Trigger Dr
Regular Member
imported post
Edited to delete a thread that has been hijacked into personal attacks.
Edited to delete a thread that has been hijacked into personal attacks.
Prove it.Isn't it funny how most (if not all) gun grabbers are blatant thieves or at least extremely corrupt?
What! were you offended by that comment? If so, why?Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:Prove it.Isn't it funny how most (if not all) gun grabbers are blatant thieves or at least extremely corrupt?
erps wrote:What! were you offended by that comment? If so, why?Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:Prove it.Isn't it funny how most (if not all) gun grabbers are blatant thieves or at least extremely corrupt?
erps wrote:What! were you offended by that comment? If so, why?Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:Prove it.Isn't it funny how most (if not all) gun grabbers are blatant thieves or at least extremely corrupt?
sudden valley gunner wrote:erps wrote:What! were you offended by that comment? If so, why?Washintonian_For_Liberty wrote:Prove it.Isn't it funny how most (if not all) gun grabbers are blatant thieves or at least extremely corrupt?
Replace the word gun grabber with another descriptor, like a person's race, sex or religious views and hear how it sounds. What if the statement had been "isn't it funny how most Lummi's are blatant thieves or at the least extremely corrupt".
That's your perception. FBI crime stats are on the internet. Show me the crime stat broken down by political position on gun policies. Heck, there are all sorts of goofy stats on the internet. Do a google search for something like "thieves are for gun control" and the only close hit you get is that funny youtube video.I don't agree with the statement as made but do agree that it seems that ones who are corrupt and thieves also tend to be for anti-gun policies.
Wow, quoting a bunch of criminals like the FBI... can't trust an unconstitutional bureau like the FBI, BATFE, DEA or any other criminal organization designed to protect the criminal politicians. There is nothing they can say or do that will change what they are... blatant criminals and thieves.That's your perception. FBI crime stats are on the internet. Show me the crime stat broken down by political position on gun policies. Heck, there are all sorts of goofy stats on the internet. Do a google search for something like "thieves are for gun control" and the only close hit you get is that funny youtube video.I don't agree with the statement as made but do agree that it seems that ones who are corrupt and thieves also tend to be for anti-gun policies.
Okay, so according to you anti-gunners are thieves and government law enforcement officials are criminals. How about Asians. What are they all like?erps wrote:Wow, quoting a bunch of criminals like the FBI... can't trust an unconstitutional bureau like the FBI, BATFE, DEA or any other criminal organization designed to protect the criminal politicians. There is nothing they can say or do that will change what they are... blatant criminals and thieves.That's your perception. FBI crime stats are on the internet. Show me the crime stat broken down by political position on gun policies. Heck, there are all sorts of goofy stats on the internet. Do a google search for something like "thieves are for gun control" and the only close hit you get is that funny youtube video.I don't agree with the statement as made but do agree that it seems that ones who are corrupt and thieves also tend to be for anti-gun policies.
Proof.... taxes are supposed to be voluntary... try and stop paying... then... when they try and take the taxes from you... try and resist.... they will come to your house with guns... and if you resist with guns to protect yourself... they will kill you. They are thieves. All the organizations above are tax enforcement organizations.... with guns.... and the taxes are not legal because if you tax one person to GIVE the money to another, that creates involuntary servitude which is a direct violation of the US Constitution and a violation of human (inalienable) rights.
It has to do with generalizations and the people who make them.Our society has become more sensitive to racialprejudice. Ithelpsillustrate other types of prejudice. Oh, by the way, I don't know Washington from Adam and did not know he had an Asian wife. I'd prefer you not tell me what I know and don't know and I wasn't missing the point. That's your perception again.Wow!! This has nothing to do with race!!!
I don't need FBI statistics and you are trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill.
And are not talking about the general population here. How in the hell do you eqaute that to ethnic background?
When I say seems like look at the politicians like the one this thread has been started about corruption abounds.
And another thing stop trying to make it personal knowing I have some native background and Washington has an asian wife! Especially when you are totally missing the point of what I said and trying to force it down a different tangent.
Your perception again SVG. I have no idea if one party is more corrupt than the other party. What I am comfortable saying is that the people in either party percieve the other party as being more corrupt. Because they believe that, they remember the information that confirms their theory and don't remember contrary information, thus reinforcing their perception.Just like there "seems" to be more corruption in that party also. (I am no fan of Republicans either).