• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Carrico files HB 69: Tenth Amendment bill

Repeater

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
2,498
Location
Richmond, Virginia, USA
imported post

Here it is:

HB 69 Firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition manufactured and retained in Virginia.

[align=center]HOUSE BILL NO. 69[/align] [align=center]Offered January 13, 2010[/align] [align=center]Prefiled December 29, 2009[/align] [align=left]A BILL to amend the Code of Virginia by adding a section numbered 18.2-308.2:4, relating to firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition manufactured and retained in Virginia.[/align] [align=center]----------[/align] [align=center]Patron-- Carrico[/align] [align=center]----------[/align] [align=center]Committee Referral Pending[/align] [align=center]----------[/align] Whereas, the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees to the states and their people all powers not granted to the federal government elsewhere in the Constitution; and[align=left]Whereas, the 9th Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees to the people rights not enumerated in the Constitution; and[/align] [align=left]Whereas, the regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the 9th and 10th Amendments to the United States Constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of commerce pertaining to the intrastate manufacture of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition; and[/align] [align=left]Whereas, the 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution reserves to the people the right to keep and bear arms; and Whereas Article 1, Section 13 of the Constitution of Virginia clearly secures the right of Virginia citizens to keep and bear arms; now, therefore[/align][align=left]Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:[/align] [align=left]1. That the Code of Virginia is amended by adding a section numbered 18.2-308.2:4 as follows:[/align] [align=left]§ 18.2-308.2:4. Exemption of firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition manufactured in Virginia from federal regulation.[/align] [align=left]A. As used in this section:[/align] [align=left]"Ammunition" means the combination of a cartridge, projectile, primer, or propellant designed for use in a firearm other than an antique firearm as defined in § 18.2-308.2:2.[/align] [align=left]"Basic materials" include but are not limited to unmachined steel and unshaped wood.[/align] [align=left]"Firearm" means any handgun, shotgun, or rifle that will or is designed to expel single or multiple projectiles by action of an explosion of combustible material.[/align] [align=left]"Firearm accessory" means an item used in conjunction with or mounted upon a firearm, but which is not essential to the basic function of the firearm, including but not limited to telescopic or laser sights, magazines, flash or sound suppressors, folding or aftermarket stocks and grips, speedloaders, ammunition carriers, and lights for target illumination.[/align] [align=left]"Generic and insignificant parts" include but are not limited to springs, screws, nuts, and pins.[/align] [align=left]"Manufactured" means that a firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition has been created from basic materials for functional usefulness, including but not limited to forging, casting, machining, or other processes for working materials.[/align] [align=left]B. Firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition that are manufactured commercially or privately in Virginia, and that remain within the borders of Virginia, shall not be subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of the United States Congress to regulate interstate commerce. Such firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition are deemed to have not traveled in interstate commerce. This section shall be applicable to firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition that are manufactured in Virginia from basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported from another state. The importation into Virginia of generic or insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications other than firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition and that are incorporated into firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition manufactured in Virginia shall not subject the firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition to federal regulation. Basic materials used for manufacturing shall not be considered firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition for purposes of this section, and shall not be subject to the authority of the United States Congress to regulate the interstate commerce of firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition as if they actually were firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition simply because the basic materials are used in the manufacture of firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition in Virginia. Firearms accessories that are imported into Virginia from another state and that are subject to federal regulation as being in interstate commerce shall not subject a firearm manufactured in Virginia to federal regulation under interstate commerce because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm manufactured in Virginia.[/align] [align=left]C. This section shall not apply to:[/align] [align=left]1. A firearm that cannot be carried and used by one person;[/align] [align=left]2. A firearm that has a bore diameter greater than one and one-half inches and that used smokeless powder, and not black powder, as a propellant;[/align] [align=left]3. Ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or[/align] [align=left]4. A firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with open activation of the trigger or other firing device.[/align] [align=left]D. In order to fall under the purview of this section, any firearm manufactured and sold in Virginia shall have the words "Made in Virginia" clearly stamped on a central metallic part, such as on the receiver or the frame.[/align] [align=left]E. This section shall apply to firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition that are manufactured and retained in Virginia on or after July 1, 2010.[/align]
 

simmonsjoe

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
1,661
Location
Mattaponi, Virginia, United States
imported post


[align=left]
3. Ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or
[/align][align=left]
4. A firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with open activation of the trigger or other firing device.
[/align]I was so happy! Then my heart was broken.
Conspicuous absence of Armor Piercing rounds.

How can you have a modern firearm, specifically fit for the Militia, without selective fire?
 

