simmonsjoe
Regular Member
imported post
TFred wrote:
TFred wrote:
Half of me agrees, the other half thinks the 'good and sufficient reason' is unacceptably vague and subjective. The Good and Sufficient reason is only as sufficient as a judge wants it to be that day. This new idea, though inappropriate, is uniform. Laws should always be uniform.jmelvin wrote:I tend to agree, this isn't really better. I attend a large church, at any given time on a Sunday, there are several "meetings" going on throughout the campus, and multiple people speak at various times during the services. It would be nearly impossible to define one person to "ask".I think I'd rather deal with the "good and sufficient reason" than worry about showing that I have permission from some church leader. Ohio makes this same requirement, but their requirement is for concealed carry only.
If a church has decided they don't want gun carriers in the congregation let them put up a sign, otherwise remove the restriction in whole. This proposed change is NOT an improvement in my opinion.
TFred