• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Yet another family outing tarnished

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
imported post

deanf wrote:
it just means you have given up your right to be on the property because you violated their policy

There is never a right to be on private property, only a license. Excludes owner, of course. And since you are there under license, anything you do there you do under license. A license is not a right, it is a conditional permission.
I agree mostly with Deanf on this except that, when you open you doors to public as in a public business then the rules change, somewhat. Wether you agree with those rules or not.
 

joeroket

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
3,339
Location
Everett, Washington, USA
imported post

sudden valley gunner wrote:
deanf wrote:
it just means you have given up your right to be on the property because you violated their policy

There is never a right to be on private property, only a license. Excludes owner, of course. And since you are there under license, anything you do there you do under license. A license is not a right, it is a conditional permission.
I agree mostly with Deanf on this except that, when you open you doors to public as in a public business then the rules change, somewhat. Wether you agree with those rules or not.
The law agrees in whole with deanf though, unless you are being asked to leave for something covered under a protected class.
 

Solar

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
87
Location
, , USA
imported post

We do NOT have alloidial titles to our land. ALL property is subject to taxation and imminent domain laws. "Private" property? Not even close.
 

amlevin

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Messages
5,937
Location
North of Seattle, Washington, USA
imported post

David.Car wrote:
While I agree it probably isn't posted I have seen it in their written policy.

If you are going to carry into almost any mall in the country, concealed is your only option.
It might be interesting to know if their "written policy" is really there for the Employees of the mall, not the customers. Almost every employer in this country now has a "No Firearms" policy for their workers and knowing the limited ability of many managers to think for themselves, I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't attempting to apply an HR Policy to the general public. As for me, I see any sign prohibiting firearms on the premises, that is not supported by law (federal buildings, bars, schools, etc.) as a "Conceal your firearm" sign and sometimes I see it as a "Gun Owners go shop somewhere else" sign.

Based on recent events, who in their right mind would feel safe in a Mall without their firearm. Add to that Coffee Shops, Restaurants, Convenience Stores and many more public places.

Private Property owners may have the right to post their property but we, as gun owners who wish to carry, have the right to not shop in their establishments. We may not be the majority but in today's economy our dollars are even more important to their profits. Why the heck do you think Wal-Marts official policy is "follow State Law". As dumb as their employees may seem, those at the top realize that if one million gun owners take only one dollar somewhere else, that's one million dollars that they didn't make. It all adds up so never think our dollars are meaningless.
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
imported post

joeroket wrote:
sudden valley gunner wrote:
deanf wrote:
it just means you have given up your right to be on the property because you violated their policy

There is never a right to be on private property, only a license. Excludes owner, of course. And since you are there under license, anything you do there you do under license. A license is not a right, it is a conditional permission.
I agree mostly with Deanf on this except that, when you open you doors to public as in a public business then the rules change, somewhat. Wether you agree with those rules or not.
The law agrees in whole with deanf though, unless you are being asked to leave for something covered under a protected class.
Thats exactly what I meant.
 

David.Car

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
1,264
Location
Spokane, Washington, USA
imported post

amlevin wrote:
David.Car wrote:
While I agree it probably isn't posted I have seen it in their written policy.

If you are going to carry into almost any mall in the country, concealed is your only option.
It might be interesting to know if their "written policy" is really there for the Employees of the mall, not the customers. Almost every employer in this country now has a "No Firearms" policy for their workers and knowing the limited ability of many managers to think for themselves, I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't attempting to apply an HR Policy to the general public. As for me, I see any sign prohibiting firearms on the premises, that is not supported by law (federal buildings, bars, schools, etc.) as a "Conceal your firearm" sign and sometimes I see it as a "Gun Owners go shop somewhere else" sign.

Based on recent events, who in their right mind would feel safe in a Mall without their firearm. Add to that Coffee Shops, Restaurants, Convenience Stores and many more public places.

Private Property owners may have the right to post their property but we, as gun owners who wish to carry, have the right to not shop in their establishments. We may not be the majority but in today's economy our dollars are even more important to their profits. Why the heck do you think Wal-Marts official policy is "follow State Law". As dumb as their employees may seem, those at the top realize that if one million gun owners take only one dollar somewhere else, that's one million dollars that they didn't make. It all adds up so never think our dollars are meaningless.

That has been the case for places in the past, but what I saw was for consumers.

The mall goes by the same policy Northtown does, and that is basically the same policy almost every mall goes by...
 

amzbrady

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2009
Messages
3,521
Location
Marysville, Washington, USA
imported post

Orphan wrote:
I never OC in any of the malls in Spokane, because I know thatmost mallshave no carry policy's and just like M1gunr I do not go unarmed. I also only go to the mall 1 or 2 Xs per year anyway.

