• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Pheasant Lane Mall, (Restricted) from all weapons and Firearms even with NH License to carry

We-the-People

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,221
Location
White City, Oregon, USA
imported post

A private business can limit your right to free speech on their property as no such right exists except to protect us from government. Just as this board can kick off anyone they wish, a private property owner can do the same.

They can prohibit you from entering without agreeing to a search but they can not just arbitrarilly decide to search your stuff. Well they can but settled civil cases show that if it wasn't a condition of entry, it's gonna cost them.

They can prohibit you from entering or remaining while carrying a firearm. This should not be for any business open to the general public (retail stores, malls, big box stores, etc.) but is the way it is.....for now.

The example I chose, of a prohibition based on race is most definitely a Constitutionally protected right which can not be dismissed by a business owner. Race, color, gender, ethnic background, age, and a couple of others have been ruled to be "protected classes" against which a business owner can not discriminate.

We are headed to the day that private property which is open to the general public will not be able to discriminate against firearms carriers. Some may think that is against the Constitution but it is not and here is why. If the property owner doesn't want to have gun carriers on his property he merely needs to not allow the public on his property.

There are a lot more intrusive rules and regulations which business owners must deal with in order to "stay legal" when opening their doors to the general public. Ever heard of the ADA? It costs private business billions of dollars since its signature into law. The EPA, OSHA, Bureau's of Labor, and a myriad of other acronym toting government money wasters have seen to it that they all have a little say in removing a little piece of freedom here and a little piece there. Generally with a nice price tag attached.
 
Top