Rusty
Regular Member
imported post
Reading those emails, they need some grammar training as well. I mean... ouch.
Reading those emails, they need some grammar training as well. I mean... ouch.
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Full Records Request from Sunnyvale PD
- Thread starter bad_ace
- Start date
Streetbikerr6
Regular Member
imported post
Rusty wrote:
Rusty wrote:
I did not read in depth but I saw some internet slang. Most grammer mistakes happen in private conversations like texting back and forth and the person just does not care, so I don't blame them. Although they should realize anything they discuss is available to the same people that pay their paychecks, especially when we have diligent friends here such as bad_ace!
yelohamr
Regular Member
imported post
When on an UOC group outing, wear bags over your heads for the group picture. :lol:
When on an UOC group outing, wear bags over your heads for the group picture. :lol:
Gundude
Regular Member
imported post
yelohamr wrote:
I have a pr of Groucho glasses. But I read somewhere, you can't wear a mask and carry.
edit: found it.
Possession of a Firearm While Wearing a Mask: It is a crime to possess a firearm in a public place or on any public street while masked so as to hide the identity of the person carrying the firearm. (Penal Code 12040).
yelohamr wrote:
I have a pr of Groucho glasses. But I read somewhere, you can't wear a mask and carry.
edit: found it.
Possession of a Firearm While Wearing a Mask: It is a crime to possess a firearm in a public place or on any public street while masked so as to hide the identity of the person carrying the firearm. (Penal Code 12040).
yelohamr
Regular Member
imported post
Gundude wrote:
Gundude wrote:
I forgot about that. Well, just stand with your back to the camera. See if Sunnydale can identify your a$$.:lol:
suntzu
Regular Member
imported post
it sounds like the "officers" there in Kommiefornia are just itching to be sued.
it sounds like the "officers" there in Kommiefornia are just itching to be sued.
suntzu
Regular Member
imported post
Rusty wrote:
grammar as well as spelling...the educational system has definitely failed the Sunnyvale pd...
Rusty wrote:
grammar as well as spelling...the educational system has definitely failed the Sunnyvale pd...
Gundude
Regular Member
imported post
yelohamr wrote:
yelohamr wrote:
Or turn around, drop your pants and give them a moon shot. Then they can identify you a$$ :what:
suntzu
Regular Member
imported post
yelohamr wrote:
how about take pictures of them taking pictures? :idea:
Document the harassment and put it on youtube....
It sounds like the cops of Sunnyvale have a major case of LDS...
yelohamr wrote:
how about take pictures of them taking pictures? :idea:
Document the harassment and put it on youtube....
It sounds like the cops of Sunnyvale have a major case of LDS...
Streetbikerr6
Regular Member
imported post
Gundude wrote:
But you forgot..
12040. (a) A person commits criminal possession of a firearm when
he or she carries a firearm in a public place or on any public street
while masked so as to hide his or her identity.
(b) Criminal possession of a firearm is punishable by imprisonment
in the state prison or by imprisonment in a county jail not to
exceed one year.
(c) Subdivision (a) shall not apply to the following:
(1) A peace officer who is in the performance of his or her
duties.
(2) Full-time paid peace officers of other states and the federal
government who are carrying out official duties while in this state.
(3) Any person summoned by any of the officers enumerated in
paragraph (1) or (2) to assist in making arrests or preserving the
peace while he or she is actually engaged in assisting that officer.
(4) The possession of an unloaded firearm or a firearm loaded with
blank ammunition by an authorized participant in, or while
rehearsing for, a motion picture, television, video production,
entertainment event, entertainment activity, or lawfully organized
and conducted activity when the participant lawfully uses the firearm
as part of that production, event, or activity.
booyah :celebrate
Gundude wrote:
But you forgot..
12040. (a) A person commits criminal possession of a firearm when
he or she carries a firearm in a public place or on any public street
while masked so as to hide his or her identity.
(b) Criminal possession of a firearm is punishable by imprisonment
in the state prison or by imprisonment in a county jail not to
exceed one year.
(c) Subdivision (a) shall not apply to the following:
(1) A peace officer who is in the performance of his or her
duties.
(2) Full-time paid peace officers of other states and the federal
government who are carrying out official duties while in this state.
(3) Any person summoned by any of the officers enumerated in
paragraph (1) or (2) to assist in making arrests or preserving the
peace while he or she is actually engaged in assisting that officer.