The OC movement is trying to make OC as common a sight as seeing someone with a cell phone. That goal is not going to be achieved by going places where you know you will attract a lot of negative attention. Each time one of us is involved in one of these encounters every bystander in the mall sees an armed individual being escorted off the premises I can guaranty that they think to them selves gun, bad, just look at what happened to that person. Not only that but the next time they see someone OCing somewhere else they will most likly feel the need to go complane to the managment because after all the last time this happenedat the mall the OCer was escorted to the door. Dont underestimate the do good mentality, a lot of people feel powerfull/important when they turn someone in like this. On the other hand if you are somewhere OCing that is acceptableor at least you dont know that you will get kicked out, people noticeyou have a weapon and nothing happens, no one gets shot, no one gets kicked out, after Joe public sees that happen 3 or 4 times they will cease even thinking about it and accept the fact some people carry.

The more we OC without negative encounters the faster we will be able to OC in the malls. The harder we try to jamb it down their throats the the more resistance we will receive. Be smart, win the war, dont start battles you cant win.

OK flame away



Orphan
This is also we there is such a dire need to get some positive video outthere, and lots of it, showing OC. The more documented OC we get out the more others will start to feel comfortable doing so. I have only OC carried a few times and probably felt more uncomfortable doing so than those around me who noticed. I was not in the majority. I thinkmy biggest worry wasnt so much confrontation with public, but theinconvenance with police, while they run my name, and detain me. Not something I want to have to deal with.
 

Jeff Hayes

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
2,569
Location
Long gone
imported post

amzbrady wrote:
Orphan wrote:
I never OC in any of the malls in Spokane, because I know thatmost mallshave no carry policy's and just like M1gunr I do not go unarmed. I also only go to the mall 1 or 2 Xs per year anyway.

The OC movement is trying to make OC as common a sight as seeing someone with a cell phone. That goal is not going to be achieved by going places where you know you will attract a lot of negative attention. Each time one of us is involved in one of these encounters every bystander in the mall sees an armed individual being escorted off the premises I can guaranty that they think to them selves gun, bad, just look at what happened to that person. Not only that but the next time they see someone OCing somewhere else they will most likly feel the need to go complane to the managment because after all the last time this happenedat the mall the OCer was escorted to the door. Dont underestimate the do good mentality, a lot of people feel powerfull/important when they turn someone in like this. On the other hand if you are somewhere OCing that is acceptableor at least you dont know that you will get kicked out, people noticeyou have a weapon and nothing happens, no one gets shot, no one gets kicked out, after Joe public sees that happen 3 or 4 times they will cease even thinking about it and accept the fact some people carry.

The more we OC without negative encounters the faster we will be able to OC in the malls. The harder we try to jamb it down their throats the the more resistance we will receive. Be smart, win the war, dont start battles you cant win.

OK flame away



Orphan
This is also we there is such a dire need to get some positive video outthere, and lots of it, showing OC. The more documented OC we get out the more others will start to feel comfortable doing so. I have only OC carried a few times and probably felt more uncomfortable doing so than those around me who noticed. I was not in the majority. I thinkmy biggest worry wasnt so much confrontation with public, but theinconvenance with police, while they run my name, and detain me. Not something I want to have to deal with.
While I am on the east side of the state and OC is generaly more acceptable here. I was a little nervious about 3 weeks ago I found myself standing 3 feet from the Spokane and Kootenai county Sheriffs, not theirdeputys. Fetch, Dwordinger and I were at the Sheriff Mack event in Post Falls Idaho all of us were OCing both Sheriffs noticed but never batted an eye. I OC 90% of the time every where I go with out incident. I am rertired and dress in jeans, boots and t shirts in the summer and flannel shirts in the winter so I do not believe I am being misrtaken for a LEO. We need more people OCing with out incident.

Just keep on carrying a little at a time, it gets easier the more you do it. That uncomfortable feeling will gradualy go away and be replaced by feeling funny when you are not OCing.Carry in places you know or at least think are OC frendly and work up from there.

Carry On

Orphan
 

David.Car

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
1,264
Location
Spokane, Washington, USA
imported post

Orphan wrote:
While I am on the east side of the state and OC is generaly more acceptable here. I was a little nervious about 3 weeks ago I found myself standing 3 feet from the Spokane and Kootenai county Sheriffs, not theirdeputys. Fetch, Dwordinger and I were at the Sheriff Mack event in Post Falls Idaho all of us were OCing both Sheriffs noticed but never batted an eye. I OC 90% of the time every where I go with out incident. I am rertired and dress in jeans, boots and t shirts in the summer and flannel shirts in the winter so I do not believe I am being misrtaken for a LEO. We need more people OCing with out incident.

Just keep on carrying a little at a time, it gets easier the more you do it. That uncomfortable feeling will gradualy go away and be replaced by feeling funny when you are not OCing.Carry in places you know or at least think are OC frendly and work up from there.

