imported post
mikestilly wrote:
The difference is pot is not legal.
I am talking about a legal gun owner being granted permission by the owner/agent. Key word permission. If you a concealed carring without permission the yes I see that point but as far seeing one of my friends in my house/property semi concealed still doesn't warrant probable cause to enter but pot or smell is because it is illegal.
mikestilly wrote:
UCWT wrote:
TheSzerdi wrote:
To those who believe you can be granted permission to OC in a bar, but not CC on private property:
It is ILLEGAL to OC in an establishment licensed by the Michigan Liquor Control Commission unless you have a CPL.
It is ILLEGAL to CC off of your property without a CPL.
It is LEGAL to OC in an establishment licensed by the Michigan Liquor Control Commission with owner's permission without a CPL.
It is ILLEGAL to CC at a friend's house with permission without a CPL.
That is your argument. See any flaws?
Either the owner cannot grant permission to either or the owner can grant permission to both. Which is it?
Exactly!!
Edited for +1
Edited to add:
The law provides specific exception for specific regulation of private property in the case of OC in a bar. This goes back to my point earlier that unless specifically regulated private property rights trump all.
We seem to be going in circles here. So are you trying to tell me that 750.227 doesnt specifically regulate what you can do just because you're on a private property? That doesnt make sense. Then with that line of logic doing a long list of illegal things could be trumped by private property rights and doing illegal acts on your property would be not put anyone in violation.. The logic to me doesnt add up. They may need a search warrant to search the house itself but if police were to enter a home an somehow saw a non-homeowner concealing they would be in violation just like any other MCL statute on the books. Same thing as if the cops were at the door of a home and the person opened with a 10 lbs of pot behind them. By plain view they are in violation regardless of their private property rights. The logic of private property rights trump breaking laws on the books to me doesnt make any sense and I can't see how it could be true.
The difference is pot is not legal.
I am talking about a legal gun owner being granted permission by the owner/agent. Key word permission. If you a concealed carring without permission the yes I see that point but as far seeing one of my friends in my house/property semi concealed still doesn't warrant probable cause to enter but pot or smell is because it is illegal.