barf
Regular Member
imported post
There is much discussion lately about open carry in an open carry friendly state such as Louisiana. Some advocate armed marches in heavily populated areas to let the "sheeple" know that it is legal to open carry, while some maintain just to open carry as you go about your business as usual in your local community. (some advocate both depending on which way the wind is blowing)
What would an armed march in a heavily populated area accomplish where open carry is already legal? Should we care about any negative impact an armed march may have on open carry or on gun owners in general?
Would open carrying as you go about your business in your local community, possibly spreading the good word about open carry and handing out literature, be a better option?
note: the open carry friendly state designation is from the opencarry.org map and based on fact, not preconcieved notions of a police conspiracy in the state of Louisiana.
There is much discussion lately about open carry in an open carry friendly state such as Louisiana. Some advocate armed marches in heavily populated areas to let the "sheeple" know that it is legal to open carry, while some maintain just to open carry as you go about your business as usual in your local community. (some advocate both depending on which way the wind is blowing)
What would an armed march in a heavily populated area accomplish where open carry is already legal? Should we care about any negative impact an armed march may have on open carry or on gun owners in general?
Would open carrying as you go about your business in your local community, possibly spreading the good word about open carry and handing out literature, be a better option?
note: the open carry friendly state designation is from the opencarry.org map and based on fact, not preconcieved notions of a police conspiracy in the state of Louisiana.