(4) The possession of an unloaded firearm or a firearm loaded with
blank ammunition by an authorized participant in, or while
rehearsing for, a motion picture, television, video production,
entertainment event, entertainment activity, or lawfully organized
and conducted activity when the participant lawfully uses the firearm
as part of that production, event, or activity.
booyah :celebrate
coolusername2007
Regular Member
imported post
chewy352 wrote:
chewy352 wrote:
Because they are anti-gun, anti-2A, and do not support and defend the Constitution as their oathrequires of them. But they are in favor of police weaponry on the grounds of being able "to go home to their families everynight." But that doesn't apply to you. Its called hypocrisy and tyranny and our founding fathers warned us of them.
Streetbikerr6
Regular Member
imported post
coolusername2007 wrote:
coolusername2007 wrote:
Yes exactly. If they were in fact anything close to Pro-2a, we would all have CCW's and this forum would likely not exist.
suntzu
Regular Member
imported post
coolusername2007 wrote:
coolusername2007 wrote:
And that is why civil rights complaints should be made to the FBI every time a rights violation occurs. Enough complaints will get the Bureau to investigating the department.
demnogis
Regular Member
imported post
If even part of what is being commented on here is true in the PRAR'd documents, I think I know now why the notorious and incorrect Sacramento Memo is rife with fear of litigation. Is it quite possible that these LEAs know their bad policies could let them proverbally shoot themselves in the foot?
What is it called again when a LEA knowingly writes and implements bad policies that violate our rights without due process?
suntzu wrote:
If even part of what is being commented on here is true in the PRAR'd documents, I think I know now why the notorious and incorrect Sacramento Memo is rife with fear of litigation. Is it quite possible that these LEAs know their bad policies could let them proverbally shoot themselves in the foot?
What is it called again when a LEA knowingly writes and implements bad policies that violate our rights without due process?
suntzu wrote:
Streetbikerr6
Regular Member
imported post
demnogis wrote:
Yes.Anyone calling us terrible people to threaten to sue if our rights are knowingly violatedis asfoolish as telling a rapist victim she is terrible for getting a restraining order on her rapist.
A violation is a violation. Just because one wears a badge does not mean they should not fear repercussions if they abuse their powers. If we could send a LEO to jail for violating our rights instead of using litigation, I am sure we would take that route instead of a lawsuit. Though it doesn't quite work that way does it.
The onlytwo reasons a cop has to keep themselves in line with their duty is either respect for their job or fear for losing it.Any cop thatundermines our group as nothing but peoplelooking for litigationafter breaking our civil rights they know not to break obviously does not esteem the meaning of wearing a badge. To uphold the law.
The law is on our side. Whatever view a LEO may or may not haveabout a citizensGod given right to protect his and his familys life is insignificant. If they want that much power they should move to a police state such as North Korea.
demnogis wrote:
Yes.Anyone calling us terrible people to threaten to sue if our rights are knowingly violatedis asfoolish as telling a rapist victim she is terrible for getting a restraining order on her rapist.
A violation is a violation. Just because one wears a badge does not mean they should not fear repercussions if they abuse their powers. If we could send a LEO to jail for violating our rights instead of using litigation, I am sure we would take that route instead of a lawsuit. Though it doesn't quite work that way does it.
The onlytwo reasons a cop has to keep themselves in line with their duty is either respect for their job or fear for losing it.Any cop thatundermines our group as nothing but peoplelooking for litigationafter breaking our civil rights they know not to break obviously does not esteem the meaning of wearing a badge. To uphold the law.
The law is on our side. Whatever view a LEO may or may not haveabout a citizensGod given right to protect his and his familys life is insignificant. If they want that much power they should move to a police state such as North Korea.
N6ATF
Banned
imported post
Streetbikerr6 wrote:
Streetbikerr6 wrote:
Why move to that third-world country when the food is so much better here and they are immune from prosecution?
yelohamr
Regular Member
imported post
Has anyone thought of uploading videosof 4A violationsto Fox News Channel? After enough instances of national exposure of CALEOs trampling the rights of citizens, maybe they'll get a clue that we aren't going away.
Has anyone thought of uploading videosof 4A violationsto Fox News Channel? After enough instances of national exposure of CALEOs trampling the rights of citizens, maybe they'll get a clue that we aren't going away.
N6ATF
Banned
imported post
yelohamr wrote:
yelohamr wrote:
Do they have a system for uploading, or is it just a matter of emailing links to them?
PavePusher
Regular Member
imported post
chewy352 wrote:
chewy352 wrote:
See? O.C. is making you a better, kinder, softer person! Who needs counciling?:lol:
yelohamr
Regular Member
imported post
N6ATF wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/ureport/index.html
N6ATF wrote:
Looks like filling in the blanks and describing what you are uploading.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/ureport/index.html