Carry On

Orphan
OC all the time in Spokane. When I am not working I am carrying and 95% of the time it is openly. Have never had a police encounter or negative confrontation. Quite the opposite, have had many good encounters, positive questions, and even thank yous.
 

compmanio365

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
2,013
Location
Pierce County, Washington, USA
imported post

OC all the time in Pierce County, south and north of here too........encountered many LEOs during my travels and only had 2 incidents to date, both of which became non-issues after a minute or two of conversation and a bit of conversation.
 

rickomatic

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
43
Location
, ,
imported post

While this may be an OC community that I support, there is a time and place for OC.
Just because I can legally walk down the middle of Alderwood mall dressed only in flip flops and a thong, I would bet that the mall owners might not want me to. It would naturally cause "alarm" among their patrons. Common sense tells me I should use a little discretion in my dress when out in public in certain places. You don't need to make an OC point every time you go out. Being polite to others, and understanding their fears, even ones not well founded, is not something we should be afraid of. If we know that OC at certain privately owned places is frowned upon, then live with it. Sometimes trying to stroke our own egos for our egos sake can give us the wrong outcome. Choose your battles carefully.
 

kito109654

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
533
Location
Sedro, Washington, USA
imported post

Re: Videotaping OC

I plan on doing this but I wanted to give a friendly warning to all. This will attract some attention, recording always does. Keep that in mind. Also be aware that photography and videography is even more restricted than firearms in businesses and malls. If you have the option, use a discreet camera that looks more like a point and shoot and less like an SLR or camcorder.
 

amzbrady

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2009
Messages
3,521
Location
Marysville, Washington, USA
imported post

kito109654 wrote:
Re: Videotaping OC

I plan on doing this but I wanted to give a friendly warning to all. This will attract some attention, recording always does. Keep that in mind. Also be aware that photography and videography is even more restricted than firearms in businesses and malls. If you have the option, use a discreet camera that looks more like a point and shoot and less like an SLR or camcorder.
Or have someone standing in the wings, concealed and have them tape it for you. Get a good zoom, a 2 story mall works best with them upstairs and you carring downstairs.
 

kito109654

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
533
Location
Sedro, Washington, USA
imported post

amzbrady wrote:
kito109654 wrote:
Re: Videotaping OC

I plan on doing this but I wanted to give a friendly warning to all. This will attract some attention, recording always does. Keep that in mind. Also be aware that photography and videography is even more restricted than firearms in businesses and malls. If you have the option, use a discreet camera that looks more like a point and shoot and less like an SLR or camcorder.
Or have someone standing in the wings, concealed and have them tape it for you. Get a good zoom, a 2 story mall works best with them upstairs and you carring downstairs.
Ever tried to conceal that you were running a camcorder and recording something far away? It's super conspicuous.
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
imported post

kito109654 wrote:
Re: Videotaping OC

I plan on doing this but I wanted to give a friendly warning to all. This will attract some attention, recording always does. Keep that in mind. Also be aware that photography and videography is even more restricted than firearms in businesses and malls. If you have the option, use a discreet camera that looks more like a point and shoot and less like an SLR or camcorder.
Or PM TechnoWeenie he'll hook you up, I use qik on the cell that works pretty good too.
 

kito109654

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
533
Location
Sedro, Washington, USA
imported post

sudden valley gunner wrote:
kito109654 wrote:
Re: Videotaping OC

I plan on doing this but I wanted to give a friendly warning to all. This will attract some attention, recording always does. Keep that in mind. Also be aware that photography and videography is even more restricted than firearms in businesses and malls. If you have the option, use a discreet camera that looks more like a point and shoot and less like an SLR or camcorder.
Or PM TechnoWeenie he'll hook you up, I use qik on the cell that works pretty good too.
Hook us up with what? Has he got some spy equipment? :celebrate

Good idea on the cell... though, I'm rather partial to HD video, myself. ;)
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
imported post

Techno has all kinda discrete"spy" equipment that works fairly well, I wish I had one when I was illegally detained twice in one day. Would have worked great.
 

XD45PlusP

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2007
Messages
250
Location
, ,
imported post

deanf wrote:
Can you tell the Cops to "NOT" carry on your property? Irregardless, if they are investigating a crime, or if they just pop on over and say "Hi" to you and your family.

Off the top of my head, I would say this:

Cops, while on official duty, are The State. We have delegated the authority to carry guns to certain arms of The State via our form of government.

With cops, it's not about the right to carry a gun. The government doesn't have rights, it only has authority. Only the people have rights.

But to answer your question: No to the first part (investigating a crime, ie: in hot pursuit, or under exigent circumstances) and Yes to the second part, a social contact.

Now, I would ask you to defend any belief you have that there is an individual right to carry a gun on private property.

Hi deanf, thanks for the reply. Sorry bout not replying sooner. Been very busy lately.

If we're talking about "shopping malls", you might want to consider this:

Do we have a Constitutional Right under the WA Constitution to bear arms? Yes. Ok.

Also depends on if the business in question has a policy of permitting or welcoming non-commercial, community or political activities onto the property. And "the scope of the invitation that the owner of the property has extended to the public"

Is the mall a Public Forum?

You might want to take a look at these cases. And AG Opinion.

http://www.sos.wa.gov/elections/pdf/AGo_On_Political_Activity_at_Shopping_Centers.pdf

  • Initiative 172 v. Western Washington Fair Association, 88 Wn. App. 579, 945 P.2d 761 (1997);
  • Waremart Inc. v. Progressive Campaigns, Inc., 139 Wn.2d 623, 989 P.2d 524 (1999);
  • Southcenter Joint Venture v. National Democratic Policy Committee., 113 Wn.2d 413, 780 P.2d 1282 (1989);
  • Alderwood Associates v. Washington Environmental Council, 96 Wn.2d 230, 635 P.2d 108 (1981).
Can you apply Article I Section 24 as a Protected Right? I think you can. Can you apply it at the mall? Yes. Same way you can apply the Initiative Right guaranteed in the WA Constitution! (Article II Section 1) And Article I Section 5 (Free Speech)

Now, I'm not saying that this is how the WA SC would rule, I am merely saying that this same argument could be used. As in the previous cases.

Now, as far as Private Property goes. You might not agree with me, but this is how I see it.

I don't think that cops while on duty are the state. I simply don't think that statutory authority or statutory laws are above my Constitutional Rights, or better yet Unalienable Rights. My body, is MY PROPERTY. Just because I come onto private property doesn't mean they get to control my body.

Does me carrying interfere with your statutory property rights? If it does please explain? How are you injured? Heck, the mall could say "No Drugs" either and they probably already do say it, in their code of conduct. But how does this apply to say a diabetic, or asthma sufferer? Can't take your insulin, or inhaler in the mall cause hey you would be violating their code of conduct right? The mall would be liable. What about No blacks? Or Asians?

By your logic, how can the state occupy the entire field of firearms, except for the discharge and some other stuff, which I will not get into. But how can the state say, that say Seattle, which under the idiotic Mayor McCheeses argument that they are invoking a Private Property Right be wrong? So you agree with him? Not all of Seattle is Public Property, and there are conditions.Example; you cannot just walk into the mayors office, or the city council chambers, even though it is Public Property. How do YOU make the distinction?

I'm just invoking discussion, not trying to cause a problem....

What I thinkthat we might be differing on opinions is Open To The Public "Private Property" and Just Your Private Property, like your home. Please let me know if I am wrong.

XD

PS: If I'm invited or allowed to enter, irregardless of mall property or "Your" property there can be no conditions on my Constitutional Rights. If you don't like it, don't open your Property to me, or the Public at large. Now if I were to trespass illegally then yes, Illegally is the question though. ie (Burglary) Codes Of Conduct do not obsolve me of my Constitutional Rights. Nor do they grant YOU the right to take them away.
 

lockman

State Researcher
Joined
Aug 19, 2006
Messages
1,193
Location
Elgin, Illinois, USA
imported post

And th business is operating under license from the state/county or city so laws can be passed eliminating the no gun policy in places were the general public is allowed.
 

Capn Camo

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
165
Location
E TN
imported post

Vandal wrote:
Bennie, it sucks that they ruined your day, but he few lost dollars from the staunch gun rights community will not make a dent in the profits of a mall or store. Also, you don't have a right to carry on private property and they can ban virtually anything they want. I CC when I go to a place I know is not OC friendly, they won't worry about what they cannot see. If it's posted, CC, we do have that option.

Is this deliberate, or accidental FALSE INFORMATION?


A MALL IN WA STATE IS NOT PRIVATE PROPERTY.

ITS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

READ THE LAW, PEOPLE:


9A.52.070 and 9A.52.080, it is a defense that:

(1) A building involved in an offense under RCW 9A.52.070 was abandoned; or

(2) The premises were at the time open to members of the public and the actor complied with all lawful conditions imposed on access to or remaining in the premises; or

(3) The actor reasonably believed that the owner of the premises, or other person empowered to license access thereto, would have licensed him to enter or remain; or <snip>


Is this just ignorance, or are there Subversives hanging out here?
Read AGO McKennas Opinion which upholds this:

http://www.atg.wa.gov/opinion.aspx?section=archive&id=21188

----------------
OP is going about this all backwards. Go there and DARE them to do anything about it, especially with a tape recorder in hand.

I DO.
 
Top