Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: AB 357

  1. #1
    Regular Member Gundude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sandy Eggo County
    Posts
    1,691

    Post imported post

    I saw on a previous post something about AB357 changing the "may issue" to "shall issue". The search thingy here timed out, soI can't find what happened with that bill. Can someone bring me up to date on what happened with it? Thanks.
    A citizen may not be required to offer a ―good and substantial reason-- why he should be permitted to exercise his rights. The right‘s existence is all the reason he needs.

  2. #2
    Regular Member mjones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    SoCal, , USA
    Posts
    979

    Post imported post

    Gundude wrote:
    I saw on a previous post something about AB357 changing the "may issue" to "shall issue". The search thingy here timed out, soI can't find what happened with that bill. Can someone bring me up to date on what happened with it? Thanks.
    If I remember correctly the author pulled it while it was in committee.

  3. #3
    Founder's Club Member MudCamper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Sebastopol, California, USA
    Posts
    710

    Post imported post

    mjones wrote:
    Gundude wrote:
    I saw on a previous post something about AB357 changing the "may issue" to "shall issue". The search thingy here timed out, soI can't find what happened with that bill. Can someone bring me up to date on what happened with it? Thanks.
    If I remember correctly the author pulled it while it was in committee.
    After it failed to get enough votes in that committee.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •