AmosMoses
Regular Member
imported post
I was reading something on "rescue knives/switchblades", and it seemed to me that there was a legal premise that the federal government couldn't restrict the carrying of these knives, so the fed switchblade act was cooked up in regards to something they could in fact control, that being interstate commerce of the knives.
Now, that was what I gathered, and I think I am correct. Not correct as in that the point is right, but that I am pretty sure that I am correct that the writer's interpretation was in fact this. And, as I read some of the language of the law (as posted), this language seemed to follow inasmuch as the fed regulation seemed to stem from a commerce aspect.
Notwithstanding, this seems extremeley contrary to my observations in life. The "assault weapons" ban is a prime example of the feds restricting The People contrary to the foregoing idea, but of course, maybe that law also read in relation to commerce, banning interstate commerce in them, or something. But, consider the LEOSA....that also seems like an overriding of state law by the feds (albeit in my mind in the right direction), because I can't see any commerce angle on that.
I'm just curious about this....
I was reading something on "rescue knives/switchblades", and it seemed to me that there was a legal premise that the federal government couldn't restrict the carrying of these knives, so the fed switchblade act was cooked up in regards to something they could in fact control, that being interstate commerce of the knives.
Now, that was what I gathered, and I think I am correct. Not correct as in that the point is right, but that I am pretty sure that I am correct that the writer's interpretation was in fact this. And, as I read some of the language of the law (as posted), this language seemed to follow inasmuch as the fed regulation seemed to stem from a commerce aspect.
Notwithstanding, this seems extremeley contrary to my observations in life. The "assault weapons" ban is a prime example of the feds restricting The People contrary to the foregoing idea, but of course, maybe that law also read in relation to commerce, banning interstate commerce in them, or something. But, consider the LEOSA....that also seems like an overriding of state law by the feds (albeit in my mind in the right direction), because I can't see any commerce angle on that.
I'm just curious about this....