stainless1911
Banned
imported post
I was convicted of violating my CPL today, and while in court, I uncovered a serious problem.
The problem is that the judge in the case did not recognise the opinions of the attorney general, and the state police liason, regarding OC with a CPL in PFZs. I mensioned this to the judge, obviously, but since there is no case law, and no state law, but only an opinion, he referred to 28.4250 and considered the school/church zones to be pistol free zones wether open or concealed. Several Oakland County officers were in attendance (to their credit), so they could learn the laws in this issue, and this is of course what they will be acting upon. We will no longer be able to carry openly in PFZs with a CPL.
Although this was not the basis for the conviction, I had to post this, as so many of us rely on these AG opinions, and I dont want to see anyone get into trouble.
If someone could find and post the AG opinion and the state police liason statement, I would appreciate it, I couldnt find it.
I was convicted of violating my CPL today, and while in court, I uncovered a serious problem.
The problem is that the judge in the case did not recognise the opinions of the attorney general, and the state police liason, regarding OC with a CPL in PFZs. I mensioned this to the judge, obviously, but since there is no case law, and no state law, but only an opinion, he referred to 28.4250 and considered the school/church zones to be pistol free zones wether open or concealed. Several Oakland County officers were in attendance (to their credit), so they could learn the laws in this issue, and this is of course what they will be acting upon. We will no longer be able to carry openly in PFZs with a CPL.
Although this was not the basis for the conviction, I had to post this, as so many of us rely on these AG opinions, and I dont want to see anyone get into trouble.
If someone could find and post the AG opinion and the state police liason statement, I would appreciate it, I couldnt find it.