45acpForMe

Newbie
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
2,805
Location
Yorktown, Virginia, USA
imported post

simmonsjoe wrote:
3. Ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or 4. A firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with open activation of the trigger or other firing device.
I was so happy! Then my heart was broken. Conspicuous absence of Armor Piercing rounds.

How can you have a modern firearm, specifically fit for the Militia, without selective fire?

+1

If we are going to assert our states rights why be limited by federal bans on fully auto guns or bullet options?

Currently a police dept. can order a new H&K MP5 9mm fully auto for around $900. Us as private citizens have to buy pre-1986 models in limited supply after paying the ATF tax stamp and getting local sheriff approval. So you get a 25 year old gun for the amazing low price of$18,000. That is 20x the cost a new one!!!!

If we manufactured fully auto weapons in VA the price would allow the average citizen to acquire one.

Here is a Virginia made fully auto gun that we could buy if this legislation didn't have those limitations.

http://www.kriss-tdi.com/products/kriss-smg-45-acp.html
 

peter nap

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
13,551
Location
Valhalla
imported post

45acpForMe wrote:
simmonsjoe wrote:
How can you have a modern firearm, specifically fit for the Militia, without selective fire?
We don't need no seelective fire:p
We need BIG BOOLITS :D
bazooka.jpg
 

2a4all

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
1,846
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
imported post

If you travel to another state with your "Made In Virginia" firearm, will you be in possession of a prohibited weapon under either federal law or the laws of that state?

What about reciprocity with other states with similar legislation? Would Virginia honor weapons made in those states as "legitimate weapons"?
 

Repeater

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
2,498
Location
Richmond, Virginia, USA
imported post

simmonsjoe wrote:

[align=left]
4. A firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with open activation of the trigger or other firing device.
[/align]
How can you have a modern firearm, specifically fit for the Militia, without selective fire?
Because subdivision 4 is the last one, it would be easy to delete it.

It would be nice for the House to do just that, then send it over to Senate Courts of Justice for Howell, Marsh, and Saslaw to review.

It's not like they're going to vote for the bill anyway.
 

peter nap

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
13,551
Location
Valhalla
imported post

Repeater wrote:
simmonsjoe wrote:

[align=left]
4. A firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with open activation of the trigger or other firing device.
[/align]
How can you have a modern firearm, specifically fit for the Militia, without selective fire?
Because subdivision 4 is the last one, it would be easy to delete it.

It would be nice for the House to do just that, then send it over to Senate Courts of Justice for Howell, Marsh, and Saslaw to review.

It's not like they're going to vote for the bill anyway.
And that is the big problem with a lot of these bills coming up.
 

2a4all

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
1,846
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
imported post

Any manufacturer who would endeavour to make firearms that comply with this statute will need a market. How about adding a requirement that all local and stateLEAs purchase "Made in Virginia" firearms? For that matter, how about furnishing them to the VNG?

Why limit this to firearms? Why not tobacco and alcohol?
 

45acpForMe

Newbie
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
2,805
Location
Yorktown, Virginia, USA
imported post

2a4all wrote:
Any manufacturer who would endeavour to make firearms that comply with this statute will need a market. How about adding a requirement that all local and stateLEAs purchase "Made in Virginia" firearms? For that matter, how about furnishing them to the VNG?

Why limit this to firearms? Why not tobacco and alcohol?

Good idea.

I will sign up to buy one of these as soon as it is legal!!!!
 

VaLiberty

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
83
Location
Virginia
imported post

2a4all wrote:
If you travel to another state with your "Made In Virginia" firearm, will you be in possession of a prohibited weapon under either federal law or the laws of that state?

What about reciprocity with other states with similar legislation? Would Virginia honor weapons made in those states as "legitimate weapons"?

Pretty sure that is where the interstate commerce clause comes into play.
 

2a4all

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
1,846
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
imported post

VaLiberty wrote:
2a4all wrote:
If you travel to another state with your "Made In Virginia" firearm, will you be in possession of a prohibited weapon under either federal law or the laws of that state?

What about reciprocity with other states with similar legislation? Would Virginia honor weapons made in those states as "legitimate weapons"?

Pretty sure that is where the interstate commerce clause comes into play.
But would it? Suppose that "other state" was an adjacent state (like TN), and your trip there didn't involve the sale of a firearm, where's the "interstate commerce"? Your "Made in Virginia" firearm shouldn't treatedbe any differently than your shoes.
 

nova

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2007
Messages
3,149
Location
US
imported post

45acpForMe wrote:
2a4all wrote:
Any manufacturer who would endeavour to make firearms that comply with this statute will need a market. How about adding a requirement that all local and stateLEAs purchase "Made in Virginia" firearms? For that matter, how about furnishing them to the VNG?

