaction, plus the phone call and on-scene witnesses, something is really missing here. Like, judgement, maybe.

Give me a break.
I understand your point, but you are only seeing a narrow view of the incident, from TRAK's perspective. What you don't know is that there were several passersby that called 911 and said that there was a fire, and some guy had a gun pointed at a person who is on the ground. Do you think the people who called 911 knew what was going on?Neither did the Copsarriving onscene, as it is very difficult to know who did what, and who is the bg. Add darkness and rain and a potential explosion, and you can begin to see this from a Cops perspective.

Police arrive = everyone is disarmed until the circumstances are sorted out.
 

TRAKATAK

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
55
Location
Puyallup, Washington, USA
imported post

Johnny Law, you hit the nail on the head. For any person on this website to think that the police were in any way out of order is denying the reality of the situation and they are, frankly, being delusional. Were I the police, I would have acted the same way if I came to the scene with the exact information they had been given. They didn't know me from Adam, so why should they take my word that I was a good guy until they could prove otherwise? All that serves is to put them, and others on scene, at potentially unnecessary increased risk.
 

Batousaii

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
1,226
Location
Kitsap Co., Washington, USA
imported post

TRAKATAK wrote:
Johnny Law, you hit the nail on the head. For any person on this website to think that the police were in any way out of order is denying the reality of the situation and they are, frankly, being delusional. Were I the police, I would have acted the same way if I came to the scene with the exact information they had been given. They didn't know me from Adam, so why should they take my word that I was a good guy until they could prove otherwise? All that serves is to put them, and others on scene, at potentially unnecessary increased risk.


Oh C'mon ...

-- Every one knows that Alliance players havegreen names over their heads, and the horde have red when PvP is turned on !.... WoW ...... it's common knowledge.

Seriously though, Both TRAK and Johny are correct in pointing out that everything is an "unknown" until police can identify who's who ... until then, it's just a chaotic situation.

- (years ago) I too helped pursue and stop an offender that had been throwingBudweiser beer cans from his car at another car on the freeway... (i was on my motorcycle, .45 on me) .. when we finally cornered the guy, and the cops caught up to us... they took my .45 for a few minutes.. getting it back came with a big thank you, a handshake, and compliment on weapon choice... I wasn't put on the ground, or handcuffed, because cops had been told who-was-who via 911 from other driver, but they secured my gun so i would not be out of their policy (as per a shoot) once they took control of the offender.

- So TRAK is correct in his expectation, and seems to have good comprehension of the other viewpoints around him.... well done.

- Well Done TRAK !

:cool:Bat
 

Ajetpilot

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2007
Messages
1,416
Location
Olalla, Kitsap County, Washington, USA
imported post

I agree. Well done TRAKATAK.

However, the treatment that you received may be one reason why some people simply would rather not get involved. Who wants to get put on the ground at gunpoint, cuffed, locked in the back of a police car, and detained for an unknown period of time?

Many people would rather just call 911 and keep on motoring, or worse, not even bother to call 911. They would rather letsomeone else go through that procedure.

I'm glad it was you who came across the situation and decided to act.

BZ.
 

Jeff Hayes

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
2,569
Location
Long gone
imported post

I stopped to help aLEO that was getting the crap beat out of him about 12 years ago. I jumped in to the fight got the BG off of him just about the same time help arrived. I got jumped on cuffed and bent over the trunk of a patrol car. TheLEO I rescued was telling the other LEOs that I had helped himand to turn me loose. I got jacked in the right kidney 2x before the LEO uncuffed me. I was OK with gettin cuffed untill they sorted things out but the LEO that punched me knew I was a good guy when he did me. I have not helped a LEO since. I was not armed that day.



Orphan
 

Bm7b5

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
4
Location
, ,
imported post

First, good on you for getting involved.

Second, this is not a criticism because I wasn't in your shoes and don't know all the facts, but I would have made every effort, if at all possible,to ensure I DID NOT have a gun in my hands when police arrived.
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
imported post

Johnny Law wrote:
Citizen wrote:
I don't know about anybody else, but no amount of "atta boys" from the cops is gonna make up for making me lay on wet pavement in 40-degree weather, getting cuffed, and put in a patrol car for half an hour when I was the good guy helping someone else.

Come on, already. Just putting down the gun or holstering it is plenty. If the cop can't tell who the good guy is froma few moments of interaction, plus the phone call and on-scene witnesses, something is really missing here. Like, judgement, maybe.

Give me a break.
I understand your point, but you are only seeing a narrow view of the incident, from TRAK's perspective. What you don't know is that there were several passersby that called 911 and said that there was a fire, and some guy had a gun pointed at a person who is on the ground. Do you think the people who called 911 knew what was going on?Neither did the Copsarriving onscene, as it is very difficult to know who did what, and who is the bg. Add darkness and rain and a potential explosion, and you can begin to see this from a Cops perspective.

Police arrive = everyone is disarmed until the circumstances are sorted out.

Except they didn't just disarm everybody. You missed the point entirely.

Its one thing to get the guns out of the way. Its something else to be face down in a puddle in 40-degree weather, cuffed, and stuffed in a patrol car for thirty minutes.

Refusal to use judgement. Apparently, the thought that there are armed good guys who have interrupted crimes beforenever entered their head until after the humiliating treatment.

If they just must get the potential for weapons out of the way, they can do a Terry pat down.

Give me a break.
 
Top