sudden valley gunner
Regular Member
imported post
BigDave wrote:
kito109654 wrote:
There is your context for why I said that statement. How do you stretch a law? It is either legal or it isn't?
BigDave wrote:
sudden valley gunner wrote:
I was referring to your statement made at Posted: Tue Jan 19th, 2010 10:03 pm "If it's legal it's not stretching it." Still a stupid statement relating to the story. :dude:Dave I wish you could debate without having to resort to personal attacks. Again tell me what is "stupid", about the statement? Oh yea everyone who never took a self defense class is stupid to you sorry forgot.
kito109654 wrote:
NavyLT wrote:Bobarino wrote:You are absolutely correct, Bobarino. So long as you don't lie on the 4473 it is perfectly legal. So, Crypto gives you the money for the gun, making him the actual source of the payment for the gun, thereby making him the actual purchaser of the gun because you are going to hand the gun over to him after you get it with his money. You go into the gun store and answer the 4473 completely honestly and the first question you answer, "Are you the actual purchaser of the firearm", you write No on the form.there's a spot on the 4473 that asks if this gun is for you or someone else. fill it out honestly and you're still legal.
You have done nothing illegal. Now, granted, the FFL CANNOT sell you the gun, without losing their license and going to Federal prison, but YOU have done nothing illegal and are in the clear.
Again, playing devil's advocate here...
There's a fine line to be drawn. Technically it would still be fine to be the purchaser and then sell the firearm, or even plan to sell the firearm. The only difference is when the money trades hands. It's not illegal as long as they are not prohibited from owning a pistol.
With this attitude of fine lines or blending, bending rules to suit your needs will have law abiding citizens wondering about people as yourself and your intentions.
This can give the armed community a bad name and second guessed everything we turn around.
So Playing Devil's Advocate, Play with in the laws with out stretching them.
There is your context for why I said that statement. How do you stretch a law? It is either legal or it isn't?