Why limit this to firearms? Why not tobacco and alcohol?

Good idea.

I will sign up to buy one of these as soon as it is legal!!!!
apparently you can already buy a semi-auto version in SBR format :dude:
I'd love one with a happy switch :celebrate
 

nova

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2007
Messages
3,149
Location
US
imported post

Thing about this is, the feds will use the "commerce clause" because the raw materials that the gun is made from came from out of state.
 

VaLiberty

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
83
Location
Virginia
imported post

nova wrote:
Thing about this is, the feds will use the "commerce clause" because the raw materials that the gun is made from came from out of state.

That I doubt, but transporting finished goods across state lines does invoke their power.
 

SouthernBoy

Regular Member
Joined
May 12, 2007
Messages
5,837
Location
Western Prince William County, Virginia, USA
imported post

VaLiberty wrote:
nova wrote:
Thing about this is, the feds will use the "commerce clause" because the raw materials that the gun is made from came from out of state.

That I doubt, but transporting finished goods across state lines does invoke their power.
"To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;"

The above is the much-maligned "commerce clause" as it appears under Section 8 - Powers of Congress in the Constitution. Under Section 9 - Limits on Congress, we see this sentence;

"No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another."


Nowhere in either of these sentences from the Constitution is there any mention of our government controlling commerce in the sense of retrictions or regulations for firearms or for that matter, just about anything else. The first sentence simply begins with, "To regulate Commerce..". This means to "keep and make regular", not to control and dictate.
 

VaLiberty

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
83
Location
Virginia
imported post

SouthernBoy wrote
"To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;"

The above is the much-maligned "commerce clause" as it appears under Section 8 - Powers of Congress in the Constitution. Under Section 9 - Limits on Congress, we see this sentence;

"No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another."


Nowhere in either of these sentences from the Constitution is there any mention of our government controlling commerce in the sense of retrictions or regulations for firearms or for that matter, just about anything else. The first sentence simply begins with, "To regulate Commerce..". This means to "keep and make regular", not to control and dictate.
I'm not arguing the verbiage, nor do I disagree with your points, I am merely highlighting the modern interpretation.
 

45acpForMe

Newbie
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
2,805
Location
Yorktown, Virginia, USA
imported post

nova wrote:
45acpForMe wrote:
I will sign up to buy one of these as soon as it is legal!!!!
apparently you can already buy a semi-auto version in SBR format :dude:
I'd love one with a happy switch :celebrate
Yes a few months back I got an email from TDI saying that I could now legally convert my KRISS/CRB to the SRB (short barrel).

I investigated the cost and for a threaded barrel the conversion was about $400 but it is still considered a class III firearm so you would need to get an ATF tax stamp etc.

I decided to keep the longer barrel for accuracy. I can hit targets at 100 yards with 5-6" groupings whereas the "professionals" that tested the SBR and SMG (short barrel machine gun) only got 12" groupings at 100 yards.

I would love a 2-3 burst mode as well as fully auto. But since this gun was invented "after" 1986 that will never happen unless the laws change.
 

simmonsjoe

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
1,661
Location
Mattaponi, Virginia, United States
imported post

2a4all wrote:
VaLiberty wrote:
2a4all wrote:
If you travel to another state with your "Made In Virginia" firearm, will you be in possession of a prohibited weapon under either federal law or the laws of that state?

What about reciprocity with other states with similar legislation? Would Virginia honor weapons made in those states as "legitimate weapons"?

Pretty sure that is where the interstate commerce clause comes into play.
But would it? Suppose that "other state" was an adjacent state (like TN), and your trip there didn't involve the sale of a firearm, where's the "interstate commerce"? Your "Made in Virginia" firearm shouldn't treatedbe any differently than your shoes.
They only have the right to regulate interstate COMMERCE. If you hand your personally owned rifle cross borders, it is not commerce. There are no states I'm aware of who require a firearm to have serial numbers. Your only concern, if you moved out of VA would be to make sure the weapon fit your new states laws.

NOVA Your argument is tired, played, and false. The feds already define what level of materials can be imported without being a firearms. Ever heard of a firearm made with a PCR??? I have met people with privately built firearms built in their garage with these parts. No serial numbers, 100% legal.
Read it up on www.ar15.com
Also, if you read HB69 completely, you will see it defines all that stuff as well.
 

TFred

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
7,750
Location
Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
imported post

45acpForMe wrote:
I would love a 2-3 burst mode as well as fully auto. But since this gun was invented "after" 1986 that will never happen unless the laws change.
That's an interesting idea, mechanically. Are there any weapons that currently do this? It would seem to violate the "0, 1, Infinity" rule, which as far as I know, has never applied to firearms to begin with. :)

TFred
 
Top