• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Congress: Passengers Can Bring Guns on Amtrak Trains

2a4all

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
1,846
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
imported post

Since Amtrack can only check baggage at 1/3 of its stations, then this bill should be modified to require that passengers keep their firearms in their possession.
 

Tomahawk

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
5,117
Location
4 hours south of HankT, ,
imported post

2a4all wrote:
Since Amtrack can only check baggage at 1/3 of its stations, then this bill should be modified to require that passengers keep their firearms in their possession.

Exactly what I was thinking. But I imagine most of the people who support this bill, including the NRA bigwigs, don't travel on Amtrak enough to be aware of it.

I have traveled long distance several times on Amtrak, and I never check my baggage, because I usually have two carry-ons and I just drag them into my sleeper cabin with me.

One of the things that worries me is that Amtrak will become more like air travel, where the TSA morons start rifling through your stuff (and stealing it, like they do at airports). The lack of pointless security is one of the best reasons for taking the train.
 

Hawkflyer

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
3,309
Location
Prince William County, Virginia, USA
imported post

Actually it was not so long ago that you could carry firearms in your CARRY ON baggage when riding Amtrak. In fact, the last time I took the train to the mid-west I took 4 handguns in carry on. The requirement was that they had to be disassembled and that you could not carry any ammo.

Just imagine being in the train station in DC, with a suitcase full of handguns and then having a 4 hour layover in Chicago, all the while waiting for someone to search your bags.

Regards
 

Venator

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
6,462
Location
Lansing area, Michigan, USA
imported post

I inquired about this a few years ago and Amtrak replied that the no guns was a policy and that they would kick you off the train at the next stop, but no arrest, depending on where they dropped you off at.

So where is the LAW that can punish a person for bringing a firearm on a train?
 

tekshogun

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
1,052
Location
Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
imported post

Venator wrote:
I inquired about this a few years ago and Amtrak replied that the no guns was a policy and that they would kick you off the train at the next stop, but no arrest, depending on where they dropped you off at.

So where is the LAW that can punish a person for bringing a firearm on a train?

Is it not considered private property? They can make you leave. You don't have to be arrested, but the moment you refuse to leave, they can arrest you (if they have their own police/security detail) or another LEO can.
 

Tawnos

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Messages
2,542
Location
Washington
imported post

tekshogun wrote:
Venator wrote:
I inquired about this a few years ago and Amtrak replied that the no guns was a policy and that they would kick you off the train at the next stop, but no arrest, depending on where they dropped you off at.

So where is the LAW that can punish a person for bringing a firearm on a train?

Is it not considered private property? They can make you leave. You don't have to be arrested, but the moment you refuse to leave, they can arrest you (if they have their own police/security detail) or another LEO can.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amtrak

The National Railroad Passenger Corporation, doing business as Amtrak (reporting mark AMTK), is a government-owned corporation that was organized on May 1, 1971 to provide intercity passenger train service in the United States. "Amtrak" is a portmanteau of the words "America" and "track".[1] It is headquartered at Union Station in Washington, DC.[2]
 

tekshogun

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
1,052
Location
Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
imported post

Tawnos wrote:
tekshogun wrote:
Venator wrote:
I inquired about this a few years ago and Amtrak replied that the no guns was a policy and that they would kick you off the train at the next stop, but no arrest, depending on where they dropped you off at.

So where is the LAW that can punish a person for bringing a firearm on a train?

Is it not considered private property? They can make you leave. You don't have to be arrested, but the moment you refuse to leave, they can arrest you (if they have their own police/security detail) or another LEO can.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amtrak

The National Railroad Passenger Corporation, doing business as Amtrak (reporting mark AMTK), is a government-owned corporation that was organized on May 1, 1971 to provide intercity passenger train service in the United States. "Amtrak" is a portmanteau of the words "America" and "track".[1] It is headquartered at Union Station in Washington, DC.[2]

Ah, well, you learn something new everyday! Of course, they do have Amtrak Police.

Interesting, thanks!
 

Mike

Site Co-Founder
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
8,706
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
imported post

tekshogun wrote:
Is it not considered private property?
Actually its a governmental agency, as the S. Ct. hs ruled for First Amendment purposes. See http://law.jrank.org/pages/12693/Lebron-v-National-Railroad-Passenger-Corporation.html

\There is no federal law, and fe state laws, making it illegal for you to carry on AMTRAk trains. Even AMTRAK's web site published rules do not ban carry of guns.

See discussion at http://law.jrank.org/pages/12693/Lebron-v-National-Railroad-Passenger-Corporation.html
 

Tomahawk

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
5,117
Location
4 hours south of HankT, ,
imported post

Mike wrote:
tekshogun wrote:
Is it not considered private property?
Actually its a governmental agency, as the S. Ct. hs ruled for First Amendment purposes. See http://law.jrank.org/pages/12693/Lebron-v-National-Railroad-Passenger-Corporation.html

There is no federal law, and fe state laws, making it illegal for you to carry on AMTRAk trains. Even AMTRAK's web site published rules do not ban carry of guns.

See discussion at http://law.jrank.org/pages/12693/Lebron-v-National-Railroad-Passenger-Corporation.html

Yes, but if you open carry, I bet that changes quick!

In any case, Amtrak travels through a lot of no-carry states, making it difficult not to break state laws while trying to avoid breaking Amtrak rules. Amtrak's major hub stations are in places like Chicago, DC, and New York. Chicago, in particular, is the usual layover between trains crossing the continent. Watch what you do out there, folks.
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
imported post

Tomahawk wrote:
Mike wrote:
tekshogun wrote:
Is it not considered private property?
Actually its a governmental agency, as the S. Ct. hs ruled for First Amendment purposes. See http://law.jrank.org/pages/12693/Lebron-v-National-Railroad-Passenger-Corporation.html

There is no federal law, and fe state laws, making it illegal for you to carry on AMTRAk trains. Even AMTRAK's web site published rules do not ban carry of guns.

See discussion at http://law.jrank.org/pages/12693/Lebron-v-National-Railroad-Passenger-Corporation.html

Yes, but if you open carry, I bet that changes quick!

In any case, Amtrak travels through a lot of no-carry states, making it difficult not to break state laws while trying to avoid breaking Amtrak rules. Amtrak's major hub stations are in places like Chicago, DC, and New York. Chicago, in particular, is the usual layover between trains crossing the continent. Watch what you do out there, folks.

And in Washington you have to have a CPL to carry openly in a vehicle. Our state ferries are considered extensions of the highway/rd. system. Not sure about the trains.

So if I took train from here to Eastern Washington and didn't cross state lines I wonder what the policy isor what would happen?
 

UtahJarhead

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
312
Location
Ogden, UT, ,
imported post

You guys hit on a point I was just thinking. While it's a government agency, Washington DC has already banned its subjects from owning handguns (Heller be damned it seems), they've already set the precedent for banning it anywhere federal like EVERY federal building in the country and of course Amtrak. :(
 

tekshogun

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
1,052
Location
Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
imported post

And does the Federal government own all of the interstate rail lines? I honestly don't know as I am guessing a sizable portion of it is or at least was privately owned being that the Feds transfered land to private ownership to encourage building of rail lines in the 1800's.
 

UtahJarhead

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
312
Location
Ogden, UT, ,
imported post

That won't matter who owns it. If the Fed doesn't own it, they're leasing it and therefore it falls under their jurisdiction for their rules that they want to implement. I don't agree with it, but that's how it is. :(
 

okboomer

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
1,164
Location
Oklahoma, USA
imported post

Ummm, I know the folks that run the Southern Ohio & Northern Kentucky Short Line Rail Road that runs out of Cincinnati. It is a privately owned "short line" rail road that does "day trips" on the weekends for passengers. It does cross state lines and is NOT leased by the government in any way shape or form. They would set their own policies about gun carry.
 

Tomahawk

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
5,117
Location
4 hours south of HankT, ,
imported post

IIRC the only tracks Amtrak owns are the high speed electric line on the Northeast Corridor, which were once built and owned by the Pennsylvania RR.

Amtrak pays freight railroads to use their tracks, such as CSX, Union Pacific, etc.

Maybe some of the trackage in cities or other special areas is government-owned, but most of it is private property.
 

buster81

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
1,461
Location
Richmond, Virginia, USA
imported post

http://congress.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/12/16/president-signs-bill-that-allows-gun-slinging-amtrak-passengers-to-be-locked-in-boxes/

December 16, 2009


President Signs Bill That Allows Gun-Slinging AMTRAK Passengers to be Locked in Boxes


Harry Houdini made a career escaping from locked boxes. So did David Copperfield and Doug Henning.

And now you can add AMTRAK passengers packing heat in their luggage to that list of escape artists.

It sounds absurd. But President Obama actually signed a bill into law Wednesday that requires passengers who carry firearms aboard AMTRAK be locked in boxes for their journey.

It’s a mistake. But for now, the clerical error is the law of the land.

Earlier this week, Congress sent the president a massive spending bill that funded dozens of federal departments. Tucked into the transportation section of the legislation are safety requirements for AMTRAK customers who carry firearms on board the government-backed train system. The bill Congress passed mandates that passengers with firearms declare they have weapons with them in advance and stow them in locked boxes while on the train.

The bill text was correct when the House approved the legislation last week and the Senate followed suit Sunday. But somewhere in between, the language that referred to putting the guns in locked boxes morphed into stuffing “passengers” into locked boxes.

Aides to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) became aware of the problem Wednesday night as the House voted on its final slate of bills for the year. Pelosi’s staff tried to negotiate with Republican aides to see if they would agree to change the text of the bill without revoting the entire piece of legislation. But it was all for naught as Mr. Obama had already signed the measure into law.

It’s clear the typo alters the intent of the legislation. But no one quite knows the origin of the mistake.

Senior Congressional sources familiar with the error suggested the problem may have been introduced in the

“enrolling” process of bills. Once both the House and Senate approve the final version of a bill, the text of the legislation is sent to an “enrolling clerk” who actually copies the bill onto parchment paper. The parchment version of the package is then sent to the White House for the president to sign into law. Another theory is that the mistake could be something as simple as a printing error. The House and Senate run multiple versions of bills before they send the final copy to the White House to become law. Another possibility is that Congress sent President Obama the wrong, non-proofed version of the bill to sign.

The misfire is fixable. But probably not until early next year. The House late Wednesday completed what it expects to be its final session of the year. The Senate remains in session debating health care reform. But both the House and Senate would have to agree to a technical correction of the text that missed its mark.

The error is reminiscent of $289 billion farm bill President Bush vetoed in May, 2008. In that instance, both houses of Congress inadvertently sent Mr. Bush an incomplete bill, leaving out a 35-page chunk. The president then vetoed an incomplete bill. Congress discovered the error when lawmakers attempted to override the president’s veto.

In that case, House re-passed the entire farm bill and overrode Mr. Bush’s veto.

“This bill is one of the most-passed bills we’ve done,” quipped House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) at the time.

The rules to allow AMTRAK passengers to carry weapons with them are new. Airline passengers have long been permitted to transport weapons in checked luggage. But AMTRAK banned firearms from its trains after September 11th. Only police officers are now allowed to board AMTRAK trains with guns.

Rep. John Fleming (R-MS) and Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) are the primary advocates of the AMTRAK gun provision.
 
Top