imported post
I am very please wi6ththe decision made bythe Riverside County Board of Supervisors.
This is exactly why I filed a Federal Lawsuit in San Diego against the San Diego Sheriff's Department.
The California Penal Code requires applicants for CCWs to be a "RESIDENT" of the issuing authorities jurisdiction,
NO MORE,
NO LESS.
The law and case decisions across the county hold that a person may have more than one
RESIDENCE but
ONLY ONE DOMICILE.
Yes, individuals may establishresidence in more than onecounty or jurisdiction.
I would argue that "
GOOD CAUSE" is defined by a community standard and not by a single individual.
With an elected body such as the Riverside County Board of Supervisors voting to establishthe community belief that self defense is
GOOD CAUSE,makes it much easier to argue the fact that the applicant is not the only one to believe it.
The Riverside County Sheriff's Department had proper notice in the form of a published agenda and the opportunity to present theirposition to theRiverside County Board of Supervisorsprior to their vote and chose not to.
If the legislature wanted otherwise, they would have reduced it to black and white and published it in the California Penal Code.
The issue of whether or not I am to be considered a RESIDENT of San Diego County while maintaining residences elsewhere will be the topic of a motion to dismiss my case on December 21, 2009 in the Federal District Court in San Diego.
Here is the link to more information on this topic.
http://ctgunrights.com/00.Webpages/CA.motion.to.Dismiss.htm
Read and listen to the information at this website and
JUDGE for yourself.
edperuta@amcable